| Literature DB >> 30778104 |
Shu-Chun Huang1,2, Richard Casaburi3, Ming-Feng Liao4, Kuo-Cheng Liu1, Yu-Jen Chen1, Tieh-Cheng Fu5,2, Hong-Ren Su6.
Abstract
We hypothesized that blood lactate concentration([Lac]blood) is a function of cardiopulmonary variables, exercise intensity and some anthropometric elements during aerobic exercise. This investigation aimed to establish a mathematical model to estimate [Lac]blood noninvasively during constant work rate (CWR) exercise of various intensities. 31 healthy participants were recruited and each underwent 4 cardiopulmonary exercise tests: one incremental and three CWR tests (low: 35% of peak work rate for 15 min, moderate: 60% 10 min and high: 90% 4 min). At the end of each CWR test, venous blood was sampled to determine [Lac]blood. 31 trios of CWR tests were employed to construct the mathematical model, which utilized exponential regression combined with Taylor expansion. Good fitting was achieved when the conditions of low and moderate intensity were put in one model; high-intensity in another. Standard deviation of fitting error in the former condition is 0.52; in the latter is 1.82 mmol/liter. Weighting analysis demonstrated that, besides heart rate, respiratory variables are required in the estimation of [Lac]blood in the model of low/moderate intensity. In conclusion, by measuring noninvasive cardio-respiratory parameters, [Lac]blood during CWR exercise can be determined with good accuracy. This should have application in endurance training and future exercise industry.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30778104 PMCID: PMC6379358 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-38698-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Anthropometric data.
| age | (year) | 33 ± 9 |
|---|---|---|
| gender | (male: female) | 14:17 |
| body height | (centimeter) | 165 ± 9 |
| body weight | (kilogram) | 62.7 ± 11.6 |
| BMI | (kg/m2) | 22.8 ± 2.7 |
Mean ± standard deviation
Physiologic variables during graded and constant-work rate exercise test.
|
| ||
| Maximal VO2 | (ml/min/kg) | 30.1 ± 11.9 |
| Maximal work rate | (watt) | 187 ± 78 |
| VO2 at lactate threshold | (ml/min/kg) | 21.9 ± 6.7 |
| Work rate at lactate threshold | (watt) | 119 ± 53 |
| [Lac]blood at lactate threshold | mM/liter | 3.0 ± 1.0 |
|
| ||
| Work rate at LC | (watt) | 66 ± 29 |
| Work rate at MC | (watt) | 107 ± 46 |
| Work rate at HC | (watt) | 146 ± 66 |
| blood lactate concentration at LC | (mM/liter) | 3.7 ± 2.3 |
| blood lactate concentration at MC | (mM/liter) | 6.9 ± 4.2 |
| blood lactate concentration at HC | (mM/liter) | 10.4 ± 4.1 |
Mean ± standard deviation
CWR: constant work rate
LC: low-constant exercise test 35% maximal work rate 15′.
MC: moderate-constant exercise test 60% maximal work rate 10′.
HC: high-constant exercise test 90% maximal work rate 4′.
Figure 1Model estimates of blood lactate concentration compared with the measured value. (A–C) are low combined with moderate intensity CWR tests. (D–F) are those for high-intensity exercise. (G–I) is the model obtained when the data of three different intensities are combined. Scatter plot are demonstrated in (A,D,G). Agreement using Bland-Altman plot are shown in (B,C,E,F,H) and (B,E,H,I) show the difference between estimated and measured value. (C,F,I) are the percentage of estimation error. The dark solid horizontal lines in each Bland-Altman plot represent average bias whereas the dotted lines stand for average bias ± 1.96 standard deviation (95% upper and lower limit). The standard deviation in (B,E,H) are 0.52, 1.83 and 2.51 mmol/liter. The standard deviation in (C,F,I) are 0.1, 0.2 and 0.53.
Figure 2Absolute positive or negative weighting of each variable in determining blood level of lactate. BMI: body mass index; ExHR: exercising heart rate; BF: breathing frequency; VT: tidal volume