Literature DB >> 30784661

Uncovering genetic mechanisms of kidney aging through transcriptomics, genomics, and epigenomics.

Joshua Rowland1, Artur Akbarov1, James Eales1, Xiaoguang Xu1, John P Dormer2, Hui Guo3, Matthew Denniff4, Xiao Jiang1, Parisa Ranjzad5, Alicja Nazgiewicz1, Priscilla Ribeiro Prestes6, Andrzej Antczak7, Monika Szulinska8, Ingrid A Wise6, Ewa Zukowska-Szczechowska9, Pawel Bogdanski8, Adrian S Woolf10, Nilesh J Samani11, Fadi J Charchar12, Maciej Tomaszewski13.   

Abstract

Nephrons scar and involute during aging, increasing the risk of chronic kidney disease. Little is known, however, about genetic mechanisms of kidney aging. We sought to define the signatures of age on the renal transcriptome using 563 human kidneys. The initial discovery analysis of 260 kidney transcriptomes from the TRANScriptome of renaL humAn TissuE Study (TRANSLATE) and the Cancer Genome Atlas identified 37 age-associated genes. For 19 of those genes, the association with age was replicated in 303 kidney transcriptomes from the Nephroseq resource. Surveying 42 nonrenal tissues from the Genotype-Tissue Expression project revealed that, for approximately a fifth of the replicated genes, the association with age was kidney-specific. Seventy-three percent of the replicated genes were associated with functional or histological parameters of age-related decline in kidney health, including glomerular filtration rate, glomerulosclerosis, interstitial fibrosis, tubular atrophy, and arterial narrowing. Common genetic variants in four of the age-related genes, namely LYG1, PPP1R3C, LTF and TSPYL5, correlated with the trajectory of age-related changes in their renal expression. Integrative analysis of genomic, epigenomic, and transcriptomic information revealed that the observed age-related decline in renal TSPYL5 expression was determined both genetically and epigenetically. Thus, this study revealed robust molecular signatures of the aging kidney and new regulatory mechanisms of age-related change in the kidney transcriptome.
Copyright © 2019 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aging; epigenome; genetics; kidney; transcriptome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30784661      PMCID: PMC6390171          DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.10.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int        ISSN: 0085-2538            Impact factor:   10.612


see commentary on page 492 Aging is associated with a decline in health and integrity of the human kidney. Indeed, from the fourth decade of life, the glomerular filtration rate falls by 8 ml/min per 1.73 m2 every 10 years. Moreover, the kidney undergoes structural remodeling with age.3, 4 Macroscopically, kidney mass and blood flow decline with age.3, 5, 6 These changes are likely to contribute to the known increase in risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) with age. Genetic mechanisms may impact renal aging, and previous gene expression profiling experiments highlighted molecules associated with the development of age-related changes in the kidney.8, 9 These studies had several caveats: they used small numbers of samples, typically fewer than 100; lacked robust replication in independent cohorts; and used microarrays to quantify the expression of genes in the kidney. In contrast to microarrays, next-generation RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) allows for an unbiased hypothesis-free approach to transcriptome profiling and increased sensitivity to detect changes in genes with low levels of expression such as long noncoding RNAs.10, 11 Thus, previous studies may not have defined certain genes relevant to kidney aging because of limitations in technology or sample size, whereas the genes that were identified were not replicated in other populations. It also is unclear whether the expression of age-associated kidney genes is controlled, at least in part, by genetically and/or epigenetically inherited variations in DNA. Single differences in DNA sequences determine phenotypic variation in health and disease, for example, through differential effects on gene expression.12, 13 Several recent studies have reported associations between common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and human aging, as well as renal gene expression. Epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methylation, also can modify gene expression. Indeed, aging is accompanied by genome-wide hypomethylation and site-specific hypermethylation, at least in nonrenal tissues. The age-related changes in regional 5′—C—phosphate—G—3′ site (CpG) methylation across tissues have been used to derive a global epigenetic signature as a measure of biological age.18, 19 Nevertheless, patterns of DNA methylation are highly variable across different tissues and a majority of methylation studies have been conducted on tissues other than the kidney. In this study, we identified robust signatures of age on the renal transcriptome by studying a large assembly of human kidneys characterized by RNA-seq. We identified several genes that showed similar age-related changes across different human tissues, while others represented kidney-specific aging signatures. We also found associations between these signatures and certain functional and structural measures of kidney health. Finally, by integrating genomic, epigenomic, and transcriptomic information, we uncovered new regulatory mechanisms underlying the expression of age-related signatures in the human kidney.

Results

Signatures of age on kidney transcriptome: discovery analysis

The design and delivery of the project is shown in the flow chart in Figure 1. In total, 160 patients from the TRANScriptome of renaL humAn TissuE (TRANSLATE) Study and 100 individuals from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were included in the discovery analysis. The clinical characteristics of both studies are shown in Table 1. A total of 15,791 kidney genes common to both data sets were included in the analysis. After correction for multiple testing, 37 genes were associated with age (Figure 2, Supplementary Figure S1, and Supplementary Table S1). Of these, 33 were protein-coding and 4 were long noncoding RNAs. Biological characteristics of these genes are shown in Supplementary Table S2. Only 1 gene, EGF, overlapped with 307 genes implicated in aging from the GenAge database. Taking advantage of clinical information available in the TRANSLATE Study, we further examined the potential effects of common cofounders or comorbidities on the association between age and renal gene expression. The sensitivity analysis showed that after adjusting for body mass index, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus, 30 of the 37 genes (81%) retained associations with age in the TRANSLATE Study at the nominal level of statistical significance of 5% (Supplementary Table S3).
Figure 1

Illustration of key stages of the project together with the main outcomes. TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; TRANSLATE Study, TRANScriptome of renaL humAn TissuE Study; Nephroseq renal cortex, a combination of 3 separate studies of renal cortex/glomerulus from Nephroseq resource; Nephroseq renal medulla, a combination of 3 separate studies of renal medulla/tubulointerstitium from Nephroseq resource; GTEx, Genotype–Tissue Expression project; cis-eQTL, cis-expression quantitative trait locus; cis-mQTL, cis-methylation quantitative trait locus; eGene, gene whose renal expression is associated with at least 1 single-nucleotide polymorphism in-cis after correction for multiple testing; mSNP, gene whose renal DNA methylation is associated with at least 1 single-nucleotide polymorphism in-cis after correction for multiple testing; CPG, 5’—C—phosphate—G—3’ site; eSNP, transcriptionally active single-nucleotide polymorphism.

