Literature DB >> 30775854

Genetic basis and outcome in a nationwide study of Finnish patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Pertti Jääskeläinen1,2, Jagadish Vangipurapu3, Joose Raivo3, Teemu Kuulasmaa3, Tiina Heliö4, Katriina Aalto-Setälä5, Maija Kaartinen6, Erkki Ilveskoski7, Sari Vanninen7, Liisa Hämäläinen8, John Melin9, Jorma Kokkonen9, Markku S Nieminen4, Markku Laakso2, Johanna Kuusisto2.   

Abstract

AIMS: Nationwide large-scale genetic and outcome studies in cohorts with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) have not been previously published. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We sequenced 59 cardiomyopathy-associated genes in 382 unrelated Finnish patients with HCM and found 24 pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutations in six genes in 38.2% of patients. Most mutations were located in sarcomere genes (MYBPC3, MYH7, TPM1, and MYL2). Previously reported mutations by our study group (MYBPC3-Gln1061Ter, MYH7-Arg1053Gln, and TPM1-Asp175Asn) and a fourth major mutation MYH7-Val606Met accounted for 28.0% of cases. Mutations in GLA and PRKAG2 were found in three patients. Furthermore, we found 49 variants of unknown significance in 31 genes in 20.4% of cases. During a 6.7 ± 4.2 year follow-up, annual all-cause mortality in 482 index patients and their relatives with HCM was higher than that in the matched Finnish population (1.70 vs. 0.87%; P < 0.001). Sudden cardiac deaths were rare (n = 8). Systolic heart failure (hazard ratio 17.256, 95% confidence interval 3.266-91.170, P = 0.001) and maximal left ventricular wall thickness (hazard ratio 1.223, 95% confidence interval 1.098-1.363, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of HCM-related mortality and life-threatening cardiac events. The patients with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutation underwent an implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation more often than patients without a pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutation (12.9 vs. 3.5%, P < 0.001), but there was no difference in all-cause or HCM-related mortality between the two groups. Mortality due to HCM during 10 year follow-up among the 5.2 million population of Finland was studied from death certificates of the National Registry, showing 269 HCM-related deaths, of which 32% were sudden.
CONCLUSIONS: We identified pathogenic and likely pathogenic mutations in 38% of Finnish patients with HCM. Four major sarcomere mutations accounted for 28% of HCM cases, whereas HCM-related mutations in non-sarcomeric genes were rare. Mortality in patients with HCM exceeded that of the general population. Finally, among 5.2 million Finns, there were at least 27 HCM-related deaths annually.
© 2019 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetics; Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; Mortality; Mutation; Outcome; Targeted sequencing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30775854      PMCID: PMC6437444          DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.12420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ESC Heart Fail        ISSN: 2055-5822


Introduction

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), the most common monogenic heart disease with dominant mode of inheritance, is caused primarily by mutations in genes encoding sarcomere proteins. The two major genes responsible for HCM are cardiac myosin‐binding protein C (MYBPC3) and beta‐myosin heavy chain (MYH7) accounting for over a half of the HCM cases.1 The utilization of large‐scale sequencing methods has increased the spectrum of the putative HCM‐related genes into non‐sarcomeric genes, but two recent studies have suggested that mutations in non‐sarcomeric genes are rare cause of HCM.2, 3 The genetic background of HCM may be variable across different populations. To our knowledge, only one study investigating a large panel of cardiomyopathy‐related genes in a national HCM cohort has been published.4 The Finnish population has unique genetic background, originated from geographical, linguistic, and cultural isolation of the population.5 Consequently, in Finland, the distribution of rare genetic variants is different from that in other European populations, and a founder effect is frequently observed in the genetics of monogenic diseases.5 We have previously identified three Finnish founder mutations in sarcomere genes (MYBPC3Gln1061Ter, MYH7‐Arg1053Gln, and TPM1‐Asp175Asn), accounting for 24% of all cases with HCM in Finland.6, 7 However, there are no previous studies investigating large panels of cardiomyopathy‐related genes using next‐generation sequencing in Finnish patients with HCM. In early reports derived from referral centres in Europe and the USA, HCM‐related mortality was reported to be as high as 6% per year, but in a more recent report, the prognosis of HCM has been shown to be comparable with the general population.8 Risk stratification and the use of implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) in high‐risk patients has improved the prognosis of HCM.8 In a cross‐sectional setting, HCM in Finns is characterized by a relatively benign phenotype,9 but longitudinal observational studies on the natural history and the outcome of HCM have not been previously investigated in Finnish patients with HCM. In Finland, forensic pathologists of the National Mortality Registry review all deaths and the cause of death. Autopsy is performed in a high percentage of deaths and in all cases of sudden and unclear deaths. To our knowledge, there are no previous studies on nationwide HCM‐related deaths. The aim of our study was, therefore, firstly, to investigate the genetic basis of HCM in the nationwide cohort of Finnish patients by screening 59 cardiomyopathy‐associated genes with targeted sequencing. Secondly, we investigated HCM‐related mortality and adverse cardiovascular events in a prospective outcome study including Finnish index patients and relatives with HCM. Thirdly, the number of HCM‐related deaths among the 5.2 million population of Finland was examined from records and death certificates of the National Registry during the 10 year follow‐up.

