Jordan J White1, Derek T Dangerfield2, Suzanne M Grieb3. 1. Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland. 2. Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Focus groups are an important learning tool in HIV prevention research among U.S. Black men who have sex with men (BMSM), for whom incidence persists. Focus groups are useful in designing interventions, but many have struggled to engage BMSM in research. To optimize the utility of focus group methodology on HIV prevention among BMSM, this paper offers methodological considerations for conducting and managing focus groups with BMSM. METHODS: Perspectives come from the process of conducting nine focus groups (N = 52) to explore the role of religion and spirituality in the lives of BMSM in Baltimore City and how these concepts could be used to inform local HIV prevention interventions. RESULTS: Themes from field notes captured important concepts to consider regarding the following: recruitment and retention, recruiting from within the social network, screening for HIV status, focus group stratification, and focus group facilitation. DISCUSSION: Considerations and recommendations for mitigating the challenges in focus group research and enriching data collection with BMSM are outlined.
INTRODUCTION: Focus groups are an important learning tool in HIV prevention research among U.S. Black men who have sex with men (BMSM), for whom incidence persists. Focus groups are useful in designing interventions, but many have struggled to engage BMSM in research. To optimize the utility of focus group methodology on HIV prevention among BMSM, this paper offers methodological considerations for conducting and managing focus groups with BMSM. METHODS: Perspectives come from the process of conducting nine focus groups (N = 52) to explore the role of religion and spirituality in the lives of BMSM in Baltimore City and how these concepts could be used to inform local HIV prevention interventions. RESULTS: Themes from field notes captured important concepts to consider regarding the following: recruitment and retention, recruiting from within the social network, screening for HIV status, focus group stratification, and focus group facilitation. DISCUSSION: Considerations and recommendations for mitigating the challenges in focus group research and enriching data collection with BMSM are outlined.
Authors: Kenneth T Jones; Phyllis Gray; Y Omar Whiteside; Terry Wang; Debra Bost; Erica Dunbar; Evelyn Foust; Wayne D Johnson Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2008-04-29 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Leo Wilton; Jeffrey H Herbst; Patricia Coury-Doniger; Thomas M Painter; Gary English; Maria E Alvarez; Maureen Scahill; Michael A Roberson; Basil Lucas; Wayne D Johnson; James W Carey Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2009-03-09
Authors: Derek T Dangerfield; Allison J Ober; Janeane N Anderson; Pamina Gorbach; Ricky N Bluthenthal Journal: Public Health Nurs Date: 2021-08-17 Impact factor: 1.462
Authors: Derek T Dangerfield Ii; Janeane N Anderson; Charleen Wylie; Renata Arrington-Sanders; Ricky N Bluthenthal; Christopher Beyrer; Jason E Farley Journal: JMIR Form Res Date: 2022-08-10
Authors: Jason E Farley; Derek T Dangerfield; Jessica LaRicci; Paul Sacamano; Omeid Heidari; Kelly Lowensen; Jacky M Jennings; Karin E Tobin Journal: Public Health Nurs Date: 2021-03-22 Impact factor: 1.462