Literature DB >> 15669023

Do patients benefit from participating in medical decision making? Longitudinal follow-up of women with breast cancer.

Thomas F Hack1, Lesley F Degner, Peter Watson, Luella Sinha.   

Abstract

This study sought to examine the relationships between decisional role (preferred and assumed) at time of surgical treatment (baseline), congruence between assumed role at baseline and preferred role 3 years later (follow-up), and quality of life at follow-up. Two hundred and five women diagnosed with breast cancer completed the decisional role preference scale at baseline and follow-up, and the EORTC QLQ-C30 at follow-up. A statistically significant number of women had decisional role regret, with most of these women preferring greater involvement in treatment planning than was afforded them. Women who indicated at baseline that they were actively involved in choosing their surgical treatment had significantly higher overall quality of life at follow-up than women who indicated passive involvement. These actively involved women had significantly higher physical and social functioning and significantly less fatigue than women who assumed a passive role. Quality of life was significantly related to reports of experienced involvement in treatment decision making, but not to reports of preferred involvement, or congruence between preferred and experienced involvement. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 15669023     DOI: 10.1002/pon.907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  110 in total

1.  Oncology residents' perspectives on communication skills and shared decision making.

Authors:  Rajiv Samant; Inge Aivas; Jean-Marc Bourque; Tara Tucker
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  The importance and complexity of regret in the measurement of 'good' decisions: a systematic review and a content analysis of existing assessment instruments.

Authors:  Natalie Joseph-Williams; Adrian Edwards; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 3.  Patients' perceptions of sharing in decisions: a systematic review of interventions to enhance shared decision making in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  France Légaré; Stéphane Turcotte; Dawn Stacey; Stéphane Ratté; Jennifer Kryworuchko; Ian D Graham
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Evolution of Patient Decision-Making Regarding Medical Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Alexandra L Mathews; Adriana Coleska; Patricia B Burns; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.794

5.  Considerations of 'fit' and patient involvement in decision making.

Authors:  Vikki A Entwistle
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  A conceptual framework for interprofessional shared decision making in home care: protocol for a feasibility study.

Authors:  France Légaré; Dawn Stacey; Nathalie Brière; Sophie Desroches; Serge Dumont; Kimberley Fraser; Mary-Anne Murray; Anne Sales; Denise Aubé
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Views of treatment decision making from adolescents with chronic illnesses and their parents: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jennifer M Knopf; Richard W Hornung; Gail B Slap; Robert F DeVellis; Maria T Britto
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Quality of life of women treated with radiotherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  T S Lee; S L Kilbreath; K M Refshauge; S C Pendlebury; J M Beith; M J Lee
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Breast cancer treatment decision-making: are we asking too much of patients?

Authors:  Jennifer C Livaudais; Rebeca Franco; Kezhen Fei; Nina A Bickell
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Patient assessments of the most important medical decision during a hospitalization.

Authors:  Thomas V Perneger; Agathe Charvet-Bérard; Arnaud Perrier
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.