| Literature DB >> 30771254 |
Vojtěch Brlík1,2, Jaroslav Koleček1, Malcolm Burgess3, Steffen Hahn4, Diana Humple5, Miloš Krist6, Janne Ouwehand7, Emily L Weiser8,9, Peter Adamík6,10, José A Alves11,12, Debora Arlt13, Sanja Barišić14, Detlef Becker15, Eduardo J Belda16, Václav Beran6,17,18, Christiaan Both7, Susana P Bravo19, Martins Briedis4, Bohumír Chutný20, Davor Ćiković14, Nathan W Cooper21, Joana S Costa11, Víctor R Cueto19, Tamara Emmenegger4, Kevin Fraser22, Olivier Gilg23,24, Marina Guerrero25, Michael T Hallworth26, Chris Hewson27, Frédéric Jiguet28, James A Johnson29, Tosha Kelly30, Dmitry Kishkinev31,32, Michel Leconte33, Terje Lislevand34, Simeon Lisovski4, Cosme López35, Kent P McFarland36, Peter P Marra26, Steven M Matsuoka29,37, Piotr Matyjasiak38, Christoph M Meier4, Benjamin Metzger39, Juan S Monrós40, Roland Neumann41, Amy Newman42, Ryan Norris42, Tomas Pärt13, Václav Pavel6,43, Noah Perlut44, Markus Piha45, Jeroen Reneerkens7, Christopher C Rimmer36, Amélie Roberto-Charron22, Chiara Scandolara4, Natalia Sokolova46,47, Makiko Takenaka48, Dirk Tolkmitt49, Herman van Oosten50,51, Arndt H J Wellbrock52, Hazel Wheeler53, Jan van der Winden54, Klaudia Witte52, Bradley K Woodworth55, Petr Procházka1.
Abstract
Currently, the deployment of tracking devices is one of the most frequently used approaches to study movement ecology of birds. Recent miniaturization of light-level geolocators enabled studying small bird species whose migratory patterns were widely unknown. However, geolocators may reduce vital rates in tagged birds and may bias obtained movement data. There is a need for a thorough assessment of the potential tag effects on small birds, as previous meta-analyses did not evaluate unpublished data and impact of multiple life-history traits, focused mainly on large species and the number of published studies tagging small birds has increased substantially. We quantitatively reviewed 549 records extracted from 74 published and 48 unpublished studies on over 7,800 tagged and 17,800 control individuals to examine the effects of geolocator tagging on small bird species (body mass <100 g). We calculated the effect of tagging on apparent survival, condition, phenology and breeding performance and identified the most important predictors of the magnitude of effect sizes. Even though the effects were not statistically significant in phylogenetically controlled models, we found a weak negative impact of geolocators on apparent survival. The negative effect on apparent survival was stronger with increasing relative load of the device and with geolocators attached using elastic harnesses. Moreover, tagging effects were stronger in smaller species. In conclusion, we found a weak effect on apparent survival of tagged birds and managed to pinpoint key aspects and drivers of tagging effects. We provide recommendations for establishing matched control group for proper effect size assessment in future studies and outline various aspects of tagging that need further investigation. Finally, our results encourage further use of geolocators on small bird species but the ethical aspects and scientific benefits should always be considered.Keywords: condition; migration; phenology; reproduction; return rate; survival; tag effect; tracking device
Year: 2019 PMID: 30771254 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12962
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anim Ecol ISSN: 0021-8790 Impact factor: 5.091