Literature DB >> 30768362

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Physics, Artifacts, and Quality Control Considerations.

Nikki Tirada1, Guang Li1, David Dreizin1, Luke Robinson1, Gauri Khorjekar1, Sergio Dromi1, Thomas Ernst1.   

Abstract

As digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) becomes widely used, radiologists must understand the basic principles of (a) image acquisition, (b) artifacts, and (c) quality control (QC) that are specific to DBT. Standard acquisition parameters common to both full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and DBT are combinations of x-ray tube voltage, current exposure time, and anode target and filter combinations. Image acquisition parameters specific to DBT include tube motion, sweep angle, and number of projections. Continuous tube motion or x-ray emission decreases imaging time but leads to focal spot blurring when compared with step-and-shoot techniques. The sweep angle and number of projections determines resolution. Wider sweep angles allow greater out-of-plane (z-axis) resolution, improving visualization of masses and architecture distortion. A greater number of projections increases in-plane or x-y axis resolution, improving visualization of microcalcifications. Artifacts related to DBT include blurring-ripple, truncation, and loss of skin and superficial tissue resolution. Motion artifacts are difficult to recognize because of inherent out-of-plane blurring. To maintain optimal image quality and an "as low as reasonably achievable" (ALARA) radiation dose, regular QC must be performed. DBT is considered a new imaging modality; therefore, breast imaging facilities are required to obtain a separate certification in addition to that in FFDM, and all personnel (radiologists, technologists, and medical physicists) are mandated to complete initial DBT training and maintain appropriate continuing medical education credits. ©RSNA, 2019.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30768362     DOI: 10.1148/rg.2019180046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  8 in total

Review 1.  Digital tomosynthesis of the pediatric elbow.

Authors:  Matthew A Zapala; Kristin Livingston; Andrew S Phelps; John D MacKenzie
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-11-04

2.  Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography, digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis for microcalcifications and margins to microcalcifications in breast specimens.

Authors:  Claudia Neubauer; Jannina Samantha Yilmaz; Peter Bronsert; Martin Pichotka; Fabian Bamberg; Marisa Windfuhr-Blum; Thalia Erbes; Jakob Neubauer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Evaluation of a new image reconstruction method for digital breast tomosynthesis: effects on the visibility of breast lesions and breast density.

Authors:  Julia Krammer; Sergei Zolotarev; Inge Hillman; Konstantinos Karalis; Dzmitry Stsepankou; Valeriy Vengrinovich; Jürgen Hesser; Tony M Svahn
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  A prototype Multi-X-ray-source array (MXA) for digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Amy E Becker; Andrew M Hernandez; John M Boone; Paul R Schwoebel
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Two-phase learning-based 3D deblurring method for digital breast tomosynthesis images.

Authors:  Yunsu Choi; Minah Han; Hanjoo Jang; Hyunjung Shim; Jongduk Baek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effect of optical blurring of X-ray source on breast tomosynthesis image quality: Modulation transfer function, anatomical noise power spectrum, and signal detectability perspectives.

Authors:  Changwoo Lee; Jongduk Baek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: an Overview.

Authors:  Ekta Dhamija; Malvika Gulati; S V S Deo; Ajay Gogia; Smriti Hari
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-05-15

8.  The measurement of entrance surface dose using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters for determining average glandular dose in digital breast tomosynthesis: Measurement and simulation study.

Authors:  Thunyarat Chusin; Sumalee Yabsantia; Kosuke Matsubara
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.