| Literature DB >> 30775347 |
Masoud Foroutan1,2, Fatemeh Ghaffarifar2, Zohreh Sharifi3, Abdolhosein Dalimi2, Ogholniaz Jorjani4.
Abstract
Toxoplasmosis is a cosmopolitan zoonotic infection, caused by a unicellular protozoan parasite known as Toxoplasma gondii that belongs to the phylum Apicomplexa. It is estimated that over one-third of the world's population has been exposed and are latently infected with the parasite. In humans, toxoplasmosis is predominantly asymptomatic in immunocompetent persons, while among immunocompromised individuals may be cause severe and progressive complications with poor prognosis. Moreover, seronegative pregnant mothers are other risk groups for acquiring the infection. The life cycle of T. gondii is very complex, indicating the presence of a plurality of antigenic epitopes. Despite of great advances, recognize and construct novel vaccines for prevent and control of toxoplasmosis in both humans and animals is still remains a great challenge for researchers to select potential protein sequences as the ideal antigens. Notably, in several past years, constant efforts of researchers have made considerable advances to elucidate the different aspects of the cell and molecular biology of T. gondii mainly on microneme antigens, dense granule antigens, surface antigens, and rhoptry proteins (ROP). These attempts thereby provided great impetus to the present focus on vaccine development, according to the defined subcellular components of the parasite. Although, currently there is no commercial vaccine for use in humans. Among the main identified T. gondii antigens, ROPs appear as a putative vaccine candidate that are vital for invasion procedure as well as survival within host cells. Overall, it is estimated that they occupy about 1%-30% of the total parasite cell volume. In this review, we have summarized the recent progress of ROP-based vaccine development through various strategies from DNA vaccines, epitope or multi epitope-based vaccines, recombinant protein vaccines to vaccines based on live-attenuated vectors and prime-boost strategies in different mouse models.Entities:
Keywords: Adjuvant; Immunization; Mice; Toxoplasma gondii; Vaccines
Year: 2019 PMID: 30775347 PMCID: PMC6369123 DOI: 10.7774/cevr.2019.8.1.4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Exp Vaccine Res ISSN: 2287-3651
The main features and functions of some ROPs
| Antigens | Features or major effects on host | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| ROP1 | Expressed in tachyzoite, bradyzoite, and sporozoite stages | [ |
| Has a key role in cell invasion | ||
| Enhance the invasion process of parasite | ||
| Related to the | ||
| ROP2 | A member of the ROP2-protein family | [ |
| Expressed in sporozoites, tachyzoites, and bradyzoites stages | ||
| Containing T-cell and B-cell epitopes | ||
| Participates in the formation of PV and PVM | ||
| Molecular link between cell mitochondria and PVM | ||
| Pivotal for invasion and replication of parasites | ||
| Critical for parasite-host cell interaction | ||
| As the target of mucosal immune mechanisms | ||
| As a vaccine or diagnostic candidate Ag | ||
| Contributed in the uptake of iron from the infected host (serve as ligands for human hololactoferrin) | ||
| ROP4 | A member of the ROP2-protein family | [ |
| Expressed in sporozoites, tachyzoites, and bradyzoites stages | ||
| Contains a predicted serine/threonine PK domain in the C terminus | ||
| Participates in the formation of PV | ||
| Interaction with the mitochondrial import machinery | ||
| Release from the parasite during or shortly after invasion | ||
| Secreted ROP4 is linked to the PVM | ||
| Involvement in vacuole membrane function | ||
| Contributed in the uptake of iron from the infected host (serve as ligands for human hololactoferrin) | ||
| ROP5 | A secretory protein of the ROP2 family | [ |
| Responsible for the major virulence of parasite | ||
| Contribute to the intracellular proliferation of parasite | ||
| Major virulence determinant of immune evasion by inhibiting the accumulation of IRGs on PVM | ||
| Contains a tandem cluster of polymorphic alleles that differ in expression levels among different virulent strains, however, is confirmed to be responsible for the virulence of all types I strains | ||
| As a key component with a key role during the invasion process into the host cell | ||
| Dedicate to the formation of a PV and then becomes associated with the PVM | ||
| Act as essential cofactors for ROP18 | ||
| A potential stimulators for both of humoral and cellular immune responses | ||
| ROP7 | A member of the ROP2 family | [ |
| After synthesis and maturation, it is localized in the rhoptries at the apical end of the permeabilized tachyzoites and colocalizes with ROP1 | ||
| Translocated into the PV upon invasion | ||
| ROP8 | Has a conserved serine/threonine kinase domain | [ |
| One of the most abundant proteins belonging to the ROP2 family | ||
| An important protein in the pathogenesis of parasite | ||
| Containing T-cell and B-cell epitopes | ||
| ROP9 | A soluble rhoptry protein | [ |
