Literature DB >> 17518876

Literature review: considerations in undertaking focus group research with culturally and linguistically diverse groups.

Elizabeth J Halcomb1, Leila Gholizadeh, Michelle DiGiacomo, Jane Phillips, Patricia M Davidson.   

Abstract

AIMS: This integrated literature review seeks to identify the key considerations in conducting focus groups and discusses the specific considerations for focus group research with culturally and linguistically diverse groups.
BACKGROUND: The focus group method is a technique of group interview that generates data through the opinions expressed by participants. Focus groups have become an increasingly popular method of data collection in health care research. Although focus groups have been used extensively with Western populations, they are a particularly useful tool for engaging culturally and linguistically diverse populations. The success of focus groups in this context is dependent upon the cultural competence of the research team and the research questions.
METHODS: The electronic databases Medline, CINAHL, Embase, Psychlit and the Internet using the Google Scholar search engine were explored using the search terms 'focus group', 'cultural sensitivity', 'transcultural nursing', 'transcultural care', 'cultural diversity' and 'ethnic groups'. Hand searching of reference lists and relevant journals was also undertaken. English language articles were selected for the review if they discussed the following issues: (i) methodological implications of the focus group method; (ii) strengths and limitations of the focus group method; (iii) recommendations for researchers and (iv) use of the focus group in culturally and linguistically diverse groups. Conclusions were drawn from each of the articles and consensus regarding a summary of recommendations was derived from a minimum of two authors.
RESULTS: Findings from this review revealed several key issues involving focus group implementation including recruitment, sample size, data collection, data analysis and use within multicultural populations. Strengths and limitations of the focus group method were also identified.
CONCLUSIONS: Focus groups are a useful tool to expand existing knowledge about service provision and identify consumer needs that will assist in the development of future intervention programmes, particularly within multicultural populations. Careful planning related to methodological and pragmatic issues are critical in deriving effective data and protecting participants. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Focus groups can facilitate increased understanding of perspectives of culturally and linguistically diverse groups and thereby shape clinical practice to better meet the needs of these groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17518876     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01760.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Nurs        ISSN: 0962-1067            Impact factor:   3.036


  85 in total

1.  Perceptions related to diet and exercise among Asians and Pacific Islanders with diabetes.

Authors:  Nafanua Braginsky; Jillian Inouye; Chen Yen Wang; Richard Arakaki
Journal:  Hawaii Med J       Date:  2011-09

2.  Assessment of patient perceptions of genomic testing to inform pharmacogenomic implementation.

Authors:  Yee Ming Lee; Ryan P McKillip; Brittany A Borden; Catherine E Klammer; Mark J Ratain; Peter H O'Donnell
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Primary prevention for resettled refugees from Burma: where to begin?

Authors:  Heather-Lyn Haley; Meredith Walsh; Nang H Tin Maung; Clara P Savage; Suzanne Cashman
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2014-02

4.  Is channel segmentation necessary to reach a multiethnic population with weight-related health promotion? An analysis of use and perception of communication channels.

Authors:  Marieke A Hartman; Vera Nierkens; Stephan W Cremer; Arnoud Verhoeff; Karien Stronks
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  Methodological considerations for conducting focus groups in HIV prevention research among Black men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Jordan J White; Derek T Dangerfield; Suzanne M Grieb
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 1.462

6.  Capacity building through focus group training in community-based participatory research.

Authors:  K L Amico; M L Wieland; J A Weis; S M Sullivan; J A Nigon; I G Sia
Journal:  Educ Health (Abingdon)       Date:  2011-12-04

7.  Barriers and Facilitators of Pap Testing for Women Living With HIV: A Focus Group Study.

Authors:  Sophie Jin; Joycelyn Cudjoe; Alexis Peay; Dorcas Baker; Jennifer Kunkel; Phyllis Sharps; Hae-Ra Han
Journal:  J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care       Date:  2020 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.354

8.  Knowledge, perceptions, and decision making about human papillomavirus vaccination among Korean American women: a focus group study.

Authors:  Kyounghae Kim; Boyoung Kim; Eunsuk Choi; Youngshin Song; Hae-Ra Han
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

9.  Development of labeled magnitude scales for the assessment of pain of dentin hypersensitivity.

Authors:  Lisa J Heaton; Ashley P Barlow; Susan E Coldwell
Journal:  J Orofac Pain       Date:  2013

10.  Perceptions of addiction, attempts to quit, and successful quitting in nondaily and daily smokers.

Authors:  Carla J Berg; Gillian L Schauer; Taneisha S Buchanan; Kymberle Sterling; Carla DeSisto; Erika A Pinsker; Jasjit S Ahluwalia
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2013-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.