Larry K Kociolek1, Preeta K Kutty2, Philip M Polgreen3, Susan E Beekmann3. 1. Department of Pediatrics,Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine,Chicago, Illinois. 2. Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion,National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases,Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. 3. Department of Internal Medicine,University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine,Iowa City, Iowa.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To characterize healthcare provider diagnostic testing practices for identifying Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection (CDI) and asymptomatic carriage in children. DESIGN: Electronic survey. METHODS: An 11-question survey was sent by e-mail or facsimile to all pediatric infectious diseases (PID) members of the Infectious Diseases Society of America's Emerging Infections Network (EIN). RESULTS: Among 345 eligible respondents who had ever responded to an EIN survey, 196 (57%) responded; 162 of these (83%) were aware of their institutional policies for CDI testing and management. Also, 159 (98%) respondents knew their institution's C. difficile testing method: 99 (62%) utilize NAAT without toxin testing and 60 (38%) utilize toxin testing, either as a single test or a multistep algorithm. Of 153 respondents, 10 (7%) reported that formed stools were tested for C. difficile at their institution, and 76 of 151 (50%) reported that their institution does not restrict C. difficile testing in infants and young children. The frequency of symptom- and age-based testing restrictions did not vary between institutions utilizing NAAT alone compared to those utilizing toxin testing for C. difficile diagnosis. Of 143 respondents, 26 (16%) permit testing of neonatal intensive care unit patients and 12 of 26 (46%) treat CDI with antibiotics in this patient population. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that there are opportunities to improve CDI diagnostic stewardship practices in children, including among hospitals using NAATs alone for CDI diagnosis in children.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize healthcare provider diagnostic testing practices for identifying Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficileinfection (CDI) and asymptomatic carriage in children. DESIGN: Electronic survey. METHODS: An 11-question survey was sent by e-mail or facsimile to all pediatric infectious diseases (PID) members of the Infectious Diseases Society of America's Emerging Infections Network (EIN). RESULTS: Among 345 eligible respondents who had ever responded to an EIN survey, 196 (57%) responded; 162 of these (83%) were aware of their institutional policies for CDI testing and management. Also, 159 (98%) respondents knew their institution's C. difficile testing method: 99 (62%) utilize NAAT without toxin testing and 60 (38%) utilize toxin testing, either as a single test or a multistep algorithm. Of 153 respondents, 10 (7%) reported that formed stools were tested for C. difficile at their institution, and 76 of 151 (50%) reported that their institution does not restrict C. difficile testing in infants and young children. The frequency of symptom- and age-based testing restrictions did not vary between institutions utilizing NAAT alone compared to those utilizing toxin testing for C. difficile diagnosis. Of 143 respondents, 26 (16%) permit testing of neonatal intensive care unit patients and 12 of 26 (46%) treat CDI with antibiotics in this patient population. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that there are opportunities to improve CDI diagnostic stewardship practices in children, including among hospitals using NAATs alone for CDI diagnosis in children.
Authors: Maribeth R Nicholson; Peter N Freswick; M Cecilia Di Pentima; Li Wang; Kathryn M Edwards; Gregory J Wilson; Thomas R Talbot Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2017-02-21 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Kimberlee S Fong; Cynthia Fatica; Geraldine Hall; Gary Procop; Susan Schindler; Steven M Gordon; Thomas G Fraser Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: L Clifford McDonald; Dale N Gerding; Stuart Johnson; Johan S Bakken; Karen C Carroll; Susan E Coffin; Erik R Dubberke; Kevin W Garey; Carolyn V Gould; Ciaran Kelly; Vivian Loo; Julia Shaklee Sammons; Thomas J Sandora; Mark H Wilcox Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2018-03-19 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Samuel R Dominguez; Susan A Dolan; Kelly West; Raymund B Dantes; Erin Epson; Deborah Friedman; Cynthia A Littlehorn; Lesley E Arms; Karen Walton; Ellen Servetar; Daniel N Frank; Cassandra V Kotter; Elaine Dowell; Carolyn V Gould; Joanne M Hilden; James K Todd Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2014-04-29 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Jacob M Parnell; Irtiqa Fazili; Sarah C Bloch; D Borden Lacy; Valeria A Garcia-Lopez; Rachel Bernard; Eric P Skaar; Kathryn M Edwards; Maribeth R Nicholson Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 3.288