| Literature DB >> 30759809 |
Lorenzo Albanese1, Alessandra Bonetti2, Luigi Paolo D'Acqui3, Francesco Meneguzzo4, Federica Zabini5.
Abstract
Extracts from parts of coniferous trees have received increased interest due to their valuable bioactive compounds and properties, useful for plenty of experimental and consolidated applications, in fields comprising nutraceutics, cosmetics, pharmacology, food preservation, and stimulation of plant growth. However, the variability of the bioactive properties, the complexity of the extraction methods, and the use of potentially harmful synthetic chemicals, still represent an obstacle to the spreading of such valuable natural compounds. Hydrodynamic cavitation is emerging as a promising innovative technique for the extraction of precious food components and by-products from waste raw material of the agro-food production chain, which can improve processing efficiency, reduce resource consumption, and produce healthy, high-quality products. In this study, a process based on controlled hydrodynamic cavitation was applied for the first time to the production of aqueous solutions of silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) needles with enhanced antioxidant activity. The observed levels of the in vitro antioxidant activity, comparable or higher than those found for reference substances, pure extracts, and other water extracts and beverages, highlight the very good potential of the hydrodynamic cavitation (HC) process for the creation of solvent-free, aqueous solutions endowed with bioactive compounds extracted from silver fir needles.Entities:
Keywords: Abies alba Mill.; antioxidant activity; coniferous trees; essential oils; flavonoids; food preservation; green extraction; hydrodynamic cavitation; nutraceutics; polyphenols
Year: 2019 PMID: 30759809 PMCID: PMC6406287 DOI: 10.3390/foods8020065
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Experimental hydrodynamic cavitation (HC)-based installation. 1—centrifugal pump, 2—HC reactor, 3—main vessel, 4—cover, 5—discharge.
Figure 2(a) View of a portion of the mixed firs forest; (b) silver fir twigs and needles.
Figure 3(a) Joint evolution of temperature (T) and total phenolic content (TPC) for tests SFN_T1 (Silver Fir Needles—Test 1) and SFN_T2 (Silver Fir Needles—Test 2); (b) Joint evolution of temperature (T) and total flavonoids content (TFC) for tests SFN_T1 and SFN_T2. Error bars represent the standard deviations.
2.20-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) antioxidant activities, with the respective standard deviations, for test SFN_T1 (Silver Fir Needles—Test 1). Superscripts indicate indistinguishable values (p > 0.05).
| Time (min) | T (°C) | DPPH (IC50, μg/mL) | ORAC (μMTE/L) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 27.0 | ||
| 15 | 33.0 | 16.5 ± 1.0 a | 201.7 ± 14.0 b |
| 30 | 40.0 | 14.4 ± 0.7 a | 163.0 ± 11.4 b |
| 45 | 47.0 | 10.1 ± 0.4 | 184.6 ± 12.9 b |
| 60 | 54.0 | 44.0 ± 2.1 | 457.9 ± 24.1 |
| 75 | 61.5 | 150.5 ± 8.4 | 585.9 ± 27.1 |
| 90 | 67.5 | 350.8 ± 23.7 | 295.4 ± 18.7 |
IC50: The Effective Concentration values.
DPPH and ORAC antioxidant activities, with the respective standard deviations, for test SFN_T2 (Silver Fir Needles—Test 2). Superscripts, in any column, indicate indistinguishable values (p > 0.05).
| Time (min) | T (°C) | DPPH (IC50, μg/mL) | ORAC (μMTE/L) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 31.5 | ||
| 5 | 33.0 | 27.4 ± 1.6 | 190.6 ± 7.3 c |
| 15 | 37.5 | 19.5 ± 0.9 a | 186.6 ± 18.1 c |
| 30 | 43.0 | 19.5 ± 0.9 a | 393.8 ± 25.6 |
| 45 | 43.0 | 13.7 ± 0.5 b | 497.9 ± 22.8 |
| 60 | 43.0 | 14.7 ± 0.8 b | 840.8 ± 31.4 |
TPC, TFC, DPPH (IC50), and ORAC levels, with the respective standard deviations, measured at different times after tests SFN_T1 and SFN_T2. Data refer to samples collected after 60 min of process time in each test. Superscripts indicate indistinguishable values (p > 0.05). Difference expressed as % change compared to the initial value.
