Literature DB >> 30785826

West German Study PlanB Trial: Adjuvant Four Cycles of Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide Plus Docetaxel Versus Six Cycles of Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide in HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancer.

Ulrike Nitz1,2, Oleg Gluz1,2,3, Michael Clemens4, Wolfram Malter3, Toralf Reimer5, Benno Nuding6, Bahriye Aktas7,8, Andrea Stefek9, Anke Pollmanns10, Fatemeh Lorenz-Salehi11, Christoph Uleer12, Petra Krabisch13, Sherko Kuemmel14, Cornelia Liedtke1,15, Steven Shak16, Rachel Wuerstlein1,17, Matthias Christgen18, Ronald E Kates1, Hans H Kreipe18, Nadia Harbeck1,17.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The West German Study Group PlanB trial evaluated an anthracycline-free chemotherapy standard (six cycles of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide [TC]) in the routine treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer (EBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with pT1 to pT4c, all pN+, and pN0/high-risk EBC were eligible. High-risk pN0 was defined by one or more of the following: pT greater than 2, grade 2 to 3, high urokinase-type plasminogen activator/plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, hormone receptor (HR) negativity, and less than 35 years of age. After an early amendment, all HR-positive tumors underwent recurrence score (RS) testing, with chemotherapy omission recommended in RS less than or equal to 11 pN0 to pN1 disease. Patients were randomly assigned to four cycles of epirubicin (E)90/cyclophoshamide (C)600 followed by four cycles of docetaxel (T)100 or six cycles of T75C600 (administered once every 3 weeks). The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS); secondary end points were overall survival (OS) and safety. The protocol specified P = .05 for a noninferiority margin of 4.4% for all patients combined.
RESULTS: Of the 3,198 registered patients, 348 (RS ≤ 11) omitted chemotherapy, and 401 were not randomly assigned. The intention-to-treat population included 2,449 patients (1,227 EC-T v 1,222 TC: postmenopausal, 62.2% v 60.8%; pN0, 58.2% v 59.5%; pT1, 57.6% v 52.3%; HR positive, 81.4% v 82.2%; RS greater than 25 [in HR-positive patients], 26.2% v 27.5%). Within the safety population (1,167 v 1,178 patients), 87.5% v 93.0% completed therapy. After a 60-month median follow-up, 5-year outcomes were similar in the EC-T and TC arms (DFS, 89.6% [95% CI, 87.9% to 91.5%] v 89.9% [95% CI, 88.1% to 91.8%]; OS, 94.5% [95% CI, 93.1% to 95.9%] v 94.7% [95% CI, 93.3% to 96.1%]). The DFS difference was within the noninferiority margin of the original trial design. Five treatment-related deaths were reported for TC (one for EC-T), despite a trend toward more-severe adverse events in the latter. Interaction analysis revealed no predictive trends with respect to key factors, including triple-negative, luminal A/B-like, pN, age, and RS status.
CONCLUSION: In the West German Study Group PlanB trial, 5-year outcomes for TC and EC-T were equally excellent. Six cycles of TC is an effective/safe option in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative EBC with pN0 high genomic risk or pN1 EBC with genomically intermediate- to high-risk disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30785826     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.18.00028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  25 in total

1.  The Comparative Safety of Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide versus Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide in Lymph Node-Negative, HR-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer (ELEGANT): A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Deyue Liu; Jiayi Wu; Caijin Lin; Shuning Ding; Shuangshuang Lu; Yan Fang; Jiahui Huang; Jin Hong; Weiqi Gao; Siji Zhu; Xiaosong Chen; Ou Huang; Jianrong He; Weiguo Chen; Yafen Li; Kunwei Shen; Li Zhu
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 2.  Treatment of Early Breast Cancer Patients: Evidence, Controversies, Consensus: Focusing on Systemic Therapy - German Experts' Opinions for the 16th International St. Gallen Consensus Conference (Vienna 2019).

Authors:  Diana Lüftner; Ingo Bauerfeind; Michael Braun; Sara Y Brucker; Peter A Fasching; Ricardo Felberbaum; Friederike Hagemann; Renate Haidinger; Nadia Harbeck; Arnd Hönig; Jens Huober; Christian Jackisch; Hans-Christian Kolberg; Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke; Thorsten Kühn; Nicolai Maass; Toralf Reimer; Andreas Schneeweiss; Eva Schumacher-Wulf; Florian Schütz; Christoph Thomssen; Michael Untch; Rachel Wuerstlein; Marc Thill
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 3.  St. Gallen/Vienna 2019: A Brief Summary of the Consensus Discussion on the Optimal Primary Breast Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Marija Balic; Christoph Thomssen; Rachel Würstlein; Michael Gnant; Nadia Harbeck
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Standard Anthracycline Based Versus Docetaxel-Capecitabine in Early High Clinical and/or Genomic Risk Breast Cancer in the EORTC 10041/BIG 3-04 MINDACT Phase III Trial.

Authors:  Suzette Delaloge; Martine Piccart; Emiel Rutgers; Saskia Litière; Laura J van 't Veer; Franchette van den Berkmortel; Etienne Brain; Aleksandra Dudek-Peric; Miguel Gil-Gil; Patricia Gomez; Florentine S Hilbers; Zaman Khalil; Susan Knox; Sherko Kuemmel; Georg Kunz; Anne Lesur; Jean-Yves Pierga; Peter Ravdin; Isabel T Rubio; Mahasti Saghatchian; Tineke J Smilde; Alastair M Thompson; Giuseppe Viale; Gabriele Zoppoli; Peter Vuylsteke; Konstantinos Tryfonidis; Coralie Poncet; Jan Bogaerts; Fatima Cardoso
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Management of hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer.

Authors:  Elaine M Walsh; Karen L Smith; Vered Stearns
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 4.929

6.  Prognostic Impact of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay Among Young Women With Node-Negative and Node-Positive ER-Positive/HER2-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Philip D Poorvu; Shari I Gelber; Shoshana M Rosenberg; Kathryn J Ruddy; Rulla M Tamimi; Laura C Collins; Jeffrey Peppercorn; Lidia Schapira; Virginia F Borges; Steven E Come; Ellen Warner; Debbie M Jakubowski; Christy Russell; Eric P Winer; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Genomic Signatures in Luminal Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Julian Puppe; Tabea Seifert; Christian Eichler; Henryk Pilch; Peter Mallmann; Wolfram Malter
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Four cycles of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide as adjuvant chemotherapy in node negative breast cancer: A real-world study.

Authors:  Atul Batra; Malek B Hannouf; Noura Alsafar; Sasha Lupichuk
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 9.  Early Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Conventional Treatment and Emerging Therapeutic Landscapes.

Authors:  Anna Diana; Francesca Carlino; Elisena Franzese; Olga Oikonomidou; Carmen Criscitiello; Ferdinando De Vita; Fortunato Ciardiello; Michele Orditura
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-29       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  A randomized study comparing docetaxel/cyclophosphamide (TC), 5-fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (FEC) followed by TC, and TC followed by FEC for patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Hiroshi Ishiguro; Norikazu Masuda; Nobuaki Sato; Kenji Higaki; Takashi Morimoto; Yasuhiro Yanagita; Makiko Mizutani; Shoichiro Ohtani; Koji Kaneko; Tomomi Fujisawa; Masato Takahashi; Takayuki Kadoya; Nobuki Matsunami; Yutaka Yamamoto; Shinji Ohno; Toshimi Takano; Satoshi Morita; Sachiko Tanaka-Mizuno; Masakazu Toi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.