Literature DB >> 30778930

Testing the EKC hypothesis for ten US states: an application of heterogeneous panel estimation method.

Cem Işık1, Serdar Ongan2, Dilek Özdemir3.   

Abstract

This study aims to test the EKC (Environmental Kuznets Curve) hypothesis for the ten states, having the highest levels of carbon dioxide emissions in the USA, through the independent variables of real GDP, population, and renewable energy and fossil energy consumptions. To this aim, the panel estimation method with cross-sectional dependence is applied to data from 1980 to 2015. The empirical findings of the study indicate that the EKC (inverted U-shaped) hypothesis is valid only for Florida, Illinois, Michigan, New York, and Ohio. Interestingly, the negative impacts of fossil energy consumption on CO2 emission levels in Texas are not detected statistically although this state is the leading oil-producing state. Furthermore, the positive impacts of renewable energy consumption in Florida, officially known as "Sunshine State", are considerably low when compared with the other states.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CO2 emissions; Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC); Fossil energy; GDP; Population and cross-sectional dependence; Renewable energy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30778930     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-04514-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  11 in total

1.  Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve for Annex I countries using heterogeneous panel data analysis.

Authors:  Taeyoung Jin; Jinsoo Kim
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  The impact of smart city pilots on corporate total factor productivity.

Authors:  Pengyu Chen
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 5.190

3.  Optimal decisions for green supply chain with a risk-averse retailer under government intervention.

Authors:  Li Tang; Eldon Y Li; Peipei Wu; Jiang Jiang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 5.190

Review 4.  What does the EKC theory leave behind? A state-of-the-art review and assessment of export diversification-augmented models.

Authors:  Mehdi Ben Jebli; Mara Madaleno; Nicolas Schneider; Umer Shahzad
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.307

5.  Reducing coal overcapacity in China: a new perspective of optimizing local officials' promotion system.

Authors:  Qianqian Zhang; Xiaoli L Etienne; Ze Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 5.190

6.  The effect of mandatory environmental regulation on green development efficiency: evidence from China.

Authors:  Lei Zhan; Ping Guo; Guoqin Pan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 5.190

7.  Which factors influence the decisions of renewable energy investors? Empirical evidence from OECD and BRICS countries.

Authors:  Nurcan Kilinc-Ata; Ilya A Dolmatov
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 5.190

8.  Does income inequality reshape the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis? A nonlinear panel data analysis.

Authors:  Rongrong Li; Ting Yang; Qiang Wang
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 8.431

9.  Assessment of the total-factor energy efficiency and environmental performance of Persian Gulf countries: a two-stage analytical approach.

Authors:  Mohamad Nikbakht; Parviz Hajiani; Ahmad Ghorbanpur
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 5.190

10.  Do China's Urban-Environmental Quality and Economic Growth Conform to the Environmental Kuznets Curve?

Authors:  Wenhao Song; Chunhui Ye; Yuheng Liu; Weisong Cheng
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.