Ioannis Sokolakis1, Fotios Dimitriadis2, Pearline Teo3, Georgios Hatzichristodoulou4, Dimitrios Hatzichristou2, Francois Giuliano5. 1. Department of Urology and Paediatric Urology, Julius Maximilian University Medical Centre of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany; Centre for Sexual and Reproductive Health, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece. Electronic address: sokolakisi@gmail.com. 2. Centre for Sexual and Reproductive Health, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece; 1(st) Department of Urology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece. 3. Department of Global Clinical Research, Dornier MedTech Asia Pte Ltd, Singapore. 4. Department of Urology and Paediatric Urology, Julius Maximilian University Medical Centre of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. 5. Poincare Hospital AP-HP, Garches, UMR1179 Inserm-UVSQ-Paris Saclay University, Paris, France.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Despite recent promising clinical results, the underlying mechanism of action of low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (Li-ESWT) for erectile dysfunction (ED) is mostly unclear and currently under investigation. AIM: To systematically identify and evaluate evidence regarding the basic science behind Li-ESWT for ED, discuss and propose a putative mechanism of action, address the limitations, and imply insights for further investigation in the field. METHODS: Using Cochrane's methodologic recommendations on scoping studies and systematic reviews, we conducted a systematic scoping review of the literature on experimental research regarding Li-ESWT for ED and other pathologic conditions. The initial systematic search was carried between January and November 2017, with 2 additional searches in April and August 2018. All studies that applied shockwave treatment at an energy flux density >0.25 mJ/mm2 were excluded from the final analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: We primarily aimed to clarify the biological responses in erectile tissue after Li-ESWT that could lead to improvement in erectile function. RESULTS: 59 publications were selected for inclusion in this study. 15 experimental research articles were identified on Li-ESWT for ED and 44 on Li-ESWT for other pathologic conditions. Li-ESWT for ED seems to improve erectile function possibly through stimulation of mechanosensors, inducing the activation of neoangiogenesis processes, recruitment and activation of progenitor cells, improving microcirculation, nerve regeneration, remodeling of erectile tissue, and reducing inflammatory and cellular stress responses. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Improving our understanding of the mechanism of action of Li-ESWT for ED can help us improve our study designs, as well as suggest new avenues of investigation. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: A common limitation in all these studies is the heterogeneity of the shockwave treatment application and protocol. CONCLUSION: Li-ESWT for ED, based on current experimental studies, seems to improve erectile function by inducing angiogenesis and reversing pathologic processes in erectile tissue. These studies provide preliminary insights, but no definitive answers, and many questions remain unanswered regarding the mechanism of action, as well as the ideal treatment protocol. Sokolakis I, Dimitriadis F, Teo P, et al. The Basic Science Behind Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Scoping Review of Pre-Clinical Studies. J Sex Med 2019;16:168-194.
INTRODUCTION: Despite recent promising clinical results, the underlying mechanism of action of low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (Li-ESWT) for erectile dysfunction (ED) is mostly unclear and currently under investigation. AIM: To systematically identify and evaluate evidence regarding the basic science behind Li-ESWT for ED, discuss and propose a putative mechanism of action, address the limitations, and imply insights for further investigation in the field. METHODS: Using Cochrane's methodologic recommendations on scoping studies and systematic reviews, we conducted a systematic scoping review of the literature on experimental research regarding Li-ESWT for ED and other pathologic conditions. The initial systematic search was carried between January and November 2017, with 2 additional searches in April and August 2018. All studies that applied shockwave treatment at an energy flux density >0.25 mJ/mm2 were excluded from the final analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: We primarily aimed to clarify the biological responses in erectile tissue after Li-ESWT that could lead to improvement in erectile function. RESULTS: 59 publications were selected for inclusion in this study. 15 experimental research articles were identified on Li-ESWT for ED and 44 on Li-ESWT for other pathologic conditions. Li-ESWT for ED seems to improve erectile function possibly through stimulation of mechanosensors, inducing the activation of neoangiogenesis processes, recruitment and activation of progenitor cells, improving microcirculation, nerve regeneration, remodeling of erectile tissue, and reducing inflammatory and cellular stress responses. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Improving our understanding of the mechanism of action of Li-ESWT for ED can help us improve our study designs, as well as suggest new avenues of investigation. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: A common limitation in all these studies is the heterogeneity of the shockwave treatment application and protocol. CONCLUSION:Li-ESWT for ED, based on current experimental studies, seems to improve erectile function by inducing angiogenesis and reversing pathologic processes in erectile tissue. These studies provide preliminary insights, but no definitive answers, and many questions remain unanswered regarding the mechanism of action, as well as the ideal treatment protocol. Sokolakis I, Dimitriadis F, Teo P, et al. The Basic Science Behind Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Scoping Review of Pre-Clinical Studies. J Sex Med 2019;16:168-194.
Authors: Celeste Manfredi; Fabio Castiglione; Mikkel Fode; Michal Lew-Starowicz; Javier Romero-Otero; Carlo Bettocchi; Giovanni Corona Journal: Int J Impot Res Date: 2022-07-27 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Danyon Anderson; John Laforge; Maggie M Ross; Robert Vanlangendonck; Jamal Hasoon; Omar Viswanath; Alan D Kaye; Ivan Urits Journal: Health Psychol Res Date: 2022-08-20
Authors: Jae-Wook Chung; Tae Gyun Kwon; Se Won Jang; Eun Hye Lee; So Young Chun; Yun-Sok Ha; Seock Hwan Choi; Jun Nyung Lee; Bum Soo Kim; Hyun Tae Kim; See Hyung Kim; Tae-Hwan Kim; Eun Sang Yoo Journal: Int J Impot Res Date: 2022-03-28 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: James L Liu; Kevin Y Chu; Andrew T Gabrielson; Run Wang; Landon Trost; Gregory Broderick; Kelvin Davies; Gerald Brock; John Mulhall; Ranjith Ramasamy; Trinity J Bivalacqua Journal: Sex Med Date: 2021-05-14 Impact factor: 2.491
Authors: Eric Chung; Joe Lee; Chia Chu Liu; Hisanori Taniguchi; Hui Liang Zhou; Hyun Jun Park Journal: World J Mens Health Date: 2020-06-02 Impact factor: 5.400