Table 1

Demographic and selected clinical characteristics of the TRANSLATE Study and TCGA

CharacteristicsTRANSLATE StudyTCGA
N160100
Age, yr63.2 ± 10.461.4 ± 13.3
Age range, yr30–8728–86
Male sex99 (62%)69 (69%)
White–European ethnicity160 (100%)100 (100%)
Body mass index, kg/m228.2 ± 5.2
Hypertension116 (73%)
Diabetes29 (18%)
eGFR, ml/min per 1.73 m275.3 ± 19.1
Glomerular sclerosis59/82/13/0
Interstitial fibrosis70/70/14/0
Tubular atrophy67/69/17/1
Arterial/arteriolar narrowing15/94/39/6

eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; TRANSLATE, TRANScriptome of renaL humAn TissuE Study.

Data are counts (and percentages where appropriate), means and SDs or ranges. For histologic phenotypes (n = 154), data are numbers with Remuzzi’s scale from 0 to 3 (0/1/2/3), where 0 indicates none to minimal damage and 3 indicates maximal damage.

Figure 2

Overview of kidney genes associated with age. Chromosome numbers appear at the top of the circle and proceed clockwise. Track 1: The level of statistical significance (-log10P values) from meta-analysis of association between renal gene expression and age in the TRANScriptome of renaL humAn TissuE (TRANSLATE) Study and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Track 2: Symbols of 37 kidney genes associated with age in the meta-analysis of the TRANSLATE Study and TCGA after the correction for multiple testing. Track 3: Direction of association between expression of a gene and age (based on β-coefficients from the meta-analysis of the TRANSLATE Study and TCGA). Yellow, positive: gene is upregulated with increasing age; pink, negative: gene is downregulated with increasing age. Track 4: Prior evidence for association with aging determined via search of PubMed, GenAge, and AgeMap databases. Blue, genes previously associated with age; orange, no previous association with age. Track 5: Kidney genes associated with age in Nephroseq resource (red). Track 6: Kidney-specific (in purple) and ubiquitous (in green) signatures of age (based on the analysis of nonrenal tissues). Tracks 7 to 11: Associations between replicated age-related kidney genes and estimated glomerular filtration rate (track 7), glomerulosclerosis (track 8), interstitial fibrosis (track 9), tubular atrophy (track 10), and arterial/arteriolar narrowing (track 11). At least nominally significant associations are shown in blue.

Illustration of key stages of the project together with the main outcomes. TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; TRANSLATE Study, TRANScriptome of renaL humAn TissuE Study; Nephroseq renal cortex, a combination of 3 separate studies of renal cortex/glomerulus from Nephroseq resource; Nephroseq renal medulla, a combination of 3 separate studies of renal medulla/tubulointerstitium from Nephroseq resource; GTEx, Genotype–Tissue Expression project; cis-eQTL, cis-expression quantitative trait locus; cis-mQTL, cis-methylation quantitative trait locus; eGene, gene whose renal expression is associated with at least 1 single-nucleotide polymorphism in-cis after correction for multiple testing; mSNP, gene whose renal DNA methylation is associated with at least 1 single-nucleotide polymorphism in-cis after correction for multiple testing; CPG, 5’—C—phosphate—G—3’ site; eSNP, transcriptionally active single-nucleotide polymorphism. Demographic and selected clinical characteristics of the TRANSLATE Study and TCGA eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; TRANSLATE, TRANScriptome of renaL humAn TissuE Study. Data are counts (and percentages where appropriate), means and SDs or ranges. For histologic phenotypes (n = 154), data are numbers with Remuzzi’s scale from 0 to 3 (0/1/2/3), where 0 indicates none to minimal damage and 3 indicates maximal damage. Overview of kidney genes associated with age. Chromosome numbers appear at the top of the circle and proceed clockwise. Track 1: The level of statistical significance (-log10P values) from meta-analysis of association between renal gene expression and age in the TRANScriptome of renaL humAn TissuE (TRANSLATE) Study and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Track 2: Symbols of 37 kidney genes associated with age in the meta-analysis of the TRANSLATE Study and TCGA after the correction for multiple testing. Track 3: Direction of association between expression of a gene and age (based on β-coefficients from the meta-analysis of the TRANSLATE Study and TCGA). Yellow, positive: gene is upregulated with increasing age; pink, negative: gene is downregulated with increasing age. Track 4: Prior evidence for association with aging determined via search of PubMed, GenAge, and AgeMap databases. Blue, genes previously associated with age; orange, no previous association with age. Track 5: Kidney genes associated with age in Nephroseq resource (red). Track 6: Kidney-specific (in purple) and ubiquitous (in green) signatures of age (based on the analysis of nonrenal tissues). Tracks 7 to 11: Associations between replicated age-related kidney genes and estimated glomerular filtration rate (track 7), glomerulosclerosis (track 8), interstitial fibrosis (track 9), tubular atrophy (track 10), and arterial/arteriolar narrowing (track 11). At least nominally significant associations are shown in blue.

