| Literature DB >> 30779732 |
Luísa Camacho1, Camila S Silva1, Joseph P Hanig2, Robert P Schleimer3, Nysia I George4, John F Bowyer5.
Abstract
This work extends the understanding of how toxic exposures to amphetamine (AMPH) adversely affect the immune system and lead to tissue damage. Importantly, it determines which effects of AMPH are and are not due to pronounced hyperthermia. Whole blood messenger RNA (mRNA) and whole blood and serum microRNA (miRNA) transcripts were identified in adult male Sprague-Dawley rats after exposure to toxic AMPH under normothermic conditions, AMPH when it produces pronounced hyperthermia, or environmentally-induced hyperthermia (EIH). mRNA transcripts with large increases in fold-change in treated relative to control rats and very low expression in the control group were a rich source of organ-specific transcripts in blood. When severe hyperthermia was produced by either EIH or AMPH, significant increases in circulating organ-specific transcripts for liver (Alb, Fbg, F2), pancreas (Spink1), bronchi/lungs (F3, Cyp4b1), bone marrow (Np4, RatNP-3b), and kidney (Cesl1, Slc22a8) were observed. Liver damage was suggested also by increased miR-122 levels in the serum. Increases in muscle/heart-enriched transcripts were produced by AMPH even in the absence of hyperthermia. Expression increases in immune-related transcripts, particularly Cd14 and Vcan, indicate that AMPH can activate the innate immune system in the absence of hyperthermia. Most transcripts specific for T-cells decreased 50-70% after AMPH exposure or EIH, with the noted exception of Ccr5 and Chst12. This is probably due to T-cells leaving the circulation and down-regulation of these genes. Transcript changes specific for B-cells or B-lymphoblasts in the AMPH and EIH groups ranged widely from decreasing ≈ 40% (Cd19, Cd180) to increasing 30 to 100% (Tk1, Ahsa1) to increasing ≥500% (Stip1, Ackr3). The marked increases in Ccr2, Ccr5, Pld1, and Ackr3 produced by either AMPH or EIH observed in vivo provide further insight into the initial immune system alterations that result from methamphetamine and AMPH abuse and could modify risk for HIV and other viral infections.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30779732 PMCID: PMC6380594 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210273
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1PCA and venn diagram analysis.
A. Principal component analysis score plot (3 principal components) of AMPH normo, AMPH hyper, EIH, and control treatment groups. B. Venn diagram showing the overlap of significant transcripts between the three main pairwise comparisons based on RNA-seq data analysis.
List of animal IDs included in mRNA and miRNA analyses.
| Animals used to determine RNA-seq profiles in whole blood | Animals used to determine the miRNA profiles in whole blood | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Group | Individual Animal IDs | Sample Size | Individual Animal IDs | Sample Size |
| 13 ( | ML322, | |||
| 13 ( | JB93, | |||
| 14 ( | ||||
| 16 ( | ||||
a IDs are the same as listed in the GSE62368 and GSE64778 files
b Underlined IDs, blood samples were used in follow-up RT-qPCR analyses. The remaining samples had insufficient RNA to be analyzed by RT-qPCR.
c Bold IDs, blood samples used in TLDA and follow-up RT-qPCR analyses; IDs followed by *, serum samples used in RT-qPCR analyses. Serum samples were not available for all animals for which blood miRNAs were quantified by RT-qPCR, but the findings using all blood samples available or only the same sub-set of samples for which serum was also available were similar.
Fig 2Heatmap displaying significant canonical pathways identified in the treatment groups of whole blood.
The treatment groups AMPH normo, AMPH hyper, and EIH groups relative to control, and of AMPH hyper relative to AMPH normo and EIH were analyzed using the Fisher’s exact test at p<0.01. The color gradient reflects the predicted direction of change for each pathway, based on regulation z-score, where blue represents inhibited and orange represents activated.
Fig 3Scatterplot of fold-change expression for monocyte-specific mRNA transcripts in whole blood.
The log2 fold-changes for the AMPH normo, AMPH hyper, and EIH groups relative to control are shown. The horizontal gray bar indicates a 2-fold increase in expression compared to control. The subscripts * and ** indicate that the fold-change is significant and exceeds 1.5 and 2, respectively.
Fig 4Scatterplot of fold-change expression for T-cell-specific mRNA transcripts in the whole blood.
The log2 fold-change for the AMPH normo, AMPH hyper, and EIH groups relative to control are shown. The horizontal gray bars indicate a 2-fold increase and decrease in expression compared to control. The subscripts * and ** indicate that the fold-change is significant and exceeds 1.5 and 2, respectively.
Fig 5Scatterplot of fold-change expression for B-cell-specific mRNA transcripts in the whole blood.
The log2 fold-change for the AMPH normo, AMPH hyper, and EIH groups relative to control. The horizontal gray bars indicate a 2-fold increase and decrease in expression compared to control. The subscripts * and ** indicate that the fold-change is significant and exceeds 1.5 and 2, respectively.
Fold-change of selected miRNAs in the whole blood and serum of AMPH normo, AMPH hyper, and EIH groups relative to control.
| AMPH normo | AMPH hyper | EIH | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood | Serum | Blood | Serum | Blood | Serum | ||||||
| miRNA | TLDA | qPCR | qPCR | TLDA | qPCR | RNAseq | qPCR | TLDA | qPCR | qPCR | |
| 10.72 | 7.27 | 5.68 | 8.08 | 8.19 | 2.38 | 6.64 | 1.85 | 2.29 | 1.06 | ||
| 2.34 | 2.51 | 26.60 | 8.78 | 5.44 | -1.28 | 22.22 | 1.57 | 1.77 | 35.52 | ||
| 15.26 | 9.76 | 4.62 | 10.78 | 9.60 | 5.50 | 4.44 | 2.50 | 2.85 | 1.30 | ||
| 1.14 | -1.05 | 2.26 | -1.90 | -1.36 | -1.82 | 2.94 | -4.28 | -2.69 | 1.73 | ||
| 4.43 | 3.50 | 1.54 | 2.45 | 2.43 | 1.07 | 3.15 | 1.22 | 1.31 | 2.74 | ||
| 5.49 | 5.29 | 5.71 | 4.53 | 4.93 | 2.78 | 3.65 | 1.84 | 1.89 | 1.68 | ||
| 3.64 | 2.41 | 1.86 | 1.06 | 1.48 | -1.15 | -1.01 | -1.88 | -1.28 | -1.55 | ||
| 2.79 | 2.53 | 6.10 | 1.95 | 2.75 | 1.78 | 2.71 | 1.19 | 1.70 | 1.33 | ||
| 25.80 | 2.86 | ND | 30.92 | 15.6 | 2.80 | ND | 16.08 | 3.43 | ND | ||
a ND, not detected
Fold changes were assessed by TLDA screening (whole blood), RNAseq (control and AMPH hyper whole blood only), and RT-qPCR (whole blood and serum). Data are presented as mean fold-change relative to control.
*, p<0.05.