Susan C Van Schalkwyk1, Janet Hafler2, Timothy F Brewer3, Moira A Maley4, Carmi Margolis5, Lakshini McNamee1, Ilse Meyer1, Michael J Peluso6, Ana Ms Schmutz1, Judy M Spak7, David Davies8. 1. Centre for Health Professions Education, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa. 2. Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. 3. Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, David Geffen School of Medicine and Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA. 4. Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia. 5. Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel. 6. Division of Infectious Diseases, University of California-San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA. 7. Cushing/Whitney Medical Library, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. 8. Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Transformative learning (TL) has been described as learning that challenges established perspectives, leading to new ways of being in the world. As a learning theory it has resonated with educators globally, including those in the health professions. Described as a complex metatheory, TL has evolved over time, eliciting divergent interpretations of the construct. This scoping review provides a comprehensive synthesis of how TL is currently represented in the health professions education literature, including how it influences curricular activities, to inform its future application in the field. METHODS: Arksey and O'Malley's six-step framework was adopted to review the period from 2006 to May 2018. A total of 10 bibliographic databases were searched, generating 1532 potential studies. After several rounds of review, first of abstracts and then of full texts, 99 studies were mapped by two independent reviewers onto the internally developed data extraction sheet. Descriptive information about included studies was aggregated. Discursive data were subjected to content analysis. RESULTS: A mix of conceptual and empirical research papers, which used a range of qualitative methodologies, were included. Studies from the USA, the UK and Australia were most prevalent. Insights relating to how opportunities for TL were created, how it manifests and influences behaviour, as well as how it is experienced, demonstrated much congruency. Conceptions of TL were seen to be clustered around the work of key theorists. CONCLUSIONS: The training of health professionals often takes place in unfamiliar settings where students are encouraged to be active participants in providing care. This increases the opportunity for exposure to learning experiences that are potentially transformative, allowing for a pedagogy of uncertainty that acknowledges the complexity of the world we live in and questions what we believe we know about it. TL provides educators in the health professions with a theoretical lens through which they can view such student learning.
CONTEXT: Transformative learning (TL) has been described as learning that challenges established perspectives, leading to new ways of being in the world. As a learning theory it has resonated with educators globally, including those in the health professions. Described as a complex metatheory, TL has evolved over time, eliciting divergent interpretations of the construct. This scoping review provides a comprehensive synthesis of how TL is currently represented in the health professions education literature, including how it influences curricular activities, to inform its future application in the field. METHODS: Arksey and O'Malley's six-step framework was adopted to review the period from 2006 to May 2018. A total of 10 bibliographic databases were searched, generating 1532 potential studies. After several rounds of review, first of abstracts and then of full texts, 99 studies were mapped by two independent reviewers onto the internally developed data extraction sheet. Descriptive information about included studies was aggregated. Discursive data were subjected to content analysis. RESULTS: A mix of conceptual and empirical research papers, which used a range of qualitative methodologies, were included. Studies from the USA, the UK and Australia were most prevalent. Insights relating to how opportunities for TL were created, how it manifests and influences behaviour, as well as how it is experienced, demonstrated much congruency. Conceptions of TL were seen to be clustered around the work of key theorists. CONCLUSIONS: The training of health professionals often takes place in unfamiliar settings where students are encouraged to be active participants in providing care. This increases the opportunity for exposure to learning experiences that are potentially transformative, allowing for a pedagogy of uncertainty that acknowledges the complexity of the world we live in and questions what we believe we know about it. TL provides educators in the health professions with a theoretical lens through which they can view such student learning.
Authors: Kathleen Huth; Laura Amar-Dolan; Jennifer M Perez; Donna Luff; Amy P Cohen; Laurie Glader; Alan Leichtner; Lori R Newman Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2020-05-11 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Arman A Shahriar; Kriti Prasad; Katherine Casty; Zarin I Rahman; Michael Westerhaus; David J Satin Journal: Adv Med Educ Pract Date: 2021-06-01
Authors: Jennie C De Gagne; Paula D Koppel; Hyeyoung K Park; Allen Cadavero; Eunji Cho; Sharron Rushton; Sandra S Yamane; Kim Manturuk; Dukyoo Jung Journal: JMIR Med Educ Date: 2021-06-22