Signatures of age on kidney transcriptome: replication analysis

We identified a total of 303 glomerular/renal cortex transcriptomes and 299 tubulointerstitial/renal medulla transcriptomes from eligible studies in Nephroseq. Of 37 age-associated genes, 32 were available for replication. Separate meta-analyses of renal cortex and medulla showed 12 and 18 associations with age, respectively, after correction for multiple testing (Supplementary Tables S4 and S5). A total of 19 kidney genes (59.3% of those available for this analysis) associated with age in the discovery analysis replicated in the same direction of association in Nephroseq (Figure 2). Additional sensitivity analysis showed that most (60%) of the age-associated genes that replicated exclusively in apparently healthy kidney tissues overlapped with those identified in the replication limited to samples from patients with kidney disease.23, 24

Ubiquitous and kidney-specific gene signatures of aging

Three (16%) of the replicated genes, EGF, EDH3, and LYG1, showed enriched kidney RNA/protein expression in the Human Protein Atlas (Supplementary Table S2). Although most of the age-associated kidney genes were abundant in other tissues, we reasoned that age-related changes in expression of these genes may be different compared with nonrenal tissues. To identify genes correlating with age exclusively in the kidney, we first conducted an association analysis between age and gene expression in 42 nonrenal Genotype–Tissue Expression (GTEx) project tissues from 532 individuals. The overview of the tissues included in this analysis and the demographic characteristics of the GTEx subjects are shown in Supplementary Tables S6 and S7. This analysis showed between 0 and 276 associations of age with gene expression in different tissues (Supplementary Table S6). All of our 19 replicated kidney genes were available for an overlap analysis with the transcriptomic signatures of age in the GTEx project (Supplementary Table S8). Under the initially selected statistical criteria, 15 (79%) of these showed no overlap with age-associated GTEx genes in this analysis (Figure 2 and Supplementary Table S8). Further sensitivity analyses were conducted under several alternative scenarios, with a different number of probabilistic estimations of expression residuals–derived factors in the nonrenal GTEx tissues. These showed that only 5 genes, comprising 26% of the replicated genes, showed no association with age in any of the statistical scenarios in any nonrenal tissues (Supplementary Table S9). As such, these genes, EDH3, ERP27, MAP4, PPP1R3C, and SNX24, represent tissue-specific signatures of age on the kidney transcriptome.

Robust gene signatures of kidney aging and their correlation with functional and structural dimensions of kidney health

Of 19 replicated genes, 14 showed at least 1 nominally significant association with 1 of 5 biochemical or histologic measures of renal functional and structural integrity known to deteriorate with age (i.e., estimated glomerular filtration rate, glomerulosclerosis, tubular atrophy, interstitial fibrosis, and arterial/arteriolar narrowing) in up to 160 individuals from the TRANSLATE Study (Supplementary Tables S10S14, Figure 2, and Supplementary Figure S2). The direction of these associations was always consistent with the expected age-related decline in kidney health. After correction for multiple testing, 10 genes retained their statistically significant associations with at least 1 measure of kidney health (Supplementary Tables S10S14 and Supplementary Figure S2), as follows: ATP1B2, EGF, EHD3, MAP4, SLPI, TMEM54, SLC16A5, ZNF518B, TRIM26, and TSPYL5. Statistically, the most significant relationship was detected between decreasing kidney expression of TSPYL5 and increasing arterial/arteriolar narrowing (P = 6.3 × 10-5, false discovery rate, 0.0015) (Supplementary Table S14). Further sensitivity analyses showed that age adjustment reduced or completely abolished the statistical significance of all genes (Supplementary Tables S10S14), consistent with a key role of aging in the uncovered associations between renal gene expression and indices of kidney health.

Cross-species validation of age-related human kidney genes in rodents

Of 19 genes showing association with human age at the renal expression level, 8 had murine homologs (Egf, Ltf, Lyg1, Phlda3, Slc16a5, Slpi, Snx24, and Vim) profiled on the gene expression microarray/available for in silico replication. The renal expression of 4 of these genes (Egf, Phlda3, Slpi, and Vim) showed a statistically significant association with murine age, at least at the nominal level of statistical significance (Supplementary Table S15). Phlda3, Slpi, and Vim also were associated with the histologic measure of age-related decline in kidney health, namely glomerular membrane thickening and tubular degeneration, in mice (Supplementary Table S15). In the absence of availability of TSPYL5 for validation in mice, we measured age-related changes in the expression of this gene in rat kidneys. This analysis showed reduced renal expression of TSPYL5 with age (Supplementary Figure S3). Collectively, these studies show a high level, approximately 50%, of cross-species replication of age-related kidney genes between man and rodents.

Immunohistochemistry of TSPYL5 in human kidneys

In kidneys from 9 TRANSLATE Study individuals, immunostaining for TSPYL5 detected a common pattern of signals in tubules, in a cytoplasmic location, with 2 representative samples shown in Figure 3. Further quantitative analysis of TSPYL5 immunostaining showed numerically lower signal intensity in kidneys from older individuals (age, >60 yr) when compared with those younger than 60 years, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.176) (Supplementary Figure S4).
Figure 3

Immunohistochemistry of TSPYL5 in human kidneys. (a,b,e,f) Sections were immunostained for TSPYL5 (brown signal), (c,d) except where the primary antibody was omitted. All sections were counterstained with hematoxylin (blue nuclei). (a) Low-power overview of kidney cortex of a 58-year-old individual showing glomeruli and tubules. (b) High-power view of boxed area in panel a. Larger tubules (t) have prominent TSPYL5 immunostaining, with a cytoplasmic pattern. Smaller tubules (arrows) in the fibrotic area (*) appear to have less prominent TSPYL5 signals. (c,d) Negative controls in which goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody was applied but the primary antibody was omitted. (e) Low-power overview of kidney cortex of an 81-year-old individual showing prominent zones of atrophic tubules and fibrosis. (f) High-power view from sample in panel e: in some tubules TSPYL5 signals appear confined to a subset of cells (arrow). Bars = (a,c,e) 200 μm, and (b,d,f) 50 μm. To optimize viewing of this image, please see the online version of this article at www.kidney-international.org.

