| Literature DB >> 30781460 |
Wei-Yi Shih1, Chia-Chen Chang2, Meng-Ting Tsou3, Hsin-Lung Chan4, Ying-Ju Chen5, Lee-Ching Hwang6,7.
Abstract
Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common infection worldwide. Numerous studies have demonstrated risk factors for UTI in facilities and communities. In this study, we aimed to identify risk factors for UTI in home care patients. Patients who received home care for at least three months in 2017 were included. A UTI episode was defined by admission for UTI treatment, and/or a visit to an outpatient department for UTI and receiving antibiotic prescription. A total of 598 patients aged 81.9 years were included. Overall 47% (281) had at least one UTI episode. After analysis, urinary catheter indwelling was the most important risk factor (odds ratio (OR), 3.21). Underlying diseases (coronary artery disease (CAD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetes mellitus (DM)) were related to UTI with OR ranging from 1.46 to 1.79. Higher Alb (albumin) (OR 0.68) and Hb (hemoglobin) (OR 0.91) were inversely related to UTI. Polypharmacy (OR 1.84) and lower Barthel index scores (OR 1.62) were also related to UTI by different degrees. In conclusion, apart from the unmodifiable factors, avoiding prolonged urinary catheter placement, unnecessary prescriptions, and keeping good nutritional status may help to prevent UTI in home care patients.Entities:
Keywords: home care; risk factors; urinary tract infection
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30781460 PMCID: PMC6406410 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16040566
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Basic characteristics of the study population (N = 598).
| Variables | n (%) or Mean ± SD |
|---|---|
|
| 81.9 ± 11.3 |
|
| 236 (39.5) |
|
| 362 (60.5) |
|
| 318 (53.2) |
|
| 15 (2.5) |
|
| 265 (44.3) |
|
| 22.0 ± 3.6 |
|
| 109 (18.2) |
|
| 267 (44.6) |
|
| 185 (30.9) |
|
| 301 (50.3) |
|
| 98 (16.4) |
|
| 478 (79.9) |
|
| 278 (46.5) |
|
| 209 (34.9) |
|
| 208 (34.8) |
|
| 123 (20.6) |
|
| 97 (16.2) |
|
| 125 (20.9) |
|
| 292 (48.8) |
|
| 207 (34.6) |
|
| 99 (16.6) |
|
| 379 (63.4) |
|
| 301 (50.3) |
|
| 489 (81.8) |
|
| 109 (18.2) |
|
| 509 (85.1) |
|
| 82 (13.7) |
|
| 7 (1.2) |
|
| 450 (75.3) |
|
| 128 (21.4) |
|
| 20 (3.3) |
|
| 11.2 ± 2.7 |
|
| 4 (0.8) |
|
| 269 (56.9) |
|
| 200 (42.3) |
|
| 10.9 ± 1.8 |
|
| 3.8 ± 0.6 |
SD = standard deviation; BMI = body mass index; GCS = Glasgow coma scale; MNA = mini-nutritional assessment.
Comparison of baseline characteristics between UTI # and non-UTI groups.
| Variable * | UTI (−) n = 317 (53%) | UTI (+) n = 281 (47%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 81.6 ± 11.4 | 82.4 ± 11.2 | 0.603 |
|
| 132 (41.6%) | 104 (37%) | 0.276 |
|
| 185 (58.4%) | 177 (63%) | |
|
| 165 (52.1%) | 153 (54.4%) | 0.074 |
|
| 4 (1.3%) | 11 (3.9%) | |
|
| 148 (46.7%) | 117 (41.6%) | |
|
| 21.9 ± 3.4 | 22.2 ± 3.9 | 0.27 |
|
| 45 (14.2%) | 64 (22.8%) | 0.008 |
|
| 125 (39.4%) | 142 (50.5%) | 0.007 |
|
| 94 (29.7%) | 91 (32.4%) | 0.48 |
|
| 160 (50.5%) | 141 (50.2%) | 1 |
|
| 50 (15.8%) | 48 (17.1%) | 0.74 |
|
| 250 (78.9%) | 228 (81.1%) | 0.54 |
|
| 133 (42%) | 145 (51.6%) | 0.021 |
|
| 107 (33.8%) | 102 (36.3%) | 0.548 |
|
| 100 (31.5%) | 108 (38.4%) | 0.086 |
|
| 62 (19.6%) | 61 (21.7%) | 0.544 |
|
| 51 (16.1%) | 46 (16.4%) | 1 |
|
| 51(16.1%) | 74 (26.3%) | 0.002 |
|
| 154 (48.6%) | 138 (49.1%) | 0.99 |
|
| 110 (34.7%) | 97 (34.5%) | |
|
| 53 (16.7%) | 46 (16.4%) | |
|
| 2 (0.8%) | 2 (0.9%) | 0.306 |
|
| 130 (53.5%) | 139 (60.4%) | |
|
| 111 (45.7%) | 89 (38.7%) | |
|
| 197 (62.1%) | 182 (64.8%) | 0.506 |
|
| 117 (36.9%) | 184 (65.5%) | <0.001 |
|
| 248 (78.2%) | 241 (85.8%) | 0.017 |
|
| 69 (21.8%) | 40 (14.2%) | |
|
| 250 (78.9%) | 259 (92.2%) | <0.001 |
|
| 62 (19.6%) | 20 (7.1%) | |
|
| 5 (1.6%) | 2 (0.7%) | |
|
| 235 (74.1%) | 215 (76.5%) | 0.52 |
|
| 69 (21.8%) | 59 (21.0%) | |
|
| 13 (4.1%) | 7 (2.5%) | |
|
| 11.3 ± 2.9 | 11.0 ± 2.4 | 0.2 |
|
| 11.1 ± 1.9 | 10.8 ± 1.7 | 0.024 |
|
| 3.9 ± 0.6 | 3.8 ± 0.6 | 0.002 |
# The study population was divided into 2 groups: those who had at least one UTI episode during the observation period were designated as UTI (+) group, and those who never had such infection were UTI (−) group. A UTI episode during the observation period was defined by either admission for UTI treatment or visit to outpatient department for UTI and receiving antibiotic prescription. UTI diagnosis was confirmed by ICD-10-CM codes recorded in medical documents. For more information, please refer to the Material and Methods section. * Data are presented as number (percent) or mean ± SD.; SD = standard deviation; BMI = body mass index; GCS = Glasgow coma scale; MNA = mini-nutritional assessment.
Age and sex-adjusted multiple logistic regression analysis of risk factors for UTI.
| Variable | OR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 3.21 | 2.30–4.50 | <0.001 |
|
| 1.79 | 1.17–2.73 | 0.007 |
|
| 1.54 | 1.11–2.14 | 0.011 |
|
| 1.46 | 1.05–2.02 | 0.024 |
|
| 1.84 | 1.23–2.75 | 0.003 |
|
| 1.62 | 1.04–2.53 | 0.032 |
|
| 0.68 | 0.52–0.89 | 0.004 |
|
| 0.91 | 0.82–0.995 | 0.040 |
OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval.