Literature DB >> 30764651

PREPARED Study: A Study of Shared Decision-Making for Coronary Artery Disease.

Jacob A Doll1,2, W Schuyler Jones3,4, Yuliya Lokhnygina3, Sara Culpepper4, Robin L Parks5, Christy Calhoun5, David H Au6, Manesh R Patel3,4.   

Abstract

Background Guidelines recommend patient engagement in shared decision-making regarding coronary revascularization, but studies demonstrate poor patient understanding of risks, benefits, and alternatives. Effective strategies are needed to integrate informed patient preferences into clinical care, particularly for patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography. Methods and Results We developed a web-based decision aid to educate patients and survey their treatment preferences before angiography. We compared knowledge, attitudes, and preferences of 203 patients with and without use of the decision aid. In a pilot cluster-randomized study, cardiologists were assigned to receive versus not receive patient preferences, with subsequent assessment of treatment decisions. The median age of participants was 64 years, 62% were men, 74% were white, and a similar number had acute presentation (49% non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina) and stable presentation (51% stable angina or atypical symptoms). Most patients preferred treatment with percutaneous coronary intervention compared with either medical therapy alone (63% versus 21%) or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (81% versus 7%). The decision aid was associated with improved performance on a 6-item knowledge scale (mean, 2.7 versus 2.2 questions correct; P<0.01) and greater interest in shared decision-making but not an overall change in patient preferences. The pilot cluster-randomized study demonstrated the feasibility of integrating patient preference information into clinical care, although providing preferences to the clinicians did not improve concordance between preference and treatment. Conclusions A web-based decision aid was associated with improved patient knowledge and greater desire to participate in shared decision-making for coronary revascularization. Most patients preferred percutaneous coronary intervention to either medical therapy alone or coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Further investigation is needed to determine the impact of patient preferences on clinical decision-making and outcomes. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02272062.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision-xsupport techniques; humans; patient education as topic; patient-centered care

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30764651     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes        ISSN: 1941-7713


  7 in total

Review 1.  Review of Digitalized Patient Education in Cardiology: A Future Ahead?

Authors:  Marinka D Oudkerk Pool; Jean-Luc Q Hooglugt; Marlies P Schijven; Barbara J M Mulder; Berto J Bouma; Robbert J de Winter; Yigal Pinto; Michiel M Winter
Journal:  Cardiology       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 1.869

2.  Age, knowledge, preferences, and risk tolerance for invasive cardiac care.

Authors:  Michael G Nanna; Eric D Peterson; Angie Wu; Tina Harding; Anthony N Galanos; Lisa Wruck; Karen P Alexander
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Understanding the Current Landscape of Health Literacy Interventions within Health Systems.

Authors:  Michael Truong; Susan H Fenton
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2022-03-15

4.  Development and user-testing of a digital patient decision aid to facilitate shared decision-making for people with stable angina.

Authors:  Emma Harris; Dwayne Conway; Angel Jimenez-Aranda; Jeremy Butts; Philippa Hedley-Takhar; Richard Thomson; Felicity Astin
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 3.298

5.  Appropriateness of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease in US Department of Veterans Affairs Hospitals From 2013 to 2015.

Authors:  Paul L Hess; Vinay Kini; Wenhui Liu; Paola Roldan; Patrick Autruong; Gary K Grunwald; Colin O'Donnell; Jacob A Doll; P Michael Ho; Steven M Bradley
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-04-01

6.  At the Crossroads of Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery-Benching Single Hospital Experience to a National Registry: A Plea for Risk Management Technology.

Authors:  Riccardo Cocchieri; Bertus van de Wetering; Sjoerd van Tuijl; Iman Mousavi; Robert Riezebos; Bastian de Mol
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2022-08-11

7.  Nurses' perceptions of patient participation in the myocardial infarction pathway.

Authors:  Elise Kvalsund Bårdsgjerde; Bodil J Landstad; Torstein Hole; Magne Nylenna; Kari Hanne Gjeilo; Marit Kvangarsnes
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2020-06-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.