| SFN_T1 | SFN_T2 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 1 | Day 48 | Diff. | Day 1 | Day 9 | Diff. | |
| 0.103 ± 0.002 | 0.053 ± 0.007 | −48% | 0.131 ± 0.002 | 0.091 ± 0.003 | −31% | |
| 0.363 ± 0.002 | 0.209 ± 0.004 | −42% | 0.432 ± 0.001 | 0.309 ± 0.002 | −28% | |
| 44.0 ± 2.1 | 65.8 ± 3.0 | 50% | 14.7 ± 0.8 a | 14.4 ± 1.0 a | 0% | |
| 457.9 ± 24.1 | 128.3 ± 8.5 | −72% | 840.8 ± 31.4 | 152.3 ± 5.7 | −82% | |
The total phenolic content (TPC); The total flavonoids content (TFC); Diff.: Difference.
DPPH antioxidant activity: the highest level (lowest IC50) found in this study, and levels found for other substances. Where available, the respective standard deviations are indicated.
| Substance | DPPH (IC50, μg/mL) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|
| 10.1 ± 0.4 | This study a | |
| Ascorbic acid (reference substance) | 5.85 | [ |
| Ascorbic acid (reference substance) | 7.62 | [ |
| Ascorbic acid (reference substance) | 20 ± 1.3 | [ |
| Ascorbic acid (reference substance) | 50 | [ |
| Resveratrol (reference substance) | 16.62 | [ |
| Quercetin (reference substance) | 10.5 ± 4.6 | [ |
| Butylated hydroxytoluene | 11.58 | [ |
| Butylated hydroxytoluene | 21.30 | [ |
| α-Tocopherol (vitamin E) | 27.1 | [ |
| Epigalocatechin gallate (a type of catechin) | 7.06 | [ |
| 27 ± 6.3 | [ | |
| Clove (essential oil) | 13.2 ± 2.9 | [ |
| 35.46 | [ | |
| 22.7 ± 0.6 | [ | |
| 270 | [ |
a Lowest level of DPPH IC50 observed throughout the tests. b Crude extract. c Hot water extract.
ORAC antioxidant activity and TPC levels, with the respective standard deviations, from this study, and from a previous study (the TPC levels were referred to the volume of 1 L).
| Substance | ORAC (μMTE/L) | TPC (mgGAE/L) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 186.6 ± 18.1 | 74 ± 4 | This study a | |
| 497.9 ± 22.8 | 108 ± 2 | This study b | |
| 840.8 ± 31.4 | 131 ± 2 | This study c | |
| Iced white tea | 2700 ± 300 | 900 ± 0 | [ |
| Iced black tea | 3100 ± 200 | 400 ± 0 | |
| Apple juice | 4800 ± 1000 | 400 ± 100 | |
| Iced green tea | 5300 ± 1900 | 800 ± 100 | |
| Orange juice | 7400 ± 500 | 700 ± 100 | |
| Cranberry juice | 15,400 ± 2100 | 1700 ± 200 | |
| Blueberry juice | 20,600 ± 2900 | 2300 ± 400 | |
| Red wine | 25,700 ± 2100 | 3500 ± 100 |
a 15 min of process time. b 45 min of process time. c 60 min of process time.
Figure 4ORAC (The oxygen radical absorbance capacity) to TPC (The total phenolic content) ratios for three samples from the test SFN_T2 (this study) and referred to few commercial beverages.
Range of concentrations of the main constituents of EOs for needles of silver fir (Abies alba Mill.), expressed as % w/w of total essential oils (Eos) dry mass.
| Essential Oils | Range of Concentration |
|---|---|
| β-Pinene 1 | 0.51–32.80% |
| Bornyl acetate 1 | 4.40–30.31% |
| delta-3-Carene 1 | 13.85% 3 |
| Camphene 1 | 6.90–19.91% |
| Limonene 1 | 6.10–13.90% |
| α-Pinene 1 | 2.87–17.30% |
| Tricyclene 1 | 0.80–12.90% |
| β-Caryophyllene 2 | 1.30–6.70% |
| α-Humulene 2 | 0.20–3.80% |
| β-Phellandrene | 0.00–4.90% |
| Santene 2 | 1.20–2.00% |
| Myrcene 1 | 0.80–1.00% |
| Terpinolene 1 | 0.30–1.10% |
| Sabinene 1 | 0.10% 1 |
1 Monoterpene. 2 Sesquiterpene. 3 Only one data available.