| Literature DB >> 30766777 |
Hongyan Su1, Yan Wang1, Shuo Liu1, Yue Wang1, Qian Liu1, Guangxuan Liu1, Qin Chen1.
Abstract
Transporter-targeted nanoparticulate drug delivery systems (nano-DDS) have emerged as promising nanoplatforms for efficient drug delivery. Recently, great progress in transporter-targeted strategies has been made, especially with the rapid developments in nanotherapeutics. In this review, we outline the recent advances in transporter-targeted nano-DDS. First, the emerging transporter-targeted nano-DDS developed to facilitate oral drug delivery are reviewed. These include improvements in the oral absorption of protein and peptide drugs, facilitating the intravenous-to-oral switch in cancer chemotherapy. Secondly, the recent advances in transporter-assisted brain-targeting nano-DDS are discussed, focusing on the specific transporter-based targeting strategies. Recent developments in transporter-mediated tumor-targeting drug delivery are also discussed. Finally, the possible transport mechanisms involved in transporter-mediated endocytosis are highlighted, with special attention to the latest findings of the interactions between membrane transporters and nano-DDS.Entities:
Keywords: Brain-targeting; Nano-DDS; Oral delivery; Transporter; Tumor-targeting
Year: 2018 PMID: 30766777 PMCID: PMC6361857 DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2018.10.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Pharm Sin B ISSN: 2211-3835 Impact factor: 11.413
Figure 1Emerging trends in the fields of transporter-targeted nano-DDS.
Figure 2Schematic illustration of transepithelial transport of insulin from DNPs to overcome multiple barriers of the intestinal epithelium by exploiting the bile acid pathway. Reprinted with the permission from Ref. 39. Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. DNPs, deoxycholic acid-modified nanoparticles; ASBT, apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter.
Figure 3Graphic illustration of the composition of l-carnitine-conjugated nanoparticles with varied lengths of PEG spacers, and OCTN2-mediated BBB transcytosis and glioma targeting. Reprinted with the permission from Ref. 68. Copyright © 2017 Taylor & Francis Group.
Figure 4Illustration of stepwise synthesis, GLUT1-mediated endocytosis and GSH-triggered 3 intracellular drug release of DPL(s-s)P/DOX micelles. Reprinted with the permission from Ref. 85. Copyright © 2015 American Chemical Society.
Figure 5(A) Competitive study in hPepT1-Hela cells in the presence of typical substrate GlySar (GS); (B) Influence of proton in the culture medium on the cellular uptake of dipeptide modified NPs in hPepT1-Hela cells; The variation of relative PepT1 mRNA expression versus β-actin (C) and the variations of membrane and cytosol PepT1 protein expression (D,E) after treatments with NSPV1000 NPs for different time over 24 h. Data are shown as mean±SD. P<0.05,P<0.01 vs. C6/DTX solution group or control group, P<0.05, P<0.01, n=3; (F) The schematic illustration of hypothesized mechanism of PepT1-mediated endocytosis. Reprinted with the permission from Ref. 42. Copyright © 2018 Taylor & Francis Group.