Patients and methods

The diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

The diagnosis of HCM was based on left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) ≥15 mm in probands and ≥13 mm in relatives on two‐dimensional echocardiography or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the absence of other obvious causes for LVH.

Study cohorts and ethical approval

Our study includes three cohorts: (i) FinHCM Genetic Study (n = 382), which includes consecutive unrelated Finnish patients with HCM, as previously described,6, 10 (ii) FinHCM Outcome Study, which consists of 482 Finnish patients with HCM (339 probands and 143 relatives), and (iii) HCM Mortality Study (n = 573) based on the National Mortality Registry including all inhabitants of Finland, who deceased between 2001 and 2010, and whose cause of death was HCM. The study protocols were in agreement with the Declaration of Helsinki and were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Kuopio University Hospital. All patients gave written informed consent. The permission to use mortality data was accepted by the National Registry of Finland (Statistics Finland).

Genetic analyses of the FinHCM Genetic Study

FinHCM Genetic Study includes consecutive unrelated Finnish patients with HCM (n = 382), recruited from 12 Finnish hospitals (all five university hospitals and seven central hospitals), as previously described.6, 10 Participants of the study underwent a screening of 59 cardiomyopathy‐related genes using the Illumina MiSeq‐sequencer (Supporting Information, Table ). DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leucocytes for genetic analyses. The sequencing panel was designed to include all genes suggested to be associated with non‐syndromic cardiomyopathies at the time of the study onset. Sequencing methods applied in this study have been previously reported,11 and the details are presented in the Supporting Information. All pathogenic (P)/likely pathogenic (LP) variants were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. If an HCM‐related genetic variant was found in the index patient, it was screened in the relatives of the patients, when possible.

Classification of the filtered variants

Variants that underwent the filtering process as described in the Supporting Information were assigned as P, LP, variant of uncertain significance (VUS), likely benign, benign, or a variant with conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity (CON) according to the ClinVar archive (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar; accessed 21 November 2017). For variants assigned as P, LP, CON favouring pathogenicity (P and/or LP + VUS), or VUS, the allele frequency in Finns and non‐Finnish Europeans was obtained from the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD browser beta; http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; accessed 21 November 2017).

FinHCM Outcome Study

The FinHCM Outcome Study includes 482 Finnish patients (mean age 50.8 ± 15.0 years) with HCM (339 probands, of whom 333 were included also in the genetic study, and 143 relatives). At baseline, the participants of the FinHCM Outcome Study underwent a clinical and echocardiographic evaluation as previously described.6, 10 A 24 h Holter registration and bicycle ergometer test was performed in majority of the patients. In many cases, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed to verify the diagnosis of HCM. The baseline of the Finnish Outcome Study was defined by the time of initial recruitment (between October 1994 and April 2010). The follow‐up period was until 1 January 2011 in all patients or until the time of death if it occurred before the end of follow‐up. The mean follow‐up time was 6.7 ± 4.2 years (range 0.1–16.2 years). The follow‐up data were collected from hospital medical records by the physician recruiting the patient at baseline. Death records and certificates were obtained from the National Mortality Registry (Statistics Finland) and were available in all but one patient. Causes of death were reclassified as (i) HCM‐related sudden death, (ii) HCM‐related heart failure, (iii) HCM‐related atrial fibrillation and embolic stroke, and (iv) non‐HCM‐related death according to data from death certificates and medical records by two experienced cardiologists (P. J. and J. K.). If the death could not be classified as HCM‐related because of another possible cause (e.g. evidence of acute coronary syndrome related to sudden death) or the cause of death was multifactorial, the death was classified as HCM as a possible contributing factor. Autopsy was performed in 26 (47%) of the deaths.

HCM Mortality Study

HCM Mortality Study (n = 573) included all inhabitants of Finland who deceased between 2001 and 2010 and whose principal cause of death was HCM (ICD10 Diagnosis Number I42.1 or I42.2), or HCM was a contributing factor to death, according to death records from the National Mortality Registry. Autopsy was performed in 62% of deaths. In the present study, two experienced cardiologists (P. J. and J. K.) reviewed the death certificates and reclassified the cause of death as in the FinHCM Outcome Study (see aforementioned).

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed with the IBM SPSS Statistics 22.0 software (IBM, New York, NY, USA) and R statistical software, version 3.1.1. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables and n (%) for categorical variables. Demographic and clinical parameters listed in Supporting Information, Table were tested with the Cox regression analysis to investigate the factors predicting HCM‐related mortality or life‐threatening cardiac events (adequate ICD shock therapy, successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or cardiac transplantation). The variables that were statistically significant (P < 0.05) in the univariate analysis were further analyzed with a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model. Comparisons between two groups (P/LP vs. no P/LP mutation) were made by using the χ 2 or Mann–Whitney U test, when appropriate. We applied Kaplan–Meier method to investigate survival. The observed survival of the FinHCM outcome cohort was compared with the expected survival of the Finnish general population (n = 5.2 million) between 1995 and 2010 matched for age and sex. Observed and expected surviving fractions were compared by using one‐sample log‐rank test.

