Literature DB >> 30777655

Between- and Within-Subjects Predictors of the Kilocalorie Content of Bites of Food.

James N Salley, Adam W Hoover, Eric R Muth.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study builds on previous research that seeks to estimate kilocalorie intake through microstructural analysis of eating behaviors. As opposed to previous methods, which used a static, individual-based measure of kilocalories per bite, the new method incorporates time- and food-varying predictors. A measure of kilocalories per bite (KPB) was estimated using between- and within-subjects variables.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between within-subjects and between-subjects predictors and KPB, and to develop a model of KPB that improves over previous models of KPB. Within-subjects predictors included time since last bite, food item enjoyment, premeal satiety, and time in meal. Between-subjects predictors included body mass index, mouth volume, and sex. PARTICIPANTS/
SETTING: Seventy-two participants (39 female) consumed two random meals out of five possible meal options with known weights and energy densities. There were 4,051 usable bites measured. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome measure of the first analysis was KPB. The outcome measure of the second analysis was meal-level kilocalorie intake, with true intake compared to three estimation methods. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Multilevel modeling was used to analyze the influence of the seven predictors of KPB. The accuracy of the model was compared to previous methods of estimating KPB using a repeated-measured analysis of variance.
RESULTS: All hypothesized relationships were significant, with slopes in the expected direction, except for body mass index and time in meal. In addition, the new model (with nonsignificant predictors removed) improved over earlier models of KPB.
CONCLUSIONS: This model offers a new direction for methods of inexpensive, accurate, and objective estimates of kilocalorie intake from bite-based measures.
Copyright © 2019 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bite count; Energy intake; Free-living; Microstructural analysis; Self-monitoring

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30777655      PMCID: PMC6592756          DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.12.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet        ISSN: 2212-2672            Impact factor:   4.910


  22 in total

Review 1.  Dietary energy density and weight regulation.

Authors:  M Yao; S B Roberts
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 7.110

2.  Gender, age, vessel size, cup vs. straw sipping, and sequence effects on sip volume.

Authors:  Harry T Lawless; Sharon Bender; Carol Oman; Cathy Pelletier
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  Eating behavior in humans, characterized by cumulative food intake curves--a review.

Authors:  M S Westerterp-Plantenga
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 4.  Development and testing of a labeled magnitude scale of perceived satiety.

Authors:  Armand V Cardello; Howard G Schutz; Larry L Lesher; Ellen Merrill
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2004-11-13       Impact factor: 3.868

5.  Effect of bite size and oral processing time of a semisolid food on satiation.

Authors:  Nicolien Zijlstra; René A de Wijk; Monica Mars; Annette Stafleu; Cees de Graaf
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Slowing bite-rate reduces energy intake: an application of the bite counter device.

Authors:  Jenna L Scisco; Eric R Muth; Yujie Dong; Adam W Hoover
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2011-08

7.  Self-report-based estimates of energy intake offer an inadequate basis for scientific conclusions.

Authors:  Dale A Schoeller; Diana Thomas; Edward Archer; Steven B Heymsfield; Steven N Blair; Michael I Goran; James O Hill; Richard L Atkinson; Barbara E Corkey; John Foreyt; Nikhil V Dhurandhar; John G Kral; Kevin D Hall; Barbara C Hansen; Berit Lilienthal Heitmann; Eric Ravussin; David B Allison
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 8.  Microstructural analyses of human ingestive patterns: from description to mechanistic hypotheses.

Authors:  J L Guss; H R Kissileff
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  A guide to analysing Universal Eating Monitor data: assessing the impact of different analysis techniques.

Authors:  Terence M Dovey; David Clark-Carter; Emma J Boyland; Jason C G Halford
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2008-08-28

10.  Laboratory eating behavior in obesity.

Authors:  Reinhold G Laessle; Sonja Lehrke; Sabine Dückers
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 3.868

View more
  1 in total

1.  Combining ecological momentary assessment, wrist-based eating detection, and dietary assessment to characterize dietary lapse: A multi-method study protocol.

Authors:  Stephanie P Goldstein; Adam Hoover; E Whitney Evans; J Graham Thomas
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2021-02-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.