Immunohistochemistry of TSPYL5 in human kidneys. (a,b,e,f) Sections were immunostained for TSPYL5 (brown signal), (c,d) except where the primary antibody was omitted. All sections were counterstained with hematoxylin (blue nuclei). (a) Low-power overview of kidney cortex of a 58-year-old individual showing glomeruli and tubules. (b) High-power view of boxed area in panel a. Larger tubules (t) have prominent TSPYL5 immunostaining, with a cytoplasmic pattern. Smaller tubules (arrows) in the fibrotic area (*) appear to have less prominent TSPYL5 signals. (c,d) Negative controls in which goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody was applied but the primary antibody was omitted. (e) Low-power overview of kidney cortex of an 81-year-old individual showing prominent zones of atrophic tubules and fibrosis. (f) High-power view from sample in panel e: in some tubules TSPYL5 signals appear confined to a subset of cells (arrow). Bars = (a,c,e) 200 μm, and (b,d,f) 50 μm. To optimize viewing of this image, please see the online version of this article at www.kidney-international.org.

Genetic regulation of renal expression of age-associated genes

To determine the extent of genotype-dependent variation in the expression of the 19 age-associated genes, we performed in-cis meta-expression quantitative trait locus analysis of the TRANSLATE Study and TCGA data with a window of 1 Mb. After correction for multiple testing, 4 (21%) genes, LTF, LYG1, PPP1R3C, and TSPYL5, showed significant correlations with 797 variants in-cis (Table 2 and Supplementary Tables S16 and S17). All most significant variants (best transcriptionally active single-nucleotide variants–best eSNPs) mapped to noncoding regions of the genome; 3 of them within actively transcribed chromatin regions in adult kidney tissue (Supplementary Table S18). Genotypes of the best eSNPs showed fairly constant effects on the age-related changes in renal gene expression (Supplementary Figure S5). We further examined associations between the genotypes of 797 PPP1R3C, TSPYL5, LYG1, and LTF eSNPs and estimated the glomerular filtration rate in 110,527 individuals from the CKDGen Consortium. Of 723 variants available for analysis, 105, 55, and 4 eSNPs in PPP1R3C, TSPYL5, and LYG1, respectively, showed an association with estimated glomerular filtration rate in the CKDGen Consortium, at least at the nominal level of statistical significance (Supplementary Table S19). The best eSNPs of PPP1R3C (rs7077656) and TSPYL5 (rs2567772) were among the eSNPs associated with an estimated glomerular filtration rate in the CKDGen Consortium. Thus, many genetic variants that control expression changes of kidney aging genes also are associated with a surrogate of kidney function.
Table 2

Association between age-related kidney genes and their best eSNPs: cis-expression quantitative locus meta-analysis of the TRANSLATE Study and TCGA

ChrGene symbolrsIDDistance from gene to SNP, base pairsAllelesβSEP valuePermutationP valueFDR
10PPP1R3Crs7077656–18,450A/G–0.4280.0625.44E-125.00E-041.64E-03
8TSPYL5rs2567772–4622G/A0.2870.0431.58E-115.00E-041.64E-03
3LTFrs67632800G/A0.2830.0434.48E-115.00E-041.64E-03
2LYG1rs673429020,339G/T–0.2440.0401.46E-095.00E-041.64E-03

Alleles, reference/alternate allele; β, coefficient from linear regression models; Chr, chromosome; FDR, false discovery rate; permutation P value, P value obtained based on 2000 permutations; rsID, reference SNP ID; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism.

Association between age-related kidney genes and their best eSNPs: cis-expression quantitative locus meta-analysis of the TRANSLATE Study and TCGA Alleles, reference/alternate allele; β, coefficient from linear regression models; Chr, chromosome; FDR, false discovery rate; permutation P value, P value obtained based on 2000 permutations; rsID, reference SNP ID; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism.

DNA methylation of age-associated genes and their expression

To investigate possible effects of DNA methylation on gene expression, we examined whether differences in CpG methylation of kidney DNA in proximity to 19 age-associated genes correlate with their renal expression in 78 TRANSLATE Study individuals. We examined the extent of DNA methylation in all CpG sites mapping to 1000 base pairs from either side of the age-associated gene. After correction for multiple testing, methylation of 1 gene, TSPYL5, showed an inverse association with its renal expression; the strongest association was identified for cg22328208 probe mapping to the TSPYL5 promoter (P = 2.3×10-4, Permutation P [Pperm] = 1 × 10-3, false discovery rate, 0.019) (Table 3, Supplementary Table S20, and Figure 4). We further confirmed that methylation of the TSPYL5 promoter was associated with a reduction in its expression using data generated in in vitro experiments (Supplementary Table S21).
Table 3

Associations between TSPYL5 CpG methylation, TSYL5 renal expression, and chronological age in the TRANSLATE Study

ChrCpG probeTraitβSEFDR
8cg22328208TSPYL5 expression–0.5450.1350.019
Age0.0160.004<0.001

β, coefficient from linear regression models; Chr, chromosome; CpG probe, DNA methylation probe; FDR, false discovery rate.

Figure 4

(a) Association between kidney expression of TSPYL5 and age in the meta-analysis of the TRANScriptome of renaL humAn TissuE (TRANSLATE) Study and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) study. Meta P value, level of statistical significance from the joint analysis; meta false discovery rate (FDR), the level of statistical significance after the correction for multiple testing. (b) Association between kidney expression of TSPYL5 and its best eSNP (rs256772) in the meta-analysis of TRANSLATE and TCGA studies. Meta P value, level of statistical significance from the meta-analysis; meta FDR, the level of statistical significance after the correction for multiple testing. (c) Trajectories of age-related reduction in kidney expression of TSPYL5 stratified on the genotype of rs256772 in the combined TRANSLATE and TCGA studies. (d) Association between kidney expression of TSPYL5 and the extent of renal DNA methylation within the cg22328208 probe in the TRANSLATE Study. P value, nominal level of statistical significance; FDR, the level of statistical significance after correction for multiple testing. (e) Association between the extent of renal DNA methylation within the cg22328208 probe and age in the TRANSLATE Study. P value, level of statistical significance. (f) Association between the extent of renal DNA methylation within the cg22328208 probe and its best single-nucleotide variant with effect on methylation (mSNP) (rs1367917). P value, nominal level of statistical significance. (g) Effect of age on the kidney expression of TSPYL5 is mediated through the extent of renal DNA methylation within cg22328208 in the TRANSLATE Study. (h) Effects of the best eSNP (rs256772) and the best mSNP (rs1367917) on the renal expression of TSPYL5 are mediated through the extent of renal DNA methylation within cg22328208 in the TRANSLATE Study. (i) The causal effect of methylation at cg22328208 on kidney expression of TSPYL5 using 6 independent genetic instruments (transcriptionally active single-nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs]) in Mendelian randomization by inverse variance weighting (orange line) and weighted median (blue line). The green dots with arrow bars represent genetic associations with kidney expression of TSPYL5 against genetic associations with cg22328208 methylation (with 95% confidence intervals). RBINT, rank-based inverse normal transformation.