| Only expressed in tachyzoite stage | ||
| Might be involved in the early stages of invasion | ||
| Contains putative B-cell epitopes | ||
| Induces an exclusive CD4+ T cell response | ||
| ROP13 | A soluble protein that is proteolytically processed en route to the rhoptries and can be injected into the host cell cytoplasm | [ |
| ROP13 shows no homology to any known protein and lacks any identifiable domains. | ||
| ROP16 | Contains a NLS, which injected during the invasion process into the host cell cytoplasm and then translocated rapidly into the nucleus | [ |
| A key virulence factor of | ||
| As a ROPK | ||
| Key virulence determinant and regulator of host-cell transcription | ||
| Activate both STAT3 and STAT6 signaling pathways | ||
| IL-12 downregulation (ROP16 knockout parasites induce higher value of IL-12) | ||
| Arginase 1 induction | ||
| Containing T-cell epitopes | ||
| ROP17 | Containing a key ATP-binding domain and conserved residues in its catalytic triad region | [ |
| Verified as a ROPKs | ||
| ROP18 | A member of the ROP2-protein family | [ |
| A key virulence factor in | ||
| A highly polymorphic serine-threonine kinase (as a ROPK) | ||
| ROP18 protein is secreted into the host cell cytoplasm during the infection and localizes to PVM | ||
| Inhibiting accumulation of the IRGs on the PVM | ||
| Contribution in controlling the intracellular proliferation of | ||
| Downregulate CD8+ T cell-mediated type I adaptive immune responses | ||
| Inactivation of host innate and adaptive immune responses | ||
| ROP19 | Has a key role in the PVM | [ |
| As an active kinase located in the PV | ||
| Containing T-cell and B-cell epitopes | ||
| ROP38 | It is predicted to be an active ROPK | [ |
| Has an inhibitory effect on host cell transcription by suppression of MAPK signaling | ||
| Involved in the regulation of host transcription factor expression and cell proliferation | ||
| Due to the low sequence variation in ROP38 gene among different | ||
| ROP54 | A rhoptry pseudokinase effector involved in | [ |
| Modulate the innate immunity of the host cell |
ROP, rhoptry protein or rhoptry antigens; T. gondii, Toxoplasma gondii; PV, parasitophorous vacuole; PVM, parasitophorous vacuole membrane; Ag, antigen; PK, protein kinase; IRGs, immunity-related GTPases; NLS, nuclear localization sequence; ROPK, rhoptry protein kinase; IL, interleukin; MAPK, mitogen activated protein kinase.
Examples of adjuvants in vaccination experiments against Toxoplasma gondii infection in mouse models
| Category | Adjuvant | Function | Summary of results | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genetic adjuvants | pIFN-γ | Cytokine | Co-delivery of pIFN-γ with pcROP1 elicited the cellular immune responses with high production of IFN-γ and IL-2 cytokines [ | [ |
| One of the important Th1 cytokines | ||||
| Play a main role in protective immunity against toxoplasmosis | ||||
| pIL-12 | Cytokine | Co-administration of pIL-12 with pGRA7-ROP1 enhanced the levels of IgG titers, elicited Th1-biased responses with predominance of the IgG2a over IgG1, evoked higher secretion of IL-10, IFN-γ and TNF-α, prolonged survival time (50% survival rate 4 weeks post challenge) and decreased the percentage of brain cysts loads [ | [ | |
| Expressing the p35 and p40 subunits of murine IL-12 | Co-administration of pIL-12 with pcSAG1+pcROP2 increased the survival time, compared with the controls (p<0.05). Enhancement of IgG antibodies and IFN-γ production also was observed [ | |||
| Enhancement of Th1 cellular immune responses | The group co-administered pIL-12 plus pSAG1-ROP2 or pSAG1-ROP2-GRA2 elicited stronger humoral and Th1-type cellular immune responses as well as higher survival times [ | |||
| Promotes NK cell activity | Multiantigenic DNA vaccine (pSAG1-ROP2-SAG2) with pIL-12 co-delivery is a very effective approach in the protection against | |||
| Enhances CTLs response | DNA immunization of CBA/J mice with pROP18 induced specific humoral and cellular immune responses and co-administration of pIL12 did not enhance these responses [ | |||
| Stimulates the secretion of IFN-γ | ||||
| Lead to decrease the plasmid dose required for immune response stimulation and improve the immunogenicity of the vaccines | ||||
| Essential for the development of innate and adaptive immunity to limit toxoplasmosis | ||||
| pIL-18 | Cytokine | Coimmunization of pVAX-ROP13 with pVAX-IL-18 dramatically enhanced the survival duration, reduced the brain cysts load and provoked the IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-4, and IL-10 production, compared with pVAX-ROP13 alone [ | [ | |
| Activates NK cells | ||||
| Enhances Th1-type immunity | ||||
| Induces IFN-γ | ||||
| Synergizes with IL-12 | ||||
| pB7-2 | Co-stimulatory molecule | The co-inoculation of pB7-2 with pROP16-GRA7 or single-gene vaccines considerably augmented humoral and cellular immune responses as well as the survival duration of time [ | [ | |
| Play a key role in providing co-stimulatory signals required for the generation and maintenance of antigen-specific immune response | ||||
| Has a key role to stimulate the T-cell differentiation toward Th1 pathway | ||||
