Literature DB >> 30761516

Long-term clinical results of biodegradable vascular scaffold ABSORB BVS™ using the PSP-technique in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Jarosław Hiczkiewicz1, Sylwia Iwańczyk2, Aleksander Araszkiewicz3, Magdalena Łanocha3, Dariusz Hiczkiewicz1, Stefan Grajek3, Maciej Lesiak3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The PSP (predilatation, sizing, post-dilatation)-technique was developed to improve the prognosis of patients after bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation. In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) the use of BVS is particularly demanding and carries some potential risk regarding aggressive lesion preparation, proper vessel sizing due to spasm and thrombus inside the artery. The aim herein, was to determine the long-term results of BVS stenting in ACS patients depending on the scaffold implantation technique.
METHODS: The present study is a prospective, two-center study, which consisted of 182 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with BVS (Absorb, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California, USA) implantation for the ACS. All patients were divided into two groups. The first consisted of 52 patients treated with the PSP-technique (PSP group). The second group enrolled 130 patients treated with a non-PSP procedure (non-PSP group).
RESULTS: The procedure was successful in all patients. The mean observation time was 28.8 ± 16.5 months (median 28.3 months, interquartile range 24.0 [17.0-41.0] months). It was found that target vessel failure (TVF) was consistently reduced in patients using the PSP-technique as compared with the non-PSP group (5.8% vs. 17.7%, p = 0.03). Moreover, PSP-technique was superior to non-PSP-technique concerning major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (3.7% vs. 22.3%, p = 0.02). Logistic regression analysis revealed that the use of PSP technique significantly decreased the risk of target vessel revascularization (odds ratio [OR] 0.11, p = 0.01), TVF (OR 0.28, p = 0.03) and MACE (OR 0.29, p = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: The PSP-technique for BVS implantation improves long-term results and should also be recommended for newer generations of the bioresorbable scaffold.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NSTEMI; STEMI; acute coronary syndrome; acute myocardial infarction; angiography; bioresorbable devices/polymers; coronary

Year:  2019        PMID: 30761516      PMCID: PMC8079112          DOI: 10.5603/CJ.a2019.0018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiol J        ISSN: 1898-018X            Impact factor:   2.737


  32 in total

1.  Sirolimus-eluting versus uncoated stents in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Christian Spaulding; Patrick Henry; Emmanuel Teiger; Kevin Beatt; Ezio Bramucci; Didier Carrié; Michel S Slama; Bela Merkely; Andrejs Erglis; Massimo Margheri; Olivier Varenne; Ana Cebrian; Hans-Peter Stoll; David B Snead; Christoph Bode
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold Thrombosis: Multicenter Comprehensive Analysis of Clinical Presentation, Mechanisms, and Predictors.

Authors:  Serban Puricel; Florim Cuculi; Melissa Weissner; Axel Schmermund; Peiman Jamshidi; Tobias Nyffenegger; Harald Binder; Holger Eggebrecht; Thomas Münzel; Stephane Cook; Tommaso Gori
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Are BVS suitable for ACS patients? Support from a large single center real live registry.

Authors:  C M Felix; Y Onuma; J M Fam; R Diletti; Y Ishibashi; A Karanasos; B R C Everaert; N M D A van Mieghem; J Daemen; P P T de Jaegere; F Zijlstra; E S Regar; R J M van Geuns
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 4.164

4.  Initial experience with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for treatment of patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction: a propensity-matched comparison to metallic drug eluting stents 18-month follow-up of the BVS STEMI first study.

Authors:  Jiang Ming Fam; Cordula Felix; Robert Jan van Geuns; Yoshinobu Onuma; Nicolas M Van Mieghem; Antonios Karanasos; Jors van der Sijde; Marcella De Paolis; Evelyn Regar; Marco Valgimigli; Joost Daemen; Peter de Jaegere; Felix Zijlstra; Roberto Diletti
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 6.534

5.  Clinical, Angiographic, and Procedural Correlates of Acute, Subacute, and Late Absorb Scaffold Thrombosis.

Authors:  Stephen G Ellis; Giuseppe Steffenino; Dean J Kereiakes; Gregg W Stone; R J van Geuns; Alexandre Abizaid; Holger Nef; Bernardo Cortese; Luca Testa; Maurizio Menichelli; Corrado Tamburino; Tommaso Gori; Takeshi Kimura; Patrick W Serruys; Salvatore Brugaletta; Manel Sabaté; Run-Lin Gao
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 11.195

6.  Comparison of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold with an everolimus-eluting metallic stent for the treatment of coronary artery stenosis (ABSORB II): a 3 year, randomised, controlled, single-blind, multicentre clinical trial.

Authors:  Patrick W Serruys; Bernard Chevalier; Yohei Sotomi; Angel Cequier; Didier Carrié; Jan J Piek; Ad J Van Boven; Marcello Dominici; Dariusz Dudek; Dougal McClean; Steffen Helqvist; Michael Haude; Sebastian Reith; Manuel de Sousa Almeida; Gianluca Campo; Andrés Iñiguez; Manel Sabaté; Stephan Windecker; Yoshinobu Onuma
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-10-30       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Beyond the early stages: insights from the ASSURE registry on bioresorbable vascular scaffolds.

Authors:  Jochen Wöhrle; Christoph Naber; Thomas Schmitz; Carsten Schwencke; Norbert Frey; Christian Butter; Johannes Brachmann; Maja Ingwersen; Anna Drabik; Sinisa Markovic; Detlef G Mathey
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 6.534

8.  Paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Gregg W Stone; Alexandra J Lansky; Stuart J Pocock; Bernard J Gersh; George Dangas; S Chiu Wong; Bernhard Witzenbichler; Giulio Guagliumi; Jan Z Peruga; Bruce R Brodie; Dariusz Dudek; Martin Möckel; Andrzej Ochala; Alison Kellock; Helen Parise; Roxana Mehran
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Fracture of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold After Side-Branch Balloon Dilation in Bifurcation Coronary Narrowings.

Authors:  Manuel Pan; Miguel Romero; Soledad Ojeda; Javier Suarez de Lezo; Jose Segura; Francisco Mazuelos; Pedro Martin; Alfonso Medina; Jose Suarez de Lezo
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  3-Year Clinical Outcomes With Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffolds: The ABSORB III Trial.

Authors:  Dean J Kereiakes; Stephen G Ellis; Christopher Metzger; Ronald P Caputo; David G Rizik; Paul S Teirstein; Marc R Litt; Annapoorna Kini; Ameer Kabour; Steven O Marx; Jeffrey J Popma; Robert McGreevy; Zhen Zhang; Charles Simonton; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  1 in total

1.  Factors associated with long-term major adverse cardiac events of coronary bioresorbable vascular scaffold.

Authors:  Andrew Kei-Yan Ng; Pauline Yeung Ng; Chung-Wah Siu; Man-Hong Jim
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2021-01-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.