Literature DB >> 30782807

Role of forest regrowth in global carbon sink dynamics.

Thomas A M Pugh1,2, Mats Lindeskog3, Benjamin Smith3,4, Benjamin Poulter5,6, Almut Arneth7, Vanessa Haverd8, Leonardo Calle5.   

Abstract

Although the existence of a large carbon sink in terrestrial ecosystems is well-established, the drivers of this sink remain uncertain. It has been suggested that perturbations to forest demography caused by past land-use change, management, and natural disturbances may be causing a large component of current carbon uptake. Here we use a global compilation of forest age observations, combined with a terrestrial biosphere model with explicit modeling of forest regrowth, to partition the global forest carbon sink between old-growth and regrowth stands over the period 1981-2010. For 2001-2010 we find a carbon sink of 0.85 (0.66-0.96) Pg year-1 located in intact old-growth forest, primarily in the moist tropics and boreal Siberia, and 1.30 (1.03-1.96) Pg year-1 located in stands regrowing after past disturbance. Approaching half of the sink in regrowth stands would have occurred from demographic changes alone, in the absence of other environmental changes. These age-constrained results show consistency with those simulated using an ensemble of demographically-enabled terrestrial biosphere models following an independent reconstruction of historical land use and management. We estimate that forests will accumulate an additional 69 (44-131) Pg C in live biomass from changes in demography alone if natural disturbances, wood harvest, and reforestation continue at rates comparable to those during 1981-2010. Our results confirm that it is not possible to understand the current global terrestrial carbon sink without accounting for the sizeable sink due to forest demography. They also imply that a large portion of the current terrestrial carbon sink is strictly transient in nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carbon sink; demography; disturbance; forest; regrowth

Year:  2019        PMID: 30782807      PMCID: PMC6410874          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1810512116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  23 in total

1.  Forest age improves understanding of the global carbon sink.

Authors:  Kai Zhu; Yiluan Song; Clara Qin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Recent increases in drought frequency cause observed multi-year drought legacies in the tree rings of semi-arid forests.

Authors:  Paul Szejner; Soumaya Belmecheri; James R Ehleringer; Russell K Monson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  Terrestrial carbon sinks in China and around the world and their contribution to carbon neutrality.

Authors:  Yuanhe Yang; Yue Shi; Wenjuan Sun; Jinfeng Chang; Jianxiao Zhu; Leiyi Chen; Xin Wang; Yanpei Guo; Hongtu Zhang; Lingfei Yu; Shuqing Zhao; Kang Xu; Jiangling Zhu; Haihua Shen; Yuanyuan Wang; Yunfeng Peng; Xia Zhao; Xiangping Wang; Huifeng Hu; Shiping Chen; Mei Huang; Xuefa Wen; Shaopeng Wang; Biao Zhu; Shuli Niu; Zhiyao Tang; Lingli Liu; Jingyun Fang
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 6.038

4.  Warm springs alter timing but not total growth of temperate deciduous trees.

Authors:  Cameron Dow; Albert Y Kim; Loïc D'Orangeville; Erika B Gonzalez-Akre; Ryan Helcoski; Valentine Herrmann; Grant L Harley; Justin T Maxwell; Ian R McGregor; William J McShea; Sean M McMahon; Neil Pederson; Alan J Tepley; Kristina J Anderson-Teixeira
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 69.504

5.  Insect herbivory within modern forests is greater than fossil localities.

Authors:  Lauren Azevedo-Schmidt; Emily K Meineke; Ellen D Currano
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 12.779

6.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of forest ecosystem carbon budget in Guizhou: customisation and application of the CBM-CFS3 model for China.

Authors:  Yuzhi Tang; Quanqin Shao; Tiezhu Shi; Zhensheng Lu; Guofeng Wu
Journal:  Carbon Balance Manag       Date:  2022-07-02

7.  The fate of carbon in a mature forest under carbon dioxide enrichment.

Authors:  Mingkai Jiang; Belinda E Medlyn; John E Drake; Remko A Duursma; Ian C Anderson; Craig V M Barton; Matthias M Boer; Yolima Carrillo; Laura Castañeda-Gómez; Luke Collins; Kristine Y Crous; Martin G De Kauwe; Bruna M Dos Santos; Kathryn M Emmerson; Sarah L Facey; Andrew N Gherlenda; Teresa E Gimeno; Shun Hasegawa; Scott N Johnson; Astrid Kännaste; Catriona A Macdonald; Kashif Mahmud; Ben D Moore; Loïc Nazaries; Elizabeth H J Neilson; Uffe N Nielsen; Ülo Niinemets; Nam Jin Noh; Raúl Ochoa-Hueso; Varsha S Pathare; Elise Pendall; Johanna Pihlblad; Juan Piñeiro; Jeff R Powell; Sally A Power; Peter B Reich; Alexandre A Renchon; Markus Riegler; Riikka Rinnan; Paul D Rymer; Roberto L Salomón; Brajesh K Singh; Benjamin Smith; Mark G Tjoelker; Jennifer K M Walker; Agnieszka Wujeska-Klause; Jinyan Yang; Sönke Zaehle; David S Ellsworth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Number of growth days and not length of the growth period determines radial stem growth of temperate trees.

Authors:  Sophia Etzold; Frank Sterck; Arun K Bose; Sabine Braun; Nina Buchmann; Werner Eugster; Arthur Gessler; Ansgar Kahmen; Richard L Peters; Yann Vitasse; Lorenz Walthert; Kasia Ziemińska; Roman Zweifel
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 11.274

9.  Contribution of land use to the interannual variability of the land carbon cycle.

Authors:  Chao Yue; Philippe Ciais; Richard A Houghton; Alexander A Nassikas
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Experimental evidence shows minor contribution of nitrogen deposition to global forest carbon sequestration.

Authors:  Lena F Schulte-Uebbing; Gerard H Ros; Wim de Vries
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 13.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.