| Play a central role in the antigen-specific induction of CD8+ CTL response | ||||
| CpG-ODN | As the TLR-9 ligand | Coimmunization of CpG-ODN with rROP2 and rROP2+rGRA4 dramatically reduced the percentage of brain cysts (63% and 66%, respectively) [ | [ | |
| Increase antigen-specific immunity | ||||
| Boost the immunogenicity of DNA vaccines | ||||
| Strong enhancers of Th1-biased immune | ||||
| Activate the DCs | ||||
| pCTXA2/B | A powerful mucosal adjuvant | In the group co-administered pCTXA2/B with pSAG1-ROP2, there was no obvious enhancement of immunity in terms of humoral and Th1-type cellular immune responses as well as survival time [ | [ | |
| Composed of five non-toxic B subunits and one A subunit. Subunit A contains A1 and A2, of which A1 is the major toxin and is not essential for its adjuvant effect. | The use of pCTXA2/B with a multi-epitope DNA vaccine lead to boost both humoral and cellular immune responses in BALB/c mice [ | |||
| Induce mucosal immune response | ||||
| Conventional adjuvants | Alum | Leads to increased vaccine uptake | The mice immunized by pcROP1 with or without alum produced higher Th1 immune response compared with control groups. It should be noted, the levels of IFN-γ in mice immunized with PBS, pcROP1, and pcROP1+alum were 46.61±1.79, 1,161.00±76.10, and 433.00±51 pg/mL, respectively. Also, higher levels of IgG2a was observed in pcROP1+alum group. All mice in both groups that received pcROP1 and pcROP1+alum were died within seven days and no significant difference was seen between experimental and control groups (the controls were died within 6 days) [ | [ |
| Enhanced stability at the site of injection | Co-administration of alum with pcSAG1+pcROP2 increased the survival time, compared with the controls (p<0.05). However, no significant difference was seen between groups that received adjuvants or no adjuvant. Enhancement of IgG antibodies and IFN-γ production also was observed [ | |||
| Promotes antigen phagocytosis by APCs | rGRA4-rROP2-alum immunized mice from both strains of C57BL/6 (H-2b) and C3H (H-2k) with ME49 cysts resulted in fewer brain cysts than the controls (p<0.01), whereas vaccination with rROP2-alum, only conferred protection to C3H mice (p<0.01) [ | |||
| Activates MQs | ||||
| Increases MHC II expression and antigen presentation | ||||
| PLG/PLGA | Microparticle/nanoparticle | rROP18+PLGA administered intranasally enhanced the specific IgA and IgG2a levels in comparison to the group that immunized subcutaneously with rROP18-montanide adjuvant (p<0.05) [ | [ | |
| As a safe delivery system and a potent adjuvant | rROP18 and/or rROP38 encapsulated into PLG, induced a long-term humoral and cellular immune response with dramatic reduction in the brain cyst formation (81.3% reduction in PLG+rROP38+rROP18 vaccinated mice) [ | |||
| Extended antigen release | rROP18 and/or rCDPK6 encapsulated into PLG microparticles, induced a long-term humoral and cellular immune response with dramatic reduction in the brain cyst formation (ranged from 47.7% to 73.6%) [ | |||
| Reduce protein degradation | ||||
| Generate a long-lasting immune response | ||||
| Facilitate Ag uptake via APCs | ||||
| Quil-A | Classified as saponins | rROP2-Quil-A adjuvant enhanced humoral and cellular responses in the immunized BALB/c mice [ | [ | |
| Obtained from the bark of a tree | ||||
| Used as veterinary adjuvant | ||||
| Has the following advantages: low cost, easily formulated and generally safe | ||||
| Re | Ginseng, the root of | Co-administration of rROP18 with Re induced humoral and cellular immune responses [ | [ | |
| Ginseng saponins, i.e., ginsenosides, are believed to be one of the active fractions in the root | ||||
| Ginsenosides have adjuvant properties and the adjuvant activity | ||||
| Elicited the antibody response against viral and bacterial antigens | ||||
| Safe and relatively low cost | ||||
| Liposomes | As vesicles composed of phospholipids and cholesterol | Immunization with a liposome-encapsulated DNA encoding ROP1-SAG1, increased both humoral and cellular immune responses [ | [ | |
| Proper for Ag or plasmid delivery | ||||
| Protect DNA from degradation by serum proteins | ||||
| Enhanced cellular and humoral immunity | ||||
| Montanide | - | Significantly higher levels of IgG (with the predominance of IgG1 over IgG2a) were observed in mice vaccinated with rROP18-Montanide adjuvant, compared with rROP18 group (p<0.05) [ | [ |
IFN-γ, interferon-γ; Th, T helper; ROP, rhoptry protein or rhoptry antigens; IL, interleukin; GRA, dense granule antigens; NK cells, natural killer cells; CTLs, cytotoxic T lymphocytes; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α; CpG ODN, oligodeoxynucleotides contained CG motifs; TLR, Toll-like receptor; DCs, dendritic cells; CTXA2/B, A2/B subunits of cholera toxin; APCs, antigen-presenting cells; MQs, macrophages; MHC, major histocompatibility complex; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PLGA, polylactide-co-glycolide acid; Ag, antigen; PLG, polylactide-co-glycolide; Re, Ginsenoside Re; SAG, surface antigens.