Literature DB >> 35864230

Quantifying research waste in ecology.

Marija Purgar1,2, Tin Klanjscek1, Antica Culina3,4.   

Abstract

Research inefficiencies can generate huge waste: evidence from biomedical research has shown that most research is avoidably wasted and steps have been taken to tackle this costly problem. Although other scientific fields could also benefit from identifying and quantifying waste and acting to reduce it, no other estimates of research waste are available. Given that ecological issues interweave most of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, we argue that tackling research waste in ecology should be prioritized. Our study leads the way. We estimate components of waste in ecological research based on a literature review and a meta-analysis. Shockingly, our results suggest only 11-18% of conducted ecological research reaches its full informative value. All actors within the research system-including academic institutions, policymakers, funders and publishers-have a duty towards science, the environment, study organisms and the public, to urgently act and reduce this considerable yet preventable loss. We discuss potential ways forward and call for two major actions: (1) further research into waste in ecology (and beyond); (2) focused development and implementation of solutions to reduce unused potential of ecological research.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35864230     DOI: 10.1038/s41559-022-01820-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol        ISSN: 2397-334X            Impact factor:   19.100


  52 in total

1.  Relationships fade with time: a meta-analysis of temporal trends in publication in ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Michael D Jennions; Anders P Møller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Publication bias in ecology and evolution: an empirical assessment using the 'trim and fill' method.

Authors:  Michael D Jennions; Anders P Møller
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2002-05

3.  Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research.

Authors:  C Glenn Begley; Lee M Ellis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  A survey of publication bias within evolutionary ecology.

Authors:  Phillip Cassey; John G Ewen; Tim M Blackburn; Anders P Møller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015.

Authors:  Colin F Camerer; Anna Dreber; Felix Holzmeister; Teck-Hua Ho; Jürgen Huber; Magnus Johannesson; Michael Kirchler; Gideon Nave; Brian A Nosek; Thomas Pfeiffer; Adam Altmejd; Nick Buttrick; Taizan Chan; Yiling Chen; Eskil Forsell; Anup Gampa; Emma Heikensten; Lily Hummer; Taisuke Imai; Siri Isaksson; Dylan Manfredi; Julia Rose; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Hang Wu
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2018-08-27

6.  A new ecosystem for evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Shinichi Nakagawa; Adam G Dunn; Malgorzata Lagisz; Alexandra Bannach-Brown; Eliza M Grames; Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar; Rose E O'Dea; Daniel W A Noble; Martin J Westgate; Pieter A Arnold; Stuart Barrow; Alison Bethel; Eve Cooper; Yong Zhi Foo; Sonya R Geange; Emily Hennessy; Witness Mapanga; Kerrie Mengersen; Claudia Munera; Matthew J Page; Vivian Welch; Neal R Haddaway
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 15.460

7.  Meta-research: Evaluation and Improvement of Research Methods and Practices.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis; Daniele Fanelli; Debbie Drake Dunne; Steven N Goodman
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Low availability of code in ecology: A call for urgent action.

Authors:  Antica Culina; Ilona van den Berg; Simon Evans; Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Introducing our series: research synthesis and meta-research in biology.

Authors:  Shinichi Nakagawa; Julia Koricheva; Malcolm Macleod; Wolfgang Viechtbauer
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 7.431

10.  Questionable research practices in ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Hannah Fraser; Tim Parker; Shinichi Nakagawa; Ashley Barnett; Fiona Fidler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.