Results

FinHCM Genetic Study

Clinical characteristics

Patients included in the FinHCM Genetic Study (235 male and 147 female; mean age 53 ± 14 years) had mostly moderate LVH with normal left ventricular (LV) dimensions and ejection fraction (Supporting Information, Table ). LV outflow tract obstruction (pressure gradient >30 mmHg) was present in 23 patients (6%). The clinical phenotype of HCM in Finland, particularly in those with founder mutations MYBPC3‐Gln1061Ter12, 13, 14 and TPM1‐Asp175Asn,15, 16, 17, 18, 19 has previously been extensively reported.6, 9, 20

Genetic analyses

After filtering, a total of 230 different rare variants in 50 genes were found in 349 of 382 patients (Figure and Supporting Information, Tables and ). Altogether, 24 P/LP variants were found in four sarcomere (MYBPC3, MYH7, MYL2, and TPM1) and two non‐sarcomeric genes (GLA and PRKAG2) in 146 patients (38.2%; Figure and Table 1). A P/LP mutation was most often found in MYBPC3 (70/382, 18.3%) or MYH7 (48/382, 12.6%). The most frequent variants were MYBPC3Gln1061Ter (11.3%),21 MYH7‐Arg1053Gln (7.9%),22 and TPM1‐Asp175Asn (6.3%),10 which have previously been reported by our group, and MYH7Val606Met (2.6%). Altogether, these four sarcomere mutations accounted for 28% of the HCM cases and 73% of cases with a P/LP mutation. Mutations (P/LP) in non‐sarcomeric genes GLA and PRKAG2 were found in two and one subjects, respectively (Table 1). In the carriers of the two GLA mutations, a familial Fabry disease was found. None of the study participants had more than one P/LP variant. The allele counts of the P/LP mutations were zero or very low in both Finns and non‐Finnish Europeans according to the Genome Aggregation Database. A P/LP variant was found in 119 of 143 (83.2%) of clinically affected relatives that were included in the FinHCM Outcome Study.
Figure 1

Percentage distribution of genetic variants in 382 Finnish index patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. B, benign; CON, variant with conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity; LB, likely benign; LP, likely pathogenic; P, pathogenic; VUS, variant of uncertain significance.

Table 1

P/LP mutations associated with cardiomyopathy found in the FinHCM Genetic Study (n = 382)

GeneNucleotide changeAmino acid changeNo. of patients with variant, n (%)Class (ClinVar)Allele count in Finns (gnomAD)Allele count in European (non‐Finnish) (gnomAD)
GLA c.658C>Tp.Arg220Ter1PNANA
c.1228A>Gp.Thr410Ala1PNANA
MYBPC3 c.655‐2A>Ca 3NAb NANA
c.927‐2A>G1P0/34941/14 966
c.1227‐13G>Aa 3LPNANA
c.1358dupCp.Val454fs1P/LPNANA
c.1505_1509delGGTTCp.Arg502fs3LPNANA
c.1575T>Gp.Tyr525Ter2P/LPNANA
c.2373dupGp.Trp792Valfs4P0/17 2803/67 494
c.2556_2557delCGinsTCTa , c p.Gly853Leufs4PNANA
c.3181C>Ta p.Gln1061Ter43 (11.3)P3/16 5780/126 472
c.3190+5G>A5P/LP0/12 8742/111 318
c.3296_3297delGG; c.3295dupGp.Gly1099fs/p.Tyr1100fs1P/LP3/19 5540/94 384
MYH7 c.1178C>Tp.Ala393Val1LPNANA
c.1816G>Ap.Val606Met10 (2.6)P/LP0/34921/14 998
c.1987C>Tp.Arg663Cys1P/LPNANA
c.2155C>Ta p.Arg719Trp1P0/34921/14 998
c.2207T>Cp.Ile736Thr1PNANA
c.2539_2541delAAGp.Lys847Del2LPNANA
c.2770G>Ap.Glu924Lys2P/LPNANA
c.3158G>Aa p.Arg1053Gln30 (7.9)LP17/25 7940/126 704
MYL2 c.173G>Ap.Arg58Gln1P/LP2/22 2980/111 682
PRKAG2 c.905G>Ap.Arg302Gln1PNANA
TPM1 c.523G>Aa p.Asp175Asn24 (6.3)P4/25 7481/126 700
Total146 (38.2)

LP, likely pathogenic; NA, data not available; P, pathogenic.

Variant has been reported in our previous studies.

Variant was considered as a disease‐causing mutation in our previous21 and present study.

