| Literature DB >> 30784220 |
Joel S Svensson1, Emma Westerlind1, Hanna C Persson1, Katharina S Sunnerhagen1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the incidence and number of occupational gaps 5 years after stroke and find possible predictors and explanatory factors for increased number of experienced gaps.Entities:
Keywords: follow-up; occupational gaps; participation; stroke
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30784220 PMCID: PMC6422817 DOI: 10.1002/brb3.1234
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Behav Impact factor: 2.708
Figure 1Flow chart of the study population
Baseline characteristics of the study population
| Age | |
| Mean ( | 63.0 (14) |
| Median (min‐max) | 64 (24–90) |
| Gender, | |
| Male | 121 (62.4) |
| Female | 73 (37.6) |
| Type of stroke, | |
| IS | 143 (73.7) |
| ICH | 27 (13.9) |
| SAH | 24 (12.3) |
| NIHSS score at admission, | |
| Very mild 0–2 | 96 (62.7) |
| Mild 2–4 | 15 (9.8) |
| Moderate 5–15 | 28 (18.3) |
| Severe 16–46 | 14 (9.2) |
| Mean ( | 4.0 (5.8) |
| Median (min‐max) | 1 (0–24) |
| MRS at discharge, | |
| 0 | 3 (1.5) |
| 1 | 26 (13.4) |
| 2 | 64 (33.0) |
| 3 | 54 (27.8) |
| 4 | 40 (20.6) |
| 5 | 7 (3.6) |
| H&H, | |
| Grade 1 | 2 (9,1) |
| Grade 2 | 12 (54.5) |
| Grade 3 | 2 (9.1) |
| Grade 4 | 5 (22.7) |
| Grade 5 | 1 (4.5) |
| Stroke severity, | |
| Very mild to mild (NIHSS), Grade 1–2 (H&H) | 126 (71.6) |
| Moderate to severe (NIHSS), Grade 3–5 (H&H) | 50 (28.4) |
| Stroke location, | |
| Left hemisphere | 92 (53.2) |
| Right hemisphere | 64 (37.0) |
| Bilateral | 7 (4.0) |
| Cerebellum | 4 (2.3) |
| Unknown | 6 (3.5) |
IS: ischemic stroke; ICH: intra cerebral hemorrhage; SAH: sub arachnoidal hemorrhage; NIHSS National Institute of Health's Stroke Scale; mRS: modified Rankin Scale, H&H: Hunt and Hess.
Number and types of occupational gaps in each activity in the Occupational Gaps Questionnaire
| Activity | Total | Total gaps | WTD gaps | DNWTD gaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instrumental ADL | ||||
| Grocery shopping | 188 | 15 (8.0) | 11 (5.9) | 4 (2.1) |
| Cooking | 190 | 31 (16.3) | 23 (12.1) | 8 (4.2) |
| Laundry | 189 | 32 (16.9) | 15 (7.9) | 17 (9.0) |
| Cleaning | 190 | 40 (21.0) | 16 (8.4) | 24 (12.6) |
| Performing light maintenance | 190 | 30 (15.8) | 21 (11.1) | 9 (4.7) |
| Performing heavy maintenance | 190 | 33 (17.3) | 28 (14.7) | 5 (2.6) |
| Personal finance | 192 | 24 (15.5) | 16 (8.3) | 8 (4.2) |
| Transporting oneself | 192 | 27 (14.1) | 24 (12.5) | 3 (1.6) |
| Leisure activities | ||||
| Shopping | 194 | 30 (15.5) | 18 (9.3) | 12 (6.2) |
| Participating in sports | 192 | 43 (24.4) | 42 (21.9) | 1 (0.5) |
| Outdoor life | 193 | 41 (21.3) | 37 (19.2) | 4 (2.1) |
| Hobbies | 194 | 48 (24.7) | 45 (23.2) | 3 (1.5) |
| Cultural activities | 193 | 31 (16.0) | 29 (15.0) | 2 (1.0) |
| TV/video/radio | 194 | 2 (1.0) | 1 (0.5) | 1 (0.5) |
| Reading newspapers | 194 | 16 (8.2) | 15 (7.7) | 1 (0.5) |
| Reading books or periodicals | 193 | 27 (14.0) | 23 (11.9) | 4 (2.1) |
| Writing | 194 | 36 (18.6) | 32 (16.5) | 4 (2.1) |
| Playing the lottery etc. | 191 | 30 (15.7) | 27 (14,1) | 3 (1.6) |
| Using the computer | 193 | 17 (8.9) | 14 (7.3) | 3 (1.6) |
| Social activities | ||||
| Visiting partner/children | 190 | 13 (6.9) | 11 (5.8) | 2 (1.1) |
| Visiting relatives/friends | 194 | 15 (7.7) | 13 (6.7) | 2 (1.0) |
| Helping others | 191 | 31 (16.2) | 30 (15.7) | 1 (0.5) |
| Engaging in societies, clubs, or unions | 194 | 32 (16.4) | 29 (14.9) | 3 (1.5) |
| Participating in religious activities | 191 | 5 (2.6) | 5 (2.6) | 0 (0) |
| Visiting restaurants and bars | 193 | 25 (12.9) | 23 (11.9) | 2 (1.0) |
| Travelling for pleasure | 194 | 41 (21.1) | 37 (19.1) | 4 (2.1) |
| Work or work‐related activities | ||||
| Working | 193 | 16 (8.3) | 15 (7.8) | 1 (0.5) |
| Studying | 191 | 18 (9.4) | 17 (8.9) | 1 (0.5) |
| Taking care of and raising children | 191 | 11 (5.7) | 10 (5.2) | 1 (0.5) |
| Performing voluntary work | 192 | 18 (9.4) | 17 (8.9) | 1 (0.5) |
WTD: want to do; DNWTD: do not want to do.
Figure 2Different types of gaps for each activity in the Occupational Gaps Questionnaire (WTDG: want to do gaps; DNWTDG: do not want to do gaps)
Figure 3Illustration of the model building in the two logistic regression models (mRS: modified Rankin Scale)
Predictive and explanatory regression models for having more occupational gaps than the reference population
| Wald |
| Exp (B) (OR) | 95% C.I. for OR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predictive model | ||||
| Age at stroke onset | 11.370 | 0.001 | 1.045 | 1.018–1.072 |
| Functional dependency (mRS) | 10.507 | 0.001 | 3.224 | 1.558–6.542 |
| Stroke severity | 0.250 | 0.617 | 1.223 | 0.556–2.691 |
| Hosmer and Lemeshow | Chi‐2 df | 8.790 8 0.360 | ||
| Cox & Snell | R2 | 0.163 | ||
| Nagelkerke | R2 | 0.218 | ||
| ROC‐curve | Area under curve | 0.738 <0.001 | ||
| Explanatory model | ||||
| Age at time of follow‐up | 12.375 | <0.001 | 1.043 | 1.019–1.068 |
| Feelings of depression | 10.266 | 0.001 | 5.330 | 1.915–14.832 |
| Hosmer and Lemeshow | Chi‐2 df | 10.106 8 0.258 | ||
| Cox & Snell | R2 | 0.117 | ||
| Nagelkerke | R2 | 0.155 | ||
| ROC‐curve | Area under curve | 0.711 <0.001 | ||
mRS: modified Rankin Scale; OR: odds ration; CI: Confidence Interval; df: degrees of freedom; ROC: receiver operator characteristics.