Literature DB >> 30776336

The cellular basis of fibrotic tendon healing: challenges and opportunities.

Anne E C Nichols1, Katherine T Best1, Alayna E Loiselle2.   

Abstract

Tendon injuries are common and can dramatically impair patient mobility and productivity, resulting in a significant socioeconomic burden and reduced quality of life. Because the tendon healing process results in the formation of a fibrotic scar, injured tendons never regain the mechanical strength of the uninjured tendon, leading to frequent reinjury. Many tendons are also prone to the development of peritendinous adhesions and excess scar formation, which further reduce tendon function and lead to chronic complications. Despite this, there are currently no treatments that adequately improve the tendon healing process due in part to a lack of information regarding the contributions of various cell types to tendon healing and how their activity may be modulated for therapeutic value. In this review, we summarize recent efforts to identify and characterize the distinct cell populations involved at each stage of tendon healing. In addition, we examine the mechanisms through which different cell populations contribute to the fibrotic response to tendon injury, and how these responses can be affected by systemic factors and comorbidities. We then discuss gaps in our current understanding of tendon fibrosis and highlight how new technologies and research areas are shedding light on this clinically important and intractable challenge. A better understanding of the complex cellular environment during tendon healing is crucial to the development of new therapies to prevent fibrosis and promote tissue regeneration.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30776336      PMCID: PMC6545261          DOI: 10.1016/j.trsl.2019.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Res        ISSN: 1878-1810            Impact factor:   7.012


  152 in total

1.  Patterns of cellular activation after tendon injury.

Authors:  U Khan; J C Edwards; D A McGrouther
Journal:  J Hand Surg Br       Date:  1996-12

Review 2.  Monocyte and macrophage plasticity in tissue repair and regeneration.

Authors:  Amitava Das; Mithun Sinha; Soma Datta; Motaz Abas; Scott Chaffee; Chandan K Sen; Sashwati Roy
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  Expression of chondro-osteogenic BMPs in clinical samples of patellar tendinopathy.

Authors:  Yun Feng Rui; Pauline Po Yee Lui; Christer Gustav Rolf; Yin Mei Wong; Yuk Wa Lee; Kai Ming Chan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Aging does not alter tendon mechanical properties during homeostasis, but does impair flexor tendon healing.

Authors:  Jessica E Ackerman; Ibrahima Bah; Jennifer H Jonason; Mark R Buckley; Alayna E Loiselle
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Enhanced flexor tendon healing through controlled delivery of PDGF-BB.

Authors:  Stavros Thomopoulos; Rosalina Das; Matthew J Silva; Shelly Sakiyama-Elbert; Frederick L Harwood; Emmanouil Zampiakis; H Mike Kim; David Amiel; Richard H Gelberman
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  The detrimental effects of systemic Ibuprofen delivery on tendon healing are time-dependent.

Authors:  Brianne K Connizzo; Sarah M Yannascoli; Jennica J Tucker; Adam C Caro; Corinne N Riggin; Robert L Mauck; Louis J Soslowsky; David R Steinberg; Joseph Bernstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Changes in macrophage phenotype and induction of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition genes following acute Achilles tenotomy and repair.

Authors:  Kristoffer B Sugg; Jovan Lubardic; Jonathan P Gumucio; Christopher L Mendias
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Macrophage sub-populations and the lipoxin A4 receptor implicate active inflammation during equine tendon repair.

Authors:  Stephanie Georgina Dakin; Dirk Werling; Andrew Hibbert; Dilkush Robert Ephrem Abayasekara; Natalie Jayne Young; Roger Kenneth Whealands Smith; Jayesh Dudhia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  The role of animal models in tendon research.

Authors:  M W Hast; A Zuskov; L J Soslowsky
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.853

10.  Fetal and adult fibroblasts display intrinsic differences in tendon tissue engineering and regeneration.

Authors:  Qiao-Mei Tang; Jia Lin Chen; Wei Liang Shen; Zi Yin; Huan Huan Liu; Zhi Fang; Boon Chin Heng; Hong Wei Ouyang; Xiao Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  25 in total

1.  Tendon Cell Regeneration Is Mediated by Attachment Site-Resident Progenitors and BMP Signaling.

Authors:  Xubo Niu; Arul Subramanian; Tyler H Hwang; Thomas F Schilling; Jenna L Galloway
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 2.  The "other" 15-40%: The Role of Non-Collagenous Extracellular Matrix Proteins and Minor Collagens in Tendon.

Authors:  Nandaraj Taye; Stylianos Z Karoulias; Dirk Hubmacher
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells provide complete regeneration in a rabbit model of the Achilles tendon bundle rupture.

Authors:  Ruben K Chailakhyan; Elizaveta Kon; Anatoly B Shekhter; Sergey V Ivannikov; Vladimir I Telpukhov; Alla G Grosheva; Dmitry S Suslin; Nataliya N Vorobieva; Yury V Gerasimov; Semyon N Churbanov; Svetlana Kotova; Alexey L Fayzullin; Alexey V Lychagin; Marina M Lipina; Peter S Timashev
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-09-11       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Innate and adaptive immune system cells implicated in tendon healing and disease.

Authors:  G Crosio; A H Huang
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 4.325

5.  NF-κB activation persists into the remodeling phase of tendon healing and promotes myofibroblast survival.

Authors:  Katherine T Best; Anne E C Nichols; Emma Knapp; Warren C Hammert; Constantinos Ketonis; Jennifer H Jonason; Hani A Awad; Alayna E Loiselle
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 8.192

6.  Characterization of the structure, vascularity, and stem/progenitor cell populations in porcine Achilles tendon (PAT).

Authors:  Jianying Zhang; Feng Li; Kelly M Williamson; Susheng Tan; Devon Scott; Kentaro Onishi; MaCalus V Hogan; James H-C Wang
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 5.249

7.  Impact of isolation method on cellular activation and presence of specific tendon cell subpopulations during in vitro culture.

Authors:  Anne E C Nichols; Samantha N Muscat; Sarah E Miller; Luke J Green; Michael S Richards; Alayna E Loiselle
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 5.834

Review 8.  Tissue-specific parameters for the design of ECM-mimetic biomaterials.

Authors:  Olivia R Tonti; Hannah Larson; Sarah N Lipp; Callan M Luetkemeyer; Megan Makam; Diego Vargas; Sean M Wilcox; Sarah Calve
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2021-04-18       Impact factor: 10.633

9.  Adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cell-derived exosomes promote tendon healing by activating both SMAD1/5/9 and SMAD2/3.

Authors:  Hengchen Liu; Mingzhao Zhang; Manyu Shi; Tingting Zhang; Wenjun Lu; Shulong Yang; Qingbo Cui; Zhaozhu Li
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 6.832

Review 10.  The Roles of MicroRNAs in Tendon Healing and Regeneration.

Authors:  Lingli Ding; Min Wang; Shengnan Qin; Liangliang Xu
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-07-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.