Jarosław Hiczkiewicz1, Sylwia Iwańczyk2, Aleksander Araszkiewicz3, Magdalena Łanocha3, Dariusz Hiczkiewicz1, Stefan Grajek3, Maciej Lesiak3. 1. Department of Cardiology, Multidisciplinary District's Hospital, University of Zielona Góra, Chałubińskiego 7, 67-100 Nowa Sól, Poland. 2. 1st Department of Cardiology, University of Medical Sciences,Poznan, Poland, Dluga 1/2, 61-848 Poznan, Poland. syl.iwanczyk@gmail.com. 3. 1st Department of Cardiology, University of Medical Sciences,Poznan, Poland, Dluga 1/2, 61-848 Poznan, Poland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The PSP (predilatation, sizing, post-dilatation)-technique was developed to improve the prognosis of patients after bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation. In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) the use of BVS is particularly demanding and carries some potential risk regarding aggressive lesion preparation, proper vessel sizing due to spasm and thrombus inside the artery. The aim herein, was to determine the long-term results of BVS stenting in ACS patients depending on the scaffold implantation technique. METHODS: The present study is a prospective, two-center study, which consisted of 182 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with BVS (Absorb, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California, USA) implantation for the ACS. All patients were divided into two groups. The first consisted of 52 patients treated with the PSP-technique (PSP group). The second group enrolled 130 patients treated with a non-PSP procedure (non-PSP group). RESULTS: The procedure was successful in all patients. The mean observation time was 28.8 ± 16.5 months (median 28.3 months, interquartile range 24.0 [17.0-41.0] months). It was found that target vessel failure (TVF) was consistently reduced in patients using the PSP-technique as compared with the non-PSP group (5.8% vs. 17.7%, p = 0.03). Moreover, PSP-technique was superior to non-PSP-technique concerning major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (3.7% vs. 22.3%, p = 0.02). Logistic regression analysis revealed that the use of PSP technique significantly decreased the risk of target vessel revascularization (odds ratio [OR] 0.11, p = 0.01), TVF (OR 0.28, p = 0.03) and MACE (OR 0.29, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The PSP-technique for BVS implantation improves long-term results and should also be recommended for newer generations of the bioresorbable scaffold.
BACKGROUND: The PSP (predilatation, sizing, post-dilatation)-technique was developed to improve the prognosis of patients after bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation. In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) the use of BVS is particularly demanding and carries some potential risk regarding aggressive lesion preparation, proper vessel sizing due to spasm and thrombus inside the artery. The aim herein, was to determine the long-term results of BVS stenting in ACS patients depending on the scaffold implantation technique. METHODS: The present study is a prospective, two-center study, which consisted of 182 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with BVS (Absorb, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California, USA) implantation for the ACS. All patients were divided into two groups. The first consisted of 52 patients treated with the PSP-technique (PSP group). The second group enrolled 130 patients treated with a non-PSP procedure (non-PSP group). RESULTS: The procedure was successful in all patients. The mean observation time was 28.8 ± 16.5 months (median 28.3 months, interquartile range 24.0 [17.0-41.0] months). It was found that target vessel failure (TVF) was consistently reduced in patients using the PSP-technique as compared with the non-PSP group (5.8% vs. 17.7%, p = 0.03). Moreover, PSP-technique was superior to non-PSP-technique concerning major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (3.7% vs. 22.3%, p = 0.02). Logistic regression analysis revealed that the use of PSP technique significantly decreased the risk of target vessel revascularization (odds ratio [OR] 0.11, p = 0.01), TVF (OR 0.28, p = 0.03) and MACE (OR 0.29, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The PSP-technique for BVS implantation improves long-term results and should also be recommended for newer generations of the bioresorbable scaffold.
Authors: Christian Spaulding; Patrick Henry; Emmanuel Teiger; Kevin Beatt; Ezio Bramucci; Didier Carrié; Michel S Slama; Bela Merkely; Andrejs Erglis; Massimo Margheri; Olivier Varenne; Ana Cebrian; Hans-Peter Stoll; David B Snead; Christoph Bode Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-09-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: C M Felix; Y Onuma; J M Fam; R Diletti; Y Ishibashi; A Karanasos; B R C Everaert; N M D A van Mieghem; J Daemen; P P T de Jaegere; F Zijlstra; E S Regar; R J M van Geuns Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2016-05-13 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Jiang Ming Fam; Cordula Felix; Robert Jan van Geuns; Yoshinobu Onuma; Nicolas M Van Mieghem; Antonios Karanasos; Jors van der Sijde; Marcella De Paolis; Evelyn Regar; Marco Valgimigli; Joost Daemen; Peter de Jaegere; Felix Zijlstra; Roberto Diletti Journal: EuroIntervention Date: 2016-05-17 Impact factor: 6.534
Authors: Patrick W Serruys; Bernard Chevalier; Yohei Sotomi; Angel Cequier; Didier Carrié; Jan J Piek; Ad J Van Boven; Marcello Dominici; Dariusz Dudek; Dougal McClean; Steffen Helqvist; Michael Haude; Sebastian Reith; Manuel de Sousa Almeida; Gianluca Campo; Andrés Iñiguez; Manel Sabaté; Stephan Windecker; Yoshinobu Onuma Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-10-30 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jochen Wöhrle; Christoph Naber; Thomas Schmitz; Carsten Schwencke; Norbert Frey; Christian Butter; Johannes Brachmann; Maja Ingwersen; Anna Drabik; Sinisa Markovic; Detlef G Mathey Journal: EuroIntervention Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 6.534
Authors: Gregg W Stone; Alexandra J Lansky; Stuart J Pocock; Bernard J Gersh; George Dangas; S Chiu Wong; Bernhard Witzenbichler; Giulio Guagliumi; Jan Z Peruga; Bruce R Brodie; Dariusz Dudek; Martin Möckel; Andrzej Ochala; Alison Kellock; Helen Parise; Roxana Mehran Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-05-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Manuel Pan; Miguel Romero; Soledad Ojeda; Javier Suarez de Lezo; Jose Segura; Francisco Mazuelos; Pedro Martin; Alfonso Medina; Jose Suarez de Lezo Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2015-07-16 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Dean J Kereiakes; Stephen G Ellis; Christopher Metzger; Ronald P Caputo; David G Rizik; Paul S Teirstein; Marc R Litt; Annapoorna Kini; Ameer Kabour; Steven O Marx; Jeffrey J Popma; Robert McGreevy; Zhen Zhang; Charles Simonton; Gregg W Stone Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2017-10-31 Impact factor: 24.094