Jingjing Shang1, Elaine Larson2, Jianfang Liu2, Patricia Stone2. 1. School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, NY. Electronic address: js4032@columbia.edu. 2. School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients in home health care (HHC), the fastest growing health care sector, are at risk for infection. The existing research on infection in HHC is often limited by small sample sizes, local scope of inquiry, and a lack of current data. There is no national study examining agency-level infection rates. METHODS: This secondary data analysis used a 20% random sample of the 2010 national Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) data. An infection case was identified when the HHC patient was hospitalized or received emergency care for respiratory infection, urinary tract infection, intravenous catheter-related infection, wound infection, or deterioration. Proportions of infection cases out of the total number of patients were calculated for the whole sample and for each HHC agency. RESULTS: The final analysis included 199,462 patients from 8,255 HHC agencies. Approximately 3.5% of patients developed infections during their HHC stay, leading to emergency care treatment or hospitalization. Seventeen percent of unplanned hospitalizations among HHC patients were caused by infections. The agency-level infection rate ranged from 0%-34%, with an average of 3.5%. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the proportion of hospitalizations or emergency care treatment caused by infection in HHC and the agency-level infection rate at a national level by using OASIS data. These data demonstrate that infection is a serious problem in HHC, and infection rates varied between agencies. The variance in agency level rates may be caused by differences in infection control policies and practices. Better infection surveillance system in HHC is needed to benchmark quality of care.
BACKGROUND:Patients in home health care (HHC), the fastest growing health care sector, are at risk for infection. The existing research on infection in HHC is often limited by small sample sizes, local scope of inquiry, and a lack of current data. There is no national study examining agency-level infection rates. METHODS: This secondary data analysis used a 20% random sample of the 2010 national Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) data. An infection case was identified when the HHC patient was hospitalized or received emergency care for respiratory infection, urinary tract infection, intravenous catheter-related infection, wound infection, or deterioration. Proportions of infection cases out of the total number of patients were calculated for the whole sample and for each HHC agency. RESULTS: The final analysis included 199,462 patients from 8,255 HHC agencies. Approximately 3.5% of patients developed infections during their HHC stay, leading to emergency care treatment or hospitalization. Seventeen percent of unplanned hospitalizations among HHC patients were caused by infections. The agency-level infection rate ranged from 0%-34%, with an average of 3.5%. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the proportion of hospitalizations or emergency care treatment caused by infection in HHC and the agency-level infection rate at a national level by using OASIS data. These data demonstrate that infection is a serious problem in HHC, and infection rates varied between agencies. The variance in agency level rates may be caused by differences in infection control policies and practices. Better infection surveillance system in HHC is needed to benchmark quality of care.
Authors: Mary H Wilde; Judith Brasch; Kathryn Getliffe; Kathleen A Brown; James M McMahon; Joyce A Smith; Elizabeth Anson; Wan Tang; Xin Tu Journal: J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs Date: 2010 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.741
Authors: R Monina Klevens; Jonathan R Edwards; Chesley L Richards; Teresa C Horan; Robert P Gaynes; Daniel A Pollock; Denise M Cardo Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2007 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: E Yoko Furuya; Andrew Dick; Eli N Perencevich; Monika Pogorzelska; Donald Goldmann; Patricia W Stone Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-01-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Dawn Dowding; David Russell; Margaret V McDonald; Marygrace Trifilio; Jiyoun Song; Carlin Brickner; Jingjing Shang Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2021-02-15 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Andrew W Dick; Meghan T Murray; Ashley M Chastain; Elizabeth A Madigan; Mark Sorbero; Patricia W Stone; Jingjing Shang Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2019-05-07 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: David Russell; Dawn W Dowding; Margaret V McDonald; Victoria Adams; Robert J Rosati; Elaine L Larson; Jingjing Shang Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2018-06-14 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Jordan M Harrison; Andrew W Dick; Patricia W Stone; Ashley M Chastain; Mark Sorbero; E Yoko Furuya; Jingjing Shang Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2021-06-21 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Kyungmi Woo; Victoria Adams; Paula Wilson; Li-Heng Fu; Kenrick Cato; Sarah Collins Rossetti; Margaret McDonald; Jingjing Shang; Maxim Topaz Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2021-01-09 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Dawn Dowding; David Russell; Marygrace Trifilio; Margaret V McDonald; Jingjing Shang Journal: Int J Nurs Stud Date: 2020-05-08 Impact factor: 5.837
Authors: Chenjuan Ma; Margaret V McDonald; Penny H Feldman; Sarah Miner; Simon Jones; Allison Squires Journal: Med Care Date: 2021-10-01 Impact factor: 3.178