Associations between TSPYL5 CpG methylation, TSYL5 renal expression, and chronological age in the TRANSLATE Study β, coefficient from linear regression models; Chr, chromosome; CpG probe, DNA methylation probe; FDR, false discovery rate. (a) Association between kidney expression of TSPYL5 and age in the meta-analysis of the TRANScriptome of renaL humAn TissuE (TRANSLATE) Study and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) study. Meta P value, level of statistical significance from the joint analysis; meta false discovery rate (FDR), the level of statistical significance after the correction for multiple testing. (b) Association between kidney expression of TSPYL5 and its best eSNP (rs256772) in the meta-analysis of TRANSLATE and TCGA studies. Meta P value, level of statistical significance from the meta-analysis; meta FDR, the level of statistical significance after the correction for multiple testing. (c) Trajectories of age-related reduction in kidney expression of TSPYL5 stratified on the genotype of rs256772 in the combined TRANSLATE and TCGA studies. (d) Association between kidney expression of TSPYL5 and the extent of renal DNA methylation within the cg22328208 probe in the TRANSLATE Study. P value, nominal level of statistical significance; FDR, the level of statistical significance after correction for multiple testing. (e) Association between the extent of renal DNA methylation within the cg22328208 probe and age in the TRANSLATE Study. P value, level of statistical significance. (f) Association between the extent of renal DNA methylation within the cg22328208 probe and its best single-nucleotide variant with effect on methylation (mSNP) (rs1367917). P value, nominal level of statistical significance. (g) Effect of age on the kidney expression of TSPYL5 is mediated through the extent of renal DNA methylation within cg22328208 in the TRANSLATE Study. (h) Effects of the best eSNP (rs256772) and the best mSNP (rs1367917) on the renal expression of TSPYL5 are mediated through the extent of renal DNA methylation within cg22328208 in the TRANSLATE Study. (i) The causal effect of methylation at cg22328208 on kidney expression of TSPYL5 using 6 independent genetic instruments (transcriptionally active single-nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs]) in Mendelian randomization by inverse variance weighting (orange line) and weighted median (blue line). The green dots with arrow bars represent genetic associations with kidney expression of TSPYL5 against genetic associations with cg22328208 methylation (with 95% confidence intervals). RBINT, rank-based inverse normal transformation.

Association between age, renal methylation, and expression of TSPYL5

We detected the association between age and 3 CpG probes associated with the expression of TSPYL5 in 93 TRANSLATE Study individuals (Supplementary Table S22). The positive association of cg22328208 methylation with age is in agreement with the demonstrated negative association between renal expression of TSPYL5 and a decrease in the kidney abundance of TSPYL5 with age (Table 3, Supplementary Table S22, and Figure 4). We then confirmed the association between cg22328208 methylation and age in an independent collection of 126 kidney samples from TCGA (Supplementary Table S23). Further mediation analysis in the TRANSLATE Study showed that the effect of age on cg22328208 is primary to changes in TSPYL5 expression in the kidney (P = 0.0118) (Figure 4). Collectively, these data show that age-related increase in methylation of the TSPYL5 promoter in the kidney translates into a decrease in the renal expression of TSPYL5.

Genotype-dependent effect on kidney DNA methylation of TSPYL5

Genetic variation is known as one of the regulatory mechanisms for CpG methylation in human tissues. Therefore, we sought to identify common variants associated with methylation of cg22328208 in 93 TRANSLATE Study individuals. This cis-methylation quantitative trait locus analysis used a window of 33,172 base pairs, the maximum distance between TSPYL5 and its eSNPs plus its own length, from the target CpG site and showed that after correction for multiple testing, cg22328208 was associated with 70 SNPs (Supplementary Table S24). The strongest association was identified for rs1367917 (Figure 4). These data confirmed that interindividual differences in renal DNA methylation of TSPYL5 are dependent on genotype.

Mediation analysis and causality between kidney methylation and expression of TSPYL5

We jointly investigated the identified cis-expression quantitative trait locus and cis-methylation quantitative trait locus of TSPYL5 in 93 TRANSLATE Study samples that had informative eQTL and mQTL data: 62 of 65 eSNPs overlapped with the set of 70 single-nucleotide variants with effect on methylation (mSNPs) (Supplementary Table S25). The mediation analysis based on the set of overlapping SNPs, TSPYL5 methylation, and expression was consistent with the epigenetic mediation model: both the best mSNP (rs1367917; P = 1.07 × 10-6) and the best eSNP (rs2567772; P = 1.32 × 10-3) were linked to TSPYL5 expression through cg22328208 methylation (Figure 4). Further Mendelian randomization using TSPYL5 SNPs as instruments, cg22328208 methylation as exposure, and TSPYL5 expression as outcome, and both inverse variance weighting and weighted median methods showed a causal effect of cg22328208 methylation on renal TSPYL5 expression; the effect estimates were -0.563 (95% confidence interval, -0.326 to -0.801) and -0.655 (95% confidence interval, -0.071 to -1.24) (Figure 4). The Mendelian randomization–Egger regression indicated that there was no pleiotropy of the instruments (P = 0.291).

Functional analysis of TSPYL5 locus in silico

We used Roadmap Epigenomics chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing data for 4 key histone modifications to determine chromatin state segmentation in an adult kidney and overlapped chromatin states and chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing signal intensity across the TSPYL5 locus (Supplementary Figure S6). The cg22328208 CpG site overlapped with the transcription start site of the TSPYL5 gene and is in a transcription start site chromatin region (1_TssA) in adult kidney tissue. It is part of a CpG island. Histone modification intensity in the region showed a strong enrichment for H3K4me3 (a mark of high specificity to promoter regions). The best eSNP (rs2567772) and mSNP (rs1367917) are 9.1 kb and 23.5 kb downstream from TSPYL5 and map to a weakly transcribed chromatin state (5_TxWk) and quiescent chromatin (15_Quies) in adult human kidney, respectively (Supplementary Table S26). Integrative analysis of high-resolution (5–10 kb) genome-wide high throughput chromosome confirmation capture chromatin interaction data showed statistically significant physical interactions between regions proximal to the mSNP and eSNP (or their proxies) and the promoter region of TSPYL5 (Supplementary Figure S6 and Supplementary Table S27).

Discussion

Our study provides several insights into age-related gene expression changes within the kidney. First, we identify genes whose expression not only robustly correlates with age in independent data sets but also is associated with biochemical/histologic measures of age-related changes in renal health. Second, we provide evidence for the key role of common genetic variants as determinants of lifelong, age-related changes in the renal signatures of aging. Finally, through integration of information from the genome, epigenome, and transcriptome we identify TSPYL5 as a robust gene whose age-related change in kidney expression is mediated through genetically determined hypermethylation of its promoter. Only 6 (31.6%) (EGF, LTF, SLPI, SLC16A5, VIM, and TSPYL5) of 19 robust signatures of age-related changes in kidney transcriptome were linked to human aging or age-related kidney diseases in previous studies. For example, EGF expression is known to correlate inversely with CKD, renal fibrosis, and rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis.23, 31 Changes in renal expression of 2 other genes (LTF and SLPI) were linked to acute kidney injury.32, 33 LTF is an antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant factor providing an innate line of defense against a host of injury stimuli. SLPI protects epithelial cells from the effects of inflammation and the activity of endogenous proteolytic enzymes.35, 36 To this end, the identified increase in the expression of LTF and SLP1 with age may represent a kidney repair mechanism in response to activation of aging-related processes in that organ. The degree of overlap between age-related genes and those that constitute the transcriptomic signatures of kidney injury identified before suggests the existence of a commonality in transcriptional pathways of renal damage repair irrespective of the initial insult. Our data link a majority of the replicated age-associated kidney genes to the functional and structural parameters of renal health known to deteriorate with age. Indeed, the age-related decline in glomerular filtration rate affects up to 57% to 85% of individuals in the general population.37, 38, 39 Glomerular sclerosis, interstitial fibrosis, tubular atrophy, and arterial narrowing represent the age-related changes in the structural microarchitecture of the kidney. Their gradual progression inevitably leads to a loss of functional nephron reserve and atrophy, increasing the susceptibility of elderly patients to severe presentations of CKD and other renal disorders. The associations between these phenotypes and our age-related genes suggest that a majority of the uncovered signatures are not silent bystanders but more likely are contributors to the key processes underpinning a gradual functional and structural involution of renal tissue with aging. We also show a powerful effect of the inherited variation in DNA sequence on the kidney expression of genes related to aging. Our data suggest that for approximately 1 in 5 renal genes robustly associated with age, common variants mapping to their proximity determine the lifelong pattern of their expression in the kidney. This means that the pace with which kidneys age is determined at least in part at birth and those who inherited a genotype promoting steeper expression changes of aging signatures may be at higher risk of age-related decline in kidney health (given the demonstrated overlap between age-related changes in renal gene expression and markers of functional and structural kidney damage). Thus, prediction of the magnitude of age-related changes in transcriptome based on genotype could lead to the development of new important diagnostic avenues. Indeed, noninvasive genotyping of faster renal aging risk variants might be an attractive strategy for early screening of age-related kidney diseases and suitability of organ donation in kidney transplantation. One of the most interesting genes uncovered by our study is TSPYL5, a member of the nucleosome assembly protein superfamily known for their role in transcriptional regulation and cell cycle. TSPYL5 was implicated in the processes operating at the intersection of cellular senescence and carcinogenesis. Specifically, TSPYL5 was suggested to impact on p53 expression and the activity of telomerase,41, 42 and was predicted to associate with telomere length. The recent in vitro TSPYL5 knockdown experiments in human pluripotent stem cells showed that silencing of this gene leads to changes in the expression of numerous pathways, including those responsible for changes in DNA conformation, epigenetics, and telomere organization. These processes map onto the basic molecular and cellular underpinnings of aging including regulation of chromatin architecture, epigenetic control of transcription, and cellular senescence. Our results show that an age-related decrease in the renal expression of TSPYL5 is most likely mediated directly by CpG methylation, with the strongest signal mapping to the 5’ region of the gene. Jung et al. determined that this segment of TSPYL5 including exon 1 contains the transcription start site and lies within a CpG island. This was supported by our analysis in silico. The association between the methylation and expression of TSPYL5 has been reported previously in other human tissues including both apparently healthy and diseased tissues.47, 48 The methylation of TSPYL5 also was associated with other age-related conditions including Huntington’s disease. Notably, the degree of hypermethylation of TSPYL5 promoter in the kidney remains under genetic control and is linked causally to the renal expression of this gene, but the strongest mSNP is located more than 20,000 base pairs from the TSPYL5 promoter. Similar intronic/intergenic SNPs distant to the methylated CpG sites were shown as the regulators of their methylation in previous studies. Our in silico studies further suggest that long-range chromatin interactions between the chromatin segments overlapping with the TSPYL5 promoter and the distant regions where the best mSNP maps are plausible explanations for the detected associations. Certainly, there were limitations of our analyses. The noncancerous renal tissues analyzed in both the TRANSLATE and TCGA cohorts were sourced from nephrectomies performed for primary kidney cancers. However, our previous investigations showed that the presence of cancer does not affect the transcriptome of kidney tissue collected from the cancer-unaffected part of the kidney. Moreover, the tissues within the replication resource that validated the associations between 19 renal genes and age came mostly from noncancer patients. Thus, it is unlikely that the history of renal cancer in the donors had a confounding effect on our results. We also appreciate the limited size of our kidney methylation data set in the TRANSLATE Study. The power limitation was the most likely reason why our study uncovered only 1 independent association between age-related gene expression and methylation after the stringent correction for multiple testing. However, 63% of our renal signatures showed nominally significant associations with kidney DNA methylation (Supplementary Table S20) and/or were correlated with CpG methylation in other human tissues.47, 51 Finally, we acknowledge the limitations of the quantitative analysis of TSPYL5 immunostaining restricted to 9 human kidneys. These samples represent only a small fraction of the set of renal tissues from more than 500 individuals examined at the transcriptome level. Thus, the arising results likely were underpowered for defining changes in the target protein with age. In the future, the complete spectrum of protein changes will need to be measured in several hundreds of samples using high-throughput proteomic approaches. Despite these caveats, our analysis linked age-related changes in kidney expression to genome and epigenome and show compelling evidence for promoter hypermethylation as the causal mechanism for an age-related decrease in renal expression of one of the uncovered signatures. We stress that our discovery analysis was based exclusively on RNA-seq, the state-of-the-art method of RNA profiling to measure transcript abundance. We also applied stringent statistical methods in the analyses of association between gene signatures and aging. Previous studies relying on much smaller numbers of kidney samples, collected largely in a similar manner to the TRANSLATE Study and TCGA but profiled using microarrays, used less-stringent statistical thresholds and lacked an independent replication. Therefore, it is not possible to exclude the role of a type 1 error in relation to approximately 1000 reported associations with age in these investigations. Most notably, the magnitude of discovery for age-associated kidney genes in our analysis is consistent with that for a majority of nonrenal GTEx tissues processed by RNA-seq and examined using similar statistical pipelines. Therefore, we are confident that the identified genes represent robust signatures of age on kidney transcriptome. In summary, with 260 kidneys examined at the discovery stage and more than 300 kidneys analyzed in the replication phase, our study was a large analysis of changes in the human renal transcriptome in relation to aging. We uncovered new robust gene signatures of kidney aging, showed their relevance to age-related decline in renal health, and demonstrated the potential of integrative -omics to uncover new regulatory mechanisms underpinning age-related changes in renal gene expression.