Variant was denoted A851InsT in our previous study.7

Percentage distribution of genetic variants in 382 Finnish index patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. B, benign; CON, variant with conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity; LB, likely benign; LP, likely pathogenic; P, pathogenic; VUS, variant of uncertain significance. P/LP mutations associated with cardiomyopathy found in the FinHCM Genetic Study (n = 382) LP, likely pathogenic; NA, data not available; P, pathogenic. Variant has been reported in our previous studies. Variant was considered as a disease‐causing mutation in our previous21 and present study. Variant was denoted A851InsT in our previous study.7 Altogether, 49 VUS or CON variants favouring pathogenicity were detected in 31 different genes in 78 patients (20.4%; Figure and Supporting Information, Tables and ). Of these patients, 58 (15.2%) did not have a P/LP mutation. Variants were detected in both sarcomeric (predominantly MYBPC3 and MYH7; 14 variants in 26 patients) and non‐sarcomeric genes (35 variants in 26 genes in 52 patients). Most of the variants (44/49) were missense variants in single patients. All VUS had zero to low allele counts in the Genome Aggregation Database. For 82 rare variants, the ClinVar classification was not available.

Baseline clinical characteristics

Baseline characteristics of most of the patients of the FinHCM Outcome Study have been reported previously.6, 7, 9, 10, 21 Baseline clinical characteristics of all study patients are shown in Supporting Information, Table . The mean maximal thickness of LV on echocardiography was 20 ± 5 mm, and LV dimensions and ejection fraction were within the normal limits in most patients (data not shown). Of the patients, 4 and 5% had a history of pacemaker or ICD implantation, respectively. Only one patient had a cardiac resynchronization therapy device implanted before baseline. None of the patients had undergone heart transplantation before baseline.

Deaths and cardiac events during the 6.7 year follow‐up

The incidence of cardiovascular events in the FinHCM Outcome Study are shown in Supporting Information, Table . The overall survival was 89% (all‐cause mortality 1.70% per year), and 55 patients (11%) died during the follow‐up (Figures and ). All‐cause mortality of the HCM outcome cohort was higher than that of age‐matched and sex‐matched general Finnish population of 5.2 million between 1995 and 2010 (Figure ).
Figure 2

Distribution of the causes of death in the FinHCM Outcome Study (54 deaths) and in the HCM Mortality Study (573 deaths). HCM, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Figure 3

Kaplan–Meier survival in the FinHCM Outcome Study (n = 482) compared with expected all‐cause mortality in the general Finnish population matched for age and sex. CI, confidence interval; SMR, standardized mortality ratio.

Distribution of the causes of death in the FinHCM Outcome Study (54 deaths) and in the HCM Mortality Study (573 deaths). HCM, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Kaplan–Meier survival in the FinHCM Outcome Study (n = 482) compared with expected all‐cause mortality in the general Finnish population matched for age and sex. CI, confidence interval; SMR, standardized mortality ratio. Of all deaths of the FinHCM Outcome Study, 38% were HCM‐related (eight sudden cardiac deaths (SCDs), nine heart failures, and four strokes; Figure and Supporting Information, Table ). The overall HCM‐related mortality was 4.4% (0.65% per year). Of those who suffered HCM‐related death, about half had a P/LP mutation. In 14 cases (25%), HCM was a contributing factor to death. The cause of death was not related to HCM in 35% of the patients. A life‐threatening cardiac event occurred in nine patients during the follow‐up (an adequate ICD shock therapy in four patients, a successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation in one patient, and cardiac transplantation in four patients; three of these patients died later during the follow‐up). Altogether, 27 subjects suffered an HCM‐related death or life‐threatening HCM event, giving the overall event rate 5.6% (0.85% per year) (Supporting Information, Table ). An ICD was implanted in 9% of study subjects. The indication for ICD was secondary prevention in 27% and primary prevention in 63% of implantations. Bradycardia pacemaker or cardiac resynchronization therapy was implanted in only few subjects. LV outflow tract obstruction was treated with either surgical myectomy or alcohol septal ablation in 4% of patients, respectively. Paroxysmal or chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) was present in 20% of patients. New‐onset heart failure was diagnosed in 11% of subjects. Coronary heart disease and cerebrovascular events were uncommon.

Predictors of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy‐related death and life‐threatening hypertrophic cardiomyopathy events

In univariate Cox analysis, advanced functional class (3–4), history of AF, history of ventricular fibrillation/cardiac arrest, pacemaker implantation, diastolic or systolic heart failure at baseline, maximal LV wall thickness, low LV ejection fraction, and the presence of AF at Holter registration were predictors of combined HCM‐related mortality and life‐threatening HCM events (Supporting Information, Table ). In multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis, only a history of systolic heart failure and maximal LV wall thickness remained statistically significant.

