Literature DB >> 30765371

How often do both core competencies of shared decision making occur in family medicine teaching clinics?

Gisèle Diendéré1, Selma Chipenda Dansokho2, Rhéa Rocque3, Anne-Sophie Julien4, France Légaré5, Luc Côté6, Sonia Mahmoudi7, Philippe Jacob8, Natalia Arias Casais9, Laurie Pilote10, Roland Grad11, Anik M C Giguère12, Holly O Witteman13.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess how often risk communication and values clarification occur in routine family medicine practice and to explore factors associated with their occurrence.
DESIGN: Qualitative and quantitative cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Five university-affiliated family medicine teaching clinics across Quebec. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-one health professionals (55% physicians, 35% residents, 10% nurses or dietitians) and 238 patients (76% women; age range 16 to 82 years old). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The presence or absence of risk communication and values clarification during visits in which decisions were made was determined. Factors associated with the primary outcome (both competencies together) were identified. The OPTION5 (observing patient involvement in decision making) instrument was used to validate the dichotomous outcome.
RESULTS: The presence of risk communication and values clarification during visits was associated with OPTION5 scores (area under the curve of 0.80, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.86, P < .001). Both core competencies of shared decision making occurred in 150 of 238 (63%) visits (95% CI 54% to 70%). Such an occurrence was more likely when the visit included discussion about beginning something new, treatment options, or postponing a decision, as well as when health professionals preferred a collaborative decision-making style and when the visit included more decisions or was longer. Alone, risk communication occurred in 203 of 238 (85%) visits (95% CI 82% to 96%) and values clarification in 162 of 238 (68%) visits (95% CI 61% to 75%).
CONCLUSION: Health professionals in family medicine are making an effort to engage patients in shared decision making in routine daily practice, especially when there is time to do so. The greatest potential for improvement might lie in values clarification; that is, discussing what matters to patients and families. Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30765371      PMCID: PMC6515489     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  52 in total

1.  The myth of standardized workflow in primary care.

Authors:  G Talley Holman; John W Beasley; Ben-Tzion Karsh; Jamie A Stone; Paul D Smith; Tosha B Wetterneck
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Design Features of Explicit Values Clarification Methods: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Holly O Witteman; Laura D Scherer; Teresa Gavaruzzi; Arwen H Pieterse; Andrea Fuhrel-Forbis; Selma Chipenda Dansokho; Nicole Exe; Valerie C Kahn; Deb Feldman-Stewart; Nananda F Col; Alexis F Turgeon; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Do patients benefit from participating in medical decision making? Longitudinal follow-up of women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Thomas F Hack; Lesley F Degner; Peter Watson; Luella Sinha
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Consumers' views of quality in the consultation and their relevance to 'shared decision-making' approaches.

Authors:  A Edwards; G Elwyn; C Smith; S Williams; H Thornton
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Impact of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework on the agreement and the difference between patients' and physicians' decisional conflict.

Authors:  France Légaré; Annette M O'Connor; Ian D Graham; Georges A Wells; Stéphane Tremblay
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Toward shared decision making: using the OPTION scale to analyze resident-patient consultations in family medicine.

Authors:  Marc-André Pellerin; Glyn Elwyn; Michel Rousseau; Dawn Stacey; Hubert Robitaille; France Légaré
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 7.  Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument.

Authors:  Nicolas Couët; Sophie Desroches; Hubert Robitaille; Hugues Vaillancourt; Annie Leblanc; Stéphane Turcotte; Glyn Elwyn; France Légaré
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Training family physicians in shared decision-making to reduce the overuse of antibiotics in acute respiratory infections: a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  France Légaré; Michel Labrecque; Michel Cauchon; Josette Castel; Stéphane Turcotte; Jeremy Grimshaw
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  The right tool is what they need, not what we have: a taxonomy of appropriate levels of precision in patient risk communication.

Authors:  Brian J Zikmund-Fisher
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 3.929

10.  Continuity of primary care: to whom does it matter and when?

Authors:  Paul A Nutting; Meredith A Goodwin; Susan A Flocke; Stephen J Zyzanski; Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

View more
  2 in total

1. 

Authors:  Roland Grad; Guylène Thériault; Harminder Singh; James A Dickinson; Olga Szafran; Neil R Bell
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Age to stop? Appropriate screening in older patients.

Authors:  Roland Grad; Guylène Thériault; Harminder Singh; James A Dickinson; Olga Szafran; Neil R Bell
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.275

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.