Literature DB >> 30766651

Movin' on Up? How Perceptions of Social Mobility Affect Our Willingness to Defend the System.

Martin V Day1, Susan T Fiske2.   

Abstract

People's motivation to rationalize and defend the status quo is a major barrier to societal change. Three studies tested whether perceived social mobility - beliefs about the likelihood to move up and down the socioeconomic ladder - can condition people's tendency to engage in system justification. Compared to information suggesting moderate social mobility, exposure to low social-mobility frames consistently reduced defense of the overarching societal system. Two studies examined how this effect occurs. Compared to moderate or baseline conditions, a low social-mobility frame reduced people's endorsement of (typically strong) meritocratic and just-world beliefs, which in turn explained lower system defense. These effects occurred for political liberals, moderates, and conservatives, and could not be explained by other system-legitimizing ideologies or people's beliefs about their own social mobility. Implications for societal change programs are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ideology; Motivation; Social Mobility; System Defense

Year:  2016        PMID: 30766651      PMCID: PMC6371776          DOI: 10.1177/1948550616678454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Psychol Personal Sci        ISSN: 1948-5506


  6 in total

1.  Americans overestimate the intergenerational persistence in income ranks.

Authors:  Siwei Cheng; Fangqi Wen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Psychological Science in the Wake of COVID-19: Social, Methodological, and Metascientific Considerations.

Authors:  Daniel L Rosenfeld; Emily Balcetis; Brock Bastian; Elliot T Berkman; Jennifer K Bosson; Tiffany N Brannon; Anthony L Burrow; C Daryl Cameron; Serena Chen; Jonathan E Cook; Christian Crandall; Shai Davidai; Kristof Dhont; Paul W Eastwick; Sarah E Gaither; Steven W Gangestad; Thomas Gilovich; Kurt Gray; Elizabeth L Haines; Martie G Haselton; Nick Haslam; Gordon Hodson; Michael A Hogg; Matthew J Hornsey; Yuen J Huo; Samantha Joel; Frank J Kachanoff; Gordon Kraft-Todd; Mark R Leary; Alison Ledgerwood; Randy T Lee; Steve Loughnan; Cara C MacInnis; Traci Mann; Damian R Murray; Carolyn Parkinson; Efrén O Pérez; Tom Pyszczynski; Kaylin Ratner; Hank Rothgerber; James D Rounds; Mark Schaller; Roxane Cohen Silver; Barbara A Spellman; Nina Strohminger; Janet K Swim; Felix Thoemmes; Betul Urganci; Joseph A Vandello; Sarah Volz; Vivian Zayas; A Janet Tomiyama
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-10-01

3.  We cannot empathize with what we do not recognize: Perceptions of structural versus interpersonal racism in South Africa.

Authors:  Melike M Fourie; Samantha L Moore-Berg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-28

4.  Information About Inequality of Opportunity Increases Downward Mobility Perceptions: A Population-Wide Randomized Survey Experiment.

Authors:  Alexi Gugushvili
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-04

5.  The Relationship Between Social Mobility Belief and Learning Engagement in Adolescents: The Role of Achievement Goal Orientation and Psychological Capital.

Authors:  Jin Xie; Bo Zhang; Zhendong Yao; Biao Peng; Hong Chen; Juan Gao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-06

6.  Subjective Social Mobility among Migrant Children in China.

Authors:  Wei Lu; Nian Liu; Juan Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.