Differences between patients with or without a pathogenic/likely pathogenic mutation

Of the 482 patients with HCM, 255 (136 probands and 119 relatives; 52.9%) had a P/LP mutation shown in Table 1. The patients with a P/LP mutation were more often women (60.7 vs. 47.3%, P = 0.004), were younger (47.8 ± 14.6 vs. 54.1 ± 14.8 years, P < 0.001), had greater maximal LV wall thickness (20.2 ± 5.3 vs. 18.9 ± 4.0 mm, P = 0.011), and had smaller LV end‐diastolic (44.4 ± 6.7 vs. 47.4 ± 6.9 mm, P < 0.001) and end‐systolic (27.8 ± 6.5 vs. 29.8 ± 7.6 mm, P = 0.016) dimensions on echocardiography than those without a P/LP mutation. During the follow‐up, the patients with a P/LP mutation underwent an ICD implantation more often than patients without a P/LP mutation (12.9 vs. 3.5%, P < 0.001). All‐cause/HCM‐related mortality or combined HCM mortality and life‐threatening events did not differ between the two groups (data not shown). Between 2001 and 2010, 573 individuals (56% male, age at death 68.1 ± 16.6 years; 6% <40 years of age) in Finland suffered HCM‐related death. HCM was assigned as the principal cause of death by the National Mortality Registry in 393 of these patients (69%). Two cardiologists of the present study reclassified HCM as the principal cause of death in 269 of 573 cases (47% of all deaths, age at death 63.3 ± 16.5 years; Figure ), including 186 sudden cardiac (32%), 71 heart failure (12%), and 12 stroke deaths (2%), respectively. In 266 subjects, HCM (46%) was reclassified as a contributing factor to death.

Principal findings

Targeted sequencing of 59 genes associated with cardiomyopathies revealed P/LP mutations in 38% of HCM cases in the nationwide FinHCM Genetic Study and VUS or CON variants favouring pathogenicity in 20%. The four most frequent sarcomeric mutations accounted for 28% of the HCM cases, indicating that these few major mutations explain a substantial number of HCM cases in Finland. In contrast, P/LP variants in non‐sarcomeric genes were rare and found only in GLA and PRKAG2 genes in three patients. In the FinHCM Outcome Study, annual all‐cause mortality exceeded that of the age‐matched and gender‐matched general Finnish population. History of systolic heart failure and maximal LV wall thickness were independent predictors of HCM‐related mortality and life‐threatening cardiac events. The patients with a P/LP mutation underwent an ICD implantation more often than patients without a P/LP mutation, but all‐cause/HCM‐related mortality or combined HCM mortality and life‐threatening events did not differ between the two groups. Finally, among 5.2 million Finns, there were at least 27 HCM‐related deaths annually.

FinHCM Genetic Study

A P/LP mutation was identified in 38% of the cases, mainly in sarcomere genes. P/LP variants in non‐sarcomeric genes were rare. There are only few studies on targeted sequencing of comprehensive cardiomyopathy gene panels in large patient populations with HCM2, 4, 23, 24, 25 and only one in a national HCM cohort.4 Back in 2003, a French group reported a disease‐causing mutation in 63% (124/197) of unrelated HCM patients who underwent a screening of only nine core sarcomeric protein genes.26 In their study, the pathogenicity of variants was determined by traditional methods (e.g. co‐segregation with HCM and absence in controls). In a more recent report, in the screening of 41 genes, a potential HCM‐ related variant was found in 64% of 223 patients, but pathogenicity of variants was not validated against any currently available genetic databases.4 In another recent study, in 31 genes tested, P/LP variants were found in 39.9% of cases almost exclusively in sarcomeric genes.2 Expanded gene panels do not appear to substantially increase sensitivity of HCM testing beyond gene panels including eight core sarcomere genes, GLA, PRKAG2, and LAMP2.23 Generally, because of the variability in patient cohorts, genetic methodology, and interpretation of results, the comparison of the results of published studies with targeted sequencing is challenging. The present study highlights the fundamental role of four sarcomeric mutations in the pathogenesis of HCM in the Finnish population. We have previously reported three major Finnish HCM‐causing mutations, MYBPC3Gln1061Ter, MYH7‐Arg1053Gln, and TPM1‐Asp175Asn, which are rare in other populations.6, 7 Now, we report another major mutation, MYH7Val606Met, in 2.6% of patients. These four mutations explained almost one‐third of the HCM cases and more than two‐thirds of the cases with a P or LP mutation. Likewise, in a nationwide HCM study in Iceland, a single MYBPC3 mutation c.927‐2A>G accounted for 58% of all HCM cases.27 The occurrence of distinct major mutations for HCM in genetically isolated populations emphasizes the need for national genetic studies in HCM.27, 28 In our study, 15% of the patients had a VUS or CON variant favouring pathogenicity without another likely causal variant for HCM. Moreover, for a considerable number of rare variants, ClinVar classification was not available. Some of these variants might be actual disease‐causing mutations, and further studies are needed to determine their causality. Finally, a considerable number of patients did not have a P/LP, VUS, or CON variant in any of the genes tested. Further studies are needed to investigate if these patients have mutations in unknown genes for HCM, in regulatory non‐coding regions of already identified causal genes, or LVH‐inducing variants in multiple genes.