Methods

Discovery analysis of association between gene expression and chronological age was conducted using data from 2 projects: the TRANSLATE Study50, 52 and TCGA. First, separate analyses were performed on the 2 data sets, then the results were combined using an inverse-variance method. Kidney transcriptome profiling in both projects was conducted by RNA-seq. Replication analysis was conducted using data from Nephroseq, a platform of comprehensive renal disease gene expression data sets. Within Nephroseq, we performed an analysis of age-associated genes using a collection of apparently healthy renal tissue from Rodwell et al., and 2 data sets based on specimens from patients with kidney disease by Ju et al. and Sampson et al., separately in kidney cortex and medulla. The number of age-associated genes in 42 nonrenal tissues and the kidney specificity of replicated genes was examined using the data from the GTEx project.54, 55 Replicated genes were examined further for association with renal function and structure, age-related renal changes in rodents and cell lines, common genotypes (expression quantitative trait locus analysis), associations with CKD, and kidney DNA methylation. Kidney tissues immunostaining was performed using 2 antibodies raised against TSPYL5. Each antibody provided similar patterns on kidney cortex sections from 9 TRANSLATE Study individuals, spanning an age range of 30 to 81 years. The relevant DNA methylation sites were examined for association with chronological age and genotype (methylation quantitative trait locus analysis). Gene expression was quantified in transcripts per million and normalized using logarithmic transformation, quantile normalization, and rank-based inverse normal transformation in both the TRANSLATE Study and TCGA. The extent of technical variation in the normalized gene expression data was determined using the probabilistic estimation of the expression residual method. All association analyses were conducted using multiple linear regression controlling for sex, the top 3 genotype principal components, and technical factors if appropriate. The statistical significance was determined based on the false discovery rate either using the Benjamini–Hochberg method or the method of Storey et al.57, 58 We performed causal inference and mediation analysis and Mendelian randomization to explore the causal drivers of changes in gene expression. Bioinformatic analyses consisted of regulatory characterization of age-associated genes (Roadmap Epigenomics chromatin state), examining their organ specificity (Human Protein Atlas) and long-range chromatin interactions (high throughput chromosome confirmation capture data). Further details regarding the methods are provided in the Supplementary Data.

Disclosure

All the authors declared no competing interests.
  56 in total

Review 1.  Five years of GWAS discovery.

Authors:  Peter M Visscher; Matthew A Brown; Mark I McCarthy; Jian Yang
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  RNA-Seq and human complex diseases: recent accomplishments and future perspectives.

Authors:  Valerio Costa; Marianna Aprile; Roberta Esposito; Alfredo Ciccodicola
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Transcriptional analysis of the molecular basis of human kidney aging using cDNA microarray profiling.

Authors:  Anette Melk; Elaine S Mansfield; Szu-Chuan Hsieh; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Paul Grimm; David C Rayner; Philip F Halloran; Minnie M Sarwal
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 10.612

4.  Genetic control of individual differences in gene-specific methylation in human brain.

Authors:  Dandan Zhang; Lijun Cheng; Judith A Badner; Chao Chen; Qi Chen; Wei Luo; David W Craig; Margot Redman; Elliot S Gershon; Chunyu Liu
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Senescence and the renal vasculature in normal man.

Authors:  N K Hollenberg; D F Adams; H S Solomon; A Rashid; H L Abrams; J P Merrill
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 6.  Defining human diabetic nephropathy on the molecular level: integration of transcriptomic profiles with biological knowledge.

