| Literature DB >> 28337191 |
Ze-Dong Wang1, Huan-Huan Liu2, Zhan-Xi Ma3, Hong-Yu Ma2, Zhong-Yu Li2, Zhi-Bin Yang4, Xing-Quan Zhu5, Bin Xu6, Feng Wei7, Quan Liu8.
Abstract
Toxoplasma gondii has been suggested as an important opportunistic pathogen in immunocompromised patients. We conducted a global meta-analysis to assess the prevalence and odds ratios (ORs) of T. gondii infection in immunocompromised individuals. Electronic databases were reviewed for T. gondii infection in HIV/AIDS patients, cancer patients, and transplant recipients, and meta-analyses were conducted to calculate overall estimated prevalence and ORs using random or fixed-effects models. Totally, 72 eligible studies were included. The estimated pooled prevalence of T. gondii infection in immunocompromised patients and the control was 35.9 and 24.7% (p < 0.001), with an OR of 2.24, i.e., 42.1 and 32.0% for HIV/AIDS patients and the control (p < 0.05), 26.0 and 12.1% for cancer patients and the control (p < 0.001), and 42.1 and 34.5% for transplant recipients and the control (p > 0.05), whose estimated pooled ORs were 1.92 (95% CI, 1.44-2.55), 2.89 (95% CI, 2.36-3.55), and 1.51 (95% CI, 1.16-1.95), respectively. This study is the first to demonstrate that the immunocompromised patients are associated with higher odds of T. gondii infection, and appropriate prevention and control measures are highly recommended for these susceptible populations.Entities:
Keywords: HIV/AIDS patients; Toxoplasma gondii; cancer patients; immunocompromised patients; odds ratio; prevalence; transplant recipients
Year: 2017 PMID: 28337191 PMCID: PMC5343064 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00389
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Quality criteria for the included studies.
| Diagnostic approach | – | Approach clearly described | nd |
| – | Repeatedly examined by a test or two different tests | nd | |
| – | Re-examined by a senior laboratory technician | nd | |
| Study design | Cohort study | Case control study or cross sectional study | – |
| No. of case subjects | ≥100 | 50–100 | ≤50 |
| Source of population | Community-based or from two or more countries | ≥2 hospitals | 1 hospital |
| Matching of case and control subjects | Age and sex | Age or sex | nd |
nd, no data available.
Figure 1Data search and selection.
Characteristics of the included studies forT. gondii infection (IgG) in HIV/AIDS patients.
| Quinn et al., | C-C | DR Congo | NA | IFA | 3 |
| Quinn et al., | C-C | USA | Homosexual men | IFA | 4 |
| Zumla et al., | C-C | Uganda | NA | DT, LAT | 6 |
| Zumla et al., | C-C | Zambia | NA | DT, LAT | 6 |
| Meisheri et al., | C-C | India | NA | ELISA | 2 |
| Wongkamchai et al., | C-C | Thailand | NA | ELISA | 1 |
| Gongora-Biachi et al., | C-C | Mexico | NA | MEIA | 4 |
| Chaves-Borges et al., | C-S | India | NA | ELISA | 4 |
| Sukthana et al., | C-C | Thailand | NA | NA | 3 |
| Praharaj et al., | C-C | India | NA | ELISA | 7 |
| Wanachiwanawin et al., | C-C | Thailand | Pregnant women | ELISA | 4 |
| Maiga et al., | C-C | Mali | NA | ELISA | 5 |
| Zhou and Huang, | C-C | China | NA | MEIA | 3 |
| Falusi et al., | C-S | USA | NA | DT | 5 |
| Nissapatorn et al., | C-S | Malaysia | NA | ELISA | 4 |
| Uneke et al., | C-C | Nigeria | NA | ELISA | 4 |
| Simpore et al., | C-S | Burkina Faso | Pregnant women | ELISA | 3 |
| Jin et al., | C-S | China | Drug user | ELISA | 3 |
| Shimelis et al., | C-C | Ethiopia | NA | ELISA | 5 |
| Ouermi et al., | C-C | Burkina Faso | Pregnant women | ELISA | 5 |
| Hua et al., | C-C | China | NA | ELISA | 3 |
| Lago et al., | C-S | Brazil | Pregnant women | ELFA | 4 |
| Akanmu et al., | C-C | Nigeria | NA | ELISA | 4 |
| Li et al., | C-S | China | Drug users | ELISA | 3 |
| Sitoe et al., | C-C | Mozambique | Pregnant women | ELISA | 4 |
| Tian et al., | C-C | China | NA | ELISA | 6 |
| Dakovic-Rode et al., | C-C | Croatia | NA | ELISA | 4 |
| Daryani et al., | C-S | Iran | NA | ELISA | 4 |
| Fernandes et al., | C-C | Brazil | Pregnant women | ELFA | 3 |
| Song, | C-S | China | NA | ELISA | 5 |
| John et al., | C-C | Papua New Guinea | NA | ELISA | 7 |
| Alavi et al., | C-C | Iran | Drug user | ELISA | 2 |
| Gamba et al., | C-C | Central Africa | Pregnant women | ELISA | 5 |
| You, | C-C | China | NA | ELISA | 7 |
| Ogoina et al., | C-S | Nigeria | NA | ELISA | 3 |
| Walle et al., | C-S | Ethiopia | NA | ELISA | 5 |
| Endris et al., | C-S | Ethiopia | NA | ELISA | 2 |
| Pang et al., | C-S | China | NA | ELISA | 3 |
| Uppal et al., | C-S | India | NA | ELISA | 4 |
| Shen et al., | C-C | China | NA | ELISA | 3 |
HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; AIDS, acquired immune deficiency syndrome; C-C, case control study; C-S, cross-sectional study; NA, not applicable because the reference does not provide this parameter; IFA, indirect fluorescent antibody test; MEIA, microparticle enzyme immunoassay; DT, dye test; LAT, latex agglutination test; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosbsorbent assay.