FinHCM Outcome Study

In the FinHCM Outcome Study, the annual all‐cause mortality (1.70%) was higher than that expected (0.87%) in the matched general Finnish population, and annual HCM‐related mortality was 0.65%. There are only a few previous mortality studies including mainly US patient populations with HCM.29, 30 All‐cause mortality in the present study is in agreement with a study of US HCM patients29 but contrasts a retrospective study of 706 HCM patients, where the overall survival was not different from that of matched White US population.30 The annual HCM‐related mortality in the present study is comparable with HCM‐related mortality reported in other adult HCM cohorts.29, 30 A rather favourable outcome in our study is likely to be explained by the inclusion of relatives, who usually have milder disease than probands. Furthermore, if the 14 deaths classified as contributors to death were classified as HCM deaths, HCM‐related mortality would have been higher. Sudden cardiac death and heart failure were the major mechanisms of HCM‐related death in the present study, followed by embolic stroke. In a previous study, the mechanisms of HCM deaths were most often SCD and heart failure.29 A history of systolic heart failure and maximal LV wall thickness, both well‐known risk factors for HCM‐related death,8 were independent predictors of combined HCM‐related death and life‐threatening events. Many of the other risk factors for SCD did not predict HCM‐related mortality and life‐threatening HCM events in the present study, possibly because of small number of deaths. The presence of a P/LP mutation was associated with female gender, younger age, thicker LV wall, and smaller LV dimensions. The phenotypic expression of the two major mutations MYBPC3Gln1061Ter and TPM1‐D175N has been investigated in detail in our previous study.6 Although there was no difference in HCM‐related mortality or combined HCM‐related mortality and life‐threatening events, patients with a P/LP mutation were more likely to undergo an ICD implantation. In a recent study, it was reported that young age at diagnosis and the presence of a sarcomere mutation are associated with an adverse clinical outcome.31

HCM Mortality Study

The HCM Mortality Study shows that in Finland, with a population of 5.2 million, at least 27 deaths annually are attributed to HCM. To our knowledge, there are no previous nationwide studies on HCM‐related deaths. About 70% of the reclassified HCM‐related deaths in Finland were sudden. Undoubtedly, post‐mortem diagnosis of HCM at autopsy may be challenging. However, our findings suggest that a considerable number of subjects suffer an HCM‐related death in Finland and that the proportion of SCDs compared with other causes of death is higher at the population level than that in patient populations participating in clinical studies. As the HCM Mortality Study cohort was based on patients with an HCM‐related death according to death certificates, the actual HCM‐related mortality at the population level might be even higher. For example, the low frequency of embolic stroke in the HCM Mortality Study cohort might be explained by that not all fatal embolic strokes suffered by HCM patients were classified as HCM‐related in death certificates.

Clinical implications

Screening of a panel of 59 cardiomyopathy genes identifies a causative mutation in about 40% of Finnish patients with HCM. Screening of the four major mutations identifies genetic cause for HCM in about 30% and should be a primary genetic testing in Finland, even if large‐scale genetic panels are used. All‐cause mortality exceeded the expected all‐cause mortality in the general Finnish population, but the rate of HCM‐related deaths and life‐threatening HCM events was relatively low. However, patients with marked cardiac hypertrophy or heart failure should be monitored carefully to reduce HCM‐related mortality. Finally, a considerable number of HCM‐related deaths, particularly SCDs, in the Finnish population suggest that there are undiagnosed and untreated patients with HCM who would benefit of more effective diagnostic and treatment options.

Strengths and limitations of the study

First, a comprehensive panel of 59 genes associated with cardiomyopathy was used in the screening of the large nationwide FinHCM genetic cohort, but not all putative genes associated with HCM were investigated. Thus, some disease‐causing mutations may have been missed. However, as the frequency of P/LP mutations in other than the eight core sarcomeric genes is very low in the present study and few recently published reports,2, 3 major mutations were probably not missed. Second, pathogenicity of the genetic variants was determined according to the present ClinVar archive classification. The ClinVar classification, however, was not available for all rare variants, and some of the variants classified as variants with unknown significance may be disease causing. Third, for variants assigned as P, LP, or VUS, the allele frequencies in Finns and non‐Finnish Europeans were obtained from the Genome Aggregation Database. Only few previous studies have included population‐based allele frequencies to investigate rare protein‐altering variants for HCM.2, 4 Fourth, for the present study, medical records and mortality data from the National Mortality Registry were available for almost all subjects and deaths, and autopsy was performed in a considerable number of deaths, increasing reliability of our findings.

