INTRODUCTION: Simulation is increasingly used throughout medicine. Within ultrasound, simulators are more established for learning transvaginal and interventional procedures. The use of modern high-fidelity transabdominal simulators is increasing, particularly in centres with large trainee numbers. There is no current literature on the value of these simulators in gaining competence in abdominal ultrasound. The aim was to investigate the impact of a new ultrasound curriculum, incorporating transabdominal simulators into the first year of training in a UK radiology academy. METHODS: The simulator group included 13 trainees. The preceding cohort of 15 trainees was the control group. After 10 months, a clinical assessment was performed to assess whether the new curriculum resulted in improved ultrasound skills. Questionnaires were designed to explore the acceptability of simulation training and whether it had any impact on confidence levels. RESULTS: Trainees who had received simulator-enriched training scored higher in an objective clinical ultrasound assessment, which was statistically significant (p = 0.0463). End confidence scores for obtaining diagnostic images and demonstrating pathology were also higher in the simulation group. All trainees stated that transabdominal simulator training was useful in early training. CONCLUSIONS: This initial study shows that embedded into a curriculum, transabdominal ultrasound simulators are an acceptable training method that can result in improved ultrasound skills and higher confidence levels. Using simulators early in training could allow trainees to master the basics, improve their confidence, enabling them to get more educational value from clinical ultrasound experience while reducing the impact of training on service provision.
INTRODUCTION: Simulation is increasingly used throughout medicine. Within ultrasound, simulators are more established for learning transvaginal and interventional procedures. The use of modern high-fidelity transabdominal simulators is increasing, particularly in centres with large trainee numbers. There is no current literature on the value of these simulators in gaining competence in abdominal ultrasound. The aim was to investigate the impact of a new ultrasound curriculum, incorporating transabdominal simulators into the first year of training in a UK radiology academy. METHODS: The simulator group included 13 trainees. The preceding cohort of 15 trainees was the control group. After 10 months, a clinical assessment was performed to assess whether the new curriculum resulted in improved ultrasound skills. Questionnaires were designed to explore the acceptability of simulation training and whether it had any impact on confidence levels. RESULTS: Trainees who had received simulator-enriched training scored higher in an objective clinical ultrasound assessment, which was statistically significant (p = 0.0463). End confidence scores for obtaining diagnostic images and demonstrating pathology were also higher in the simulation group. All trainees stated that transabdominal simulator training was useful in early training. CONCLUSIONS: This initial study shows that embedded into a curriculum, transabdominal ultrasound simulators are an acceptable training method that can result in improved ultrasound skills and higher confidence levels. Using simulators early in training could allow trainees to master the basics, improve their confidence, enabling them to get more educational value from clinical ultrasound experience while reducing the impact of training on service provision.
Authors: Harbir S Sidhu; Babajide O Olubaniyi; Gauraang Bhatnagar; Vivien Shuen; Paul Dubbins Journal: J Ultrasound Med Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Eugene Y Kissin; Peter C Grayson; Amy C Cannella; Paul J Demarco; Amy Evangelisto; Janak Goyal; Rany Al Haj; Jay Higgs; Daniel G Malone; Midori J Nishio; Darren Tabechian; Gurjit S Kaeley Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: David Ryan Stather; Paul MacEachern; Alex Chee; Elaine Dumoulin; Christopher A Hergott; Alain Tremblay Journal: Can Respir J Date: 2012 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.409
Authors: Christy Burden; Jessica Preshaw; Paul White; Timothy J Draycott; Simon Grant; Robert Fox Journal: Simul Healthc Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 1.929
Authors: Martin G Tolsgaard; Tobias Todsen; Jette L Sorensen; Charlotte Ringsted; Torben Lorentzen; Bent Ottesen; Ann Tabor Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-02-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mia Louise Østergaard; Kristina Rue Nielsen; Elisabeth Albrecht-Beste; Annette Kjær Ersbøll; Lars Konge; Michael Bachmann Nielsen Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-01-07 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Stephen Thompson; Thomas Dowrick; Goufang Xiao; João Ramalhinho; Maria Robu; Mian Ahmad; Dan Taylor; Matthew J Clarkson Journal: J Open Res Softw Date: 2020-03-30