Figure 2Geographical distribution of the included studies. The map was created using MapInfo Professional software version 9.5. Pooled odds ratio and 95% confidence interval are shown for each country.
Figure 3Meta-analysis of the association of HIV/AIDS patients and . CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
Figure 5Meta-analysis of the association of transplant recipients and . CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
Characteristics of the included studies for cancer patients.
| Wei et al., | C-C | China | Mixed | NP | IHA, ELISA | 4 |
| Zhao et al., | C-C | China | Mixed | NP | ELISA | 2 |
| Ryan et al., | C-C | Australia | Glioma | NP | ELISA | 4 |
| Ryan et al., | C-C | Australia | Meningioma | NP | ELISA | 4 |
| Peng et al., | C-C | China | Mixed | NP | IHA | 4 |
| Wu et al., | C-C | China | Mixed | NP | IHA | 5 |
| Lai et al., | C-C | China | Mixed | NP | ELISA | 5 |
| Liu and Li, | C-C | China | Mixed | NP | IHA | 3 |
| Zhang et al., | C-S | China | Mixed | NP | IHA | 5 |
| Wang et al., | C-C | China | Mixed | NP | ELISA | 6 |
| Huang et al., | C-C | China | Cervical cancer | Other diseases | ELISA | 3 |
| Wu et al., | C-C | China | Mixed | NP | IHA, ELISA | 5 |
| Wei and Zhu, | C-C | China | Mixed | NP | ELISA | 3 |
| Yang et al., | C-C | China | Mixed | NP | ELISA | 4 |
| Zhang et al., | C-C | China | Mixed | NP | ELISA | 3 |
| Yazar et al., | C-C | Turkey | Mixed | NP | ELISA | 7 |
| Huang et al., | C-C | China | Mixed | NP | IHA | 5 |
| Ma et al., | C-C | China | Mixed | NP | ELISA | 3 |
| Zheng et al., | C-C | China | Lung cancer | NP | ELISA | 5 |
| Yuan et al., | C-C | China | Mixed | NP | ELISA | 4 |
| Ghasemian et al., | C-S | Iran | Mixed | NP | ELISA | 7 |
| Sun et al., | C-C | China | Mixed | NP | ELISA | 4 |
| Li et al., | C-C | China | Mixed | NP | ICT | 4 |
| Zhang et al., | C-C | China | Mixed | NP | ELISA | 3 |
| Lian et al., | C-C | China | Mixed | NP | ELISA | 4 |
| Cong et al., | C-C | China | Mixed | NP | ELISA | 8 |
| Tian et al., | C-C | China | Leukemia and Lymphoma | NP | ELISA | 3 |
| Manouchehri Naeini et al., | C-C | Iran | Mixed | NP | ELISA | 7 |
| Kalantari et al., | C-S | Iran | Breast cancer | Healthy women | ELISA | 6 |
C-C, case-control study; C-S, cross-sectional study; IHA, indirect hemagglutination; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosbsorbent assay; ICT, immunochromatographic test; NP, normal population.
Characteristics of the included studies for transplant recipients.
| Sluiters et al., | C | Netherland | Donor | Heart | ELISA | 5 |
| Gan et al., | C-C | China | Self-control | Kidney | IHA | 4 |
| Arora et al., | C | Norway | Donor | Heart | ELISA | 5 |
| Caner et al., | C | Turkey | Donor | Liver | DT | 5 |
| Gharavi et al., | C | Iran | Self-control | Kidney | ELFA, ELISA | 9 |
| Gharavi et al., | C | Iran | Self-control | Kidney | ELISA | 9 |
| Soltani et al., | C-S | Iran | Healthy subjects | Kidney | ELISA | 4 |
C, cohort study; C-C, case-control study; C-S, cross-sectional study; IHA, indirect hemagglutination; DT, dye test; LAT, latex agglutination test; ELFA, enzyme-linked flourescence assay; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.