Conclusions

By using targeted genetic testing of a large cardiomyopathy panel, a causative mutation was found in approximately 40% of Finnish patients with HCM. In Finnish patients, the genetic profile of HCM is unique, as four major mutations in the sarcomeric genes account for one‐third of all cases and three‐quarters of cases with P or LP mutation. HCM‐related mortality in patients with diagnosed HCM was low, but all‐cause mortality was higher than that expected in the general population. Finally, according to the National Registry, at least five HCM‐related deaths per million inhabitants occur annually in Finland.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Funding

This work was supported by the Academy of Finland, the Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research, and the Kuopio University Hospital (EVO grants to J.K.). Data S1. Supporting information. Click here for additional data file. Table S1. List of the 59 genes included in the FinHCM Genetic Study screening. Click here for additional data file. Table S2. Clinical characteristics of the FinHCM Genetic Study (n=382). Click here for additional data file. Table S3. A list of all 382 patients with HCM included in the FinHCM Genetic Study, and the rare variants (GMAF > 1 %) detected in each patient. Click here for additional data file. Table S4. Variants with conflicting evidence favouring pathogenicity, or with uncertain significance found in the FinHCM Genetic Study (n=382). Click here for additional data file. Table S5. Baseline characteristics of the patients of the FinHCM Outcome Study (n=482). Click here for additional data file. Table S6. New events in the FinHCM Outcome Study (n=482). Click here for additional data file. Table S7. HCM‐related deaths and their circumstances in the FinHCM Outcome Study. Click here for additional data file. Table S8. Univariate and multivariate predictors (Cox regression) of combined HCM‐related mortality and life‐threatening HCM events in the FinHCM Outcome Study. Click here for additional data file.
  32 in total

Review 1.  How Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Became a Contemporary Treatable Genetic Disease With Low Mortality: Shaped by 50 Years of Clinical Research and Practice.

Authors:  Barry J Maron; Ethan J Rowin; Susan A Casey; Martin S Maron
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 14.676

2.  Left ventricular mechanical dispersion is associated with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Mikko Jalanko; Mika Tarkiainen; Petri Sipola; Pertti Jääskeläinen; Kirsi Lauerma; Mika Laine; Markku S Nieminen; Markku Laakso; Tiina Heliö; Johanna Kuusisto
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 4.709

3.  Cine MR imaging of myocardial contractile impairment in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy attributable to Asp175Asn mutation in the alpha-tropomyosin gene.

Authors:  Petri Sipola; Kirsi Lauerma; Pertti Jääskeläinen; Markku Laakso; Keijo Peuhkurinen; Hannu Manninen; Hannu J Aronen; Johanna Kuusisto
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-07-12       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: distribution of disease genes, spectrum of mutations, and implications for a molecular diagnosis strategy.

Authors:  Pascale Richard; Philippe Charron; Lucie Carrier; Céline Ledeuil; Theary Cheav; Claire Pichereau; Abdelaziz Benaiche; Richard Isnard; Olivier Dubourg; Marc Burban; Jean-Pierre Gueffet; Alain Millaire; Michel Desnos; Ketty Schwartz; Bernard Hainque; Michel Komajda
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-04-21       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  Genetics of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in eastern Finland: few founder mutations with benign or intermediary phenotypes.

Authors:  Pertti Jääskeläinen; Raija Miettinen; Päivi Kärkkäinen; Lauri Toivonen; Markku Laakso; Johanna Kuusisto
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.709

6.  A new common mutation in the cardiac beta-myosin heavy chain gene in Finnish patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Pertti Jääskeläinen; Tiina Heliö; Katriina Aalto-Setälä; Maija Kaartinen; Erkki Ilveskoski; Liisa Hämäläinen; John Melin; Satu Kärkkäinen; Keijo Peuhkurinen; Markku S Nieminen; Markku Laakso; Johanna Kuusisto
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 4.709

7.  Reassessment of Mendelian gene pathogenicity using 7,855 cardiomyopathy cases and 60,706 reference samples.

Authors:  Roddy Walsh; Kate L Thomson; James S Ware; Birgit H Funke; Jessica Woodley; Karen J McGuire; Francesco Mazzarotto; Edward Blair; Anneke Seller; Jenny C Taylor; Eric V Minikel; Daniel G MacArthur; Martin Farrall; Stuart A Cook; Hugh Watkins
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Additional value of screening for minor genes and copy number variants in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Irene Mademont-Soler; Jesus Mates; Raquel Yotti; Maria Angeles Espinosa; Alexandra Pérez-Serra; Ana Isabel Fernandez-Avila; Monica Coll; Irene Méndez; Anna Iglesias; Bernat Del Olmo; Helena Riuró; Sofía Cuenca; Catarina Allegue; Oscar Campuzano; Ferran Picó; Carles Ferrer-Costa; Patricia Álvarez; Sergio Castillo; Pablo Garcia-Pavia; Esther Gonzalez-Lopez; Laura Padron-Barthe; Aranzazu Díaz de Bustamante; María Teresa Darnaude; José Ignacio González-Hevia; Josep Brugada; Francisco Fernandez-Aviles; Ramon Brugada
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Distribution and medical impact of loss-of-function variants in the Finnish founder population.