Authors:  Sebastian Martini; Felix Eichinger; Viji Nair; Matthias Kretzler
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.514

7.  Kidney transplants with progressing chronic diseases express high levels of acute kidney injury transcripts.

Authors:  K S Famulski; J Reeve; D G de Freitas; C Kreepala; J Chang; P F Halloran
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Testis specific Y-like 5: gene expression, methylation and implications for drug sensitivity in prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  Senthil R Kumar; Jeffrey N Bryan; Magda Esebua; James Amos-Landgraf; Tanner J May
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Renal Mechanisms of Association between Fibroblast Growth Factor 1 and Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Maciej Tomaszewski; James Eales; Matthew Denniff; Stephen Myers; Guat Siew Chew; Christopher P Nelson; Paraskevi Christofidou; Aishwarya Desai; Cara Büsst; Lukasz Wojnar; Katarzyna Musialik; Jacek Jozwiak; Radoslaw Debiec; Anna F Dominiczak; Gerjan Navis; Wiek H van Gilst; Pim van der Harst; Nilesh J Samani; Stephen Harrap; Pawel Bogdanski; Ewa Zukowska-Szczechowska; Fadi J Charchar
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 10.  DNA methylation and healthy human aging.

Authors:  Meaghan J Jones; Sarah J Goodman; Michael S Kobor
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 9.304

View more
  18 in total

1.  Variation in human herpesvirus 6B telomeric integration, excision, and transmission between tissues and individuals.

Authors:  Michael L Wood; Colin D Veal; Rita Neumann; Nicolás M Suárez; Jenna Nichols; Andrei J Parker; Diana Martin; Simon Pr Romaine; Veryan Codd; Nilesh J Samani; Adriaan A Voors; Maciej Tomaszewski; Louis Flamand; Andrew J Davison; Nicola J Royle
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Integrative Omics Analyses Reveal Epigenetic Memory in Diabetic Renal Cells Regulating Genes Associated With Kidney Dysfunction.

Authors:  Anita Bansal; Sreeram Balasubramanian; Sangeeta Dhawan; Amy Leung; Zhen Chen; Rama Natarajan
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 9.461

3.  Uncovering genetic mechanisms of hypertension through multi-omic analysis of the kidney.

Authors:  James M Eales; Xiao Jiang; Xiaoguang Xu; Sushant Saluja; Artur Akbarov; Eddie Cano-Gamez; Michelle T McNulty; Christopher Finan; Hui Guo; Wojciech Wystrychowski; Monika Szulinska; Huw B Thomas; Sanjeev Pramanik; Sandesh Chopade; Priscilla R Prestes; Ingrid Wise; Evangelos Evangelou; Mahan Salehi; Yusif Shakanti; Mikael Ekholm; Matthew Denniff; Alicja Nazgiewicz; Felix Eichinger; Bradley Godfrey; Andrzej Antczak; Maciej Glyda; Robert Król; Stephen Eyre; Jason Brown; Carlo Berzuini; John Bowes; Mark Caulfield; Ewa Zukowska-Szczechowska; Joanna Zywiec; Pawel Bogdanski; Matthias Kretzler; Adrian S Woolf; David Talavera; Bernard Keavney; Pasquale Maffia; Tomasz J Guzik; Raymond T O'Keefe; Gosia Trynka; Nilesh J Samani; Aroon Hingorani; Matthew G Sampson; Andrew P Morris; Fadi J Charchar; Maciej Tomaszewski
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 41.307

Review 4.  Advances of single-cell genomics and epigenomics in human disease: where are we now?

Authors:  Rizqah Kamies; Celia P Martinez-Jimenez
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 5.  Inflammaging and Complement System: A Link Between Acute Kidney Injury and Chronic Graft Damage.

Authors:  Rossana Franzin; Alessandra Stasi; Marco Fiorentino; Giovanni Stallone; Vincenzo Cantaluppi; Loreto Gesualdo; Giuseppe Castellano
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 6.  Congenital Disorders of the Human Urinary Tract: Recent Insights From Genetic and Molecular Studies.

Authors:  Adrian S Woolf; Filipa M Lopes; Parisa Ranjzad; Neil A Roberts
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 3.418

7.  Gene Expression as a Guide to the Development of Novel Therapies in Primary Glomerular Diseases.

Authors:  Panagiotis Garantziotis; Stavros A P Doumas; Ioannis Boletis; Eleni Frangou
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Plasma Proteomics of Renal Function: A Trans-ethnic Meta-analysis and Mendelian Randomization Study.

Authors:  Pamela Matías-García; Rory Wilson; Qi Guo; Shaza Zaghlool; James Eales; Xiaoguang Xu; Fadi Charchar; John Dormer; Haifa Maalmi; Pascal Schlosser; Mohamed Elhadad; Jana Nano; Sapna Sharma; Annette Peters; Alessia Fornoni; Dennis Mook-Kanamori; Juliane Winkelmann; John Danesh; Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Willem Ouwehand; Nicholas Watkins; David Roberts; Agnese Petrera; Johannes Graumann; Wolfgang Koenig; Kristian Hveem; Christian Jonasson; Anna Köttgen; Adam Butterworth; Marco Prunotto; Stefanie Hauck; Christian Herder; Karsten Suhre; Christian Gieger; Maciej Tomaszewski; Alexander Teumer; Melanie Waldenberger
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 14.978

Review 9.  Transplantation of Marginal Organs: Immunological Aspects and Therapeutic Perspectives in Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Johan Noble; Thomas Jouve; Paolo Malvezzi; Caner Süsal; Lionel Rostaing
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 7.561

10.  Hypertension and renin-angiotensin system blockers are not associated with expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in the kidney.

Authors:  Xiao Jiang; James M Eales; David Scannali; Alicja Nazgiewicz; Priscilla Prestes; Michelle Maier; Matthew Denniff; Xiaoguang Xu; Sushant Saluja; Eddie Cano-Gamez; Wojciech Wystrychowski; Monika Szulinska; Andrzej Antczak; Sean Byars; Damian Skrypnik; Maciej Glyda; Robert Król; Joanna Zywiec; Ewa Zukowska-Szczechowska; Louise M Burrell; Adrian S Woolf; Adam Greenstein; Pawel Bogdanski; Bernard Keavney; Andrew P Morris; Anthony Heagerty; Bryan Williams; Stephen B Harrap; Gosia Trynka; Nilesh J Samani; Tomasz J Guzik; Fadi J Charchar; Maciej Tomaszewski
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.