Authors:  Elaine T Lim; Peter Würtz; Aki S Havulinna; Priit Palta; Taru Tukiainen; Karola Rehnström; Tõnu Esko; Reedik Mägi; Michael Inouye; Tuuli Lappalainen; Yingleong Chan; Rany M Salem; Monkol Lek; Jason Flannick; Xueling Sim; Alisa Manning; Claes Ladenvall; Suzannah Bumpstead; Eija Hämäläinen; Kristiina Aalto; Mikael Maksimow; Marko Salmi; Stefan Blankenberg; Diego Ardissino; Svati Shah; Benjamin Horne; Ruth McPherson; Gerald K Hovingh; Muredach P Reilly; Hugh Watkins; Anuj Goel; Martin Farrall; Domenico Girelli; Alex P Reiner; Nathan O Stitziel; Sekar Kathiresan; Stacey Gabriel; Jeffrey C Barrett; Terho Lehtimäki; Markku Laakso; Leif Groop; Jaakko Kaprio; Markus Perola; Mark I McCarthy; Michael Boehnke; David M Altshuler; Cecilia M Lindgren; Joel N Hirschhorn; Andres Metspalu; Nelson B Freimer; Tanja Zeller; Sirpa Jalkanen; Seppo Koskinen; Olli Raitakari; Richard Durbin; Daniel G MacArthur; Veikko Salomaa; Samuli Ripatti; Mark J Daly; Aarno Palotie
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Defining the genetic architecture of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: re-evaluating the role of non-sarcomeric genes.

Authors:  Roddy Walsh; Rachel Buchan; Alicja Wilk; Shibu John; Leanne E Felkin; Kate L Thomson; Tang Hak Chiaw; Calvin Chin Woon Loong; Chee Jian Pua; Claire Raphael; Sanjay Prasad; Paul J Barton; Birgit Funke; Hugh Watkins; James S Ware; Stuart A Cook
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 35.855

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Controversial molecular functions of CBS versus non-CBS domain variants of PRKAG2 in arrhythmia and cardiomyopathy: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Xue Gong; Peiyu Yu; Ting Wu; Yunru He; Kaiyu Zhou; Yimin Hua; Sha Lin; Tao Wang; He Huang; Yifei Li
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 2.473

2.  The Genetic Architecture of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in Hungary: Analysis of 242 Patients with a Panel of 98 Genes.

Authors:  Róbert Sepp; Lidia Hategan; Beáta Csányi; János Borbás; Annamária Tringer; Eszter Dalma Pálinkás; Viktória Nagy; Hedvig Takács; Dóra Latinovics; Noémi Nyolczas; Attila Pálinkás; Réka Faludi; Miklós Rábai; Gábor Tamás Szabó; Dániel Czuriga; László Balogh; Róbert Halmosi; Attila Borbély; Tamás Habon; Zoltán Hegedűs; István Nagy
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-03

3.  Metabolite Signature in the Carriers of Pathogenic Genetic Variants for Cardiomyopathy: A Population-Based METSIM Study.

Authors:  Rowmika Ravi; Lilian Fernandes Silva; Jagadish Vangipurapu; Maleeha Maria; Joose Raivo; Seppo Helisalmi; Markku Laakso
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2022-05-13

4.  CMR derived left ventricular septal convexity in carriers of the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy-causing MYBPC3-Q1061X mutation.

Authors:  Mika Tarkiainen; Petri Sipola; Mikko Jalanko; Tiina Heliö; Pertti Jääskeläinen; Kati Kivelä; Mika Laine; Kirsi Lauerma; Johanna Kuusisto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Genetic basis and outcome in a nationwide study of Finnish patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Pertti Jääskeläinen; Jagadish Vangipurapu; Joose Raivo; Teemu Kuulasmaa; Tiina Heliö; Katriina Aalto-Setälä; Maija Kaartinen; Erkki Ilveskoski; Sari Vanninen; Liisa Hämäläinen; John Melin; Jorma Kokkonen; Markku S Nieminen; Markku Laakso; Johanna Kuusisto
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2019-02-18

6.  Angiotensinogen M235T polymorphism and susceptibility to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in Asian population: A meta analysis.

Authors:  Zhen Zhen; Lu Gao; Qin Wang; Xi Chen; Jia Na; Xiwei Xu; Yue Yuan
Journal:  J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst       Date:  2020 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.636

7.  Yield of Rare Variants Detected by Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing in a Cohort of Romanian Index Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Miruna Mihaela Micheu; Nicoleta-Monica Popa-Fotea; Nicoleta Oprescu; Stefan Bogdan; Monica Dan; Alexandru Deaconu; Lucian Dorobantu; Oana Gheorghe-Fronea; Maria Greavu; Corneliu Iorgulescu; Alexandru Scafa-Udriste; Razvan Ticulescu; Radu Gabriel Vatasescu; Maria Dorobanțu
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-07

8.  Cardiomyopathy associated with the Ala143Thr variant of the α-galactosidase A gene.

Authors:  Kati Valtola; Juanita Nino-Quintero; Marja Hedman; Line Lottonen-Raikaslehto; Tomi Laitinen; Maleeha Maria; Ilkka Kantola; Anita Naukkarinen; Markku Laakso; Johanna Kuusisto
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Whole-exome sequencing reveals MYH7 p.R671C mutation in three different phenotypes of familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Wei Yu; Mi-Mi Huang; Guo-Hong Zhang; Wei Wang; Chun-Juan Chen; Ji-Dong Cheng
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 2.447

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.