Michael Winterhalter1,2, Steffen Rex3,4, Christian Stoppe5, Peter Kienbaum2, Hans-Helge Müller6,7, Ines Kaufmann8,9, Hermann Kuppe10, Aristidis Dongas11,12, Bernhard Zwissler8. 1. Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Schmerztherapie, Klinikum Bremen-Mitte gGmbH, Bremen, Germany. 2. Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany. 3. Department of Anesthesiology & Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. steffen.rex@gmail.com. 4. Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum der RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany. steffen.rex@gmail.com. 5. Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum der RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany. 6. Klinische Forschung, IBE - Institut für Medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany. 7. Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany. 8. Klinik für Anästhesiologie, LMU Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany. 9. Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Operative Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Städtisches Klinikum München, Neuperlach, Munich, Germany. 10. Institut für Anästhesiologie, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany. 11. Institut für Anästhesiologie, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany. 12. Klinik für Anästhesiologie und operative Intensivmedizin, Franziskus Hospital Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Perioperative right ventricular (RV) failure due to pressure overload from pulmonary hypertension (PH) worsens postoperative outcomes after cardiac surgery. Inhaled iloprost is a potent pulmonary vasodilator improving RV performance, ameliorating myocardial and pulmonary ischemia-reperfusion injury and attenuating inflammation. We hypothesized that the prophylactic inhalation of iloprost would reduce postoperative ventilation times after cardiac surgery. METHODS: In this phase III, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned 253 cardiac surgical patients at high risk of perioperative RV failure to the prophylactic inhalation of 20 µg iloprost or placebo before and during weaning from extracorporeal circulation. The primary endpoint was the duration of postoperative ventilation. Secondary endpoints included perioperative hemodynamics, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, and 90-day mortality. Safety was assessed by the incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: Iloprost had no significant effect on the median [interquartile range] duration of postoperative ventilation compared with placebo (720 [470-1170] min vs 778 [541-1219] min, respectively; median decrease, 65 min; 95% confidence interval [CI], - 77 to 210; P = 0.37). While the nebulization of iloprost decreased RV afterload and improved cardiac index, major secondary endpoints were not significantly affected. Ninety-day mortality occurred in 14% of the iloprost patients compared with 14% of the placebo patients (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.89; P = 0.93). The incidence of adverse events was comparable in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The prophylactic inhalation of iloprost did not meaningfully improve the outcome in high-risk cardiac surgical patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00927654); registered 25 June, 2009.
PURPOSE: Perioperative right ventricular (RV) failure due to pressure overload from pulmonary hypertension (PH) worsens postoperative outcomes after cardiac surgery. Inhaled iloprost is a potent pulmonary vasodilator improving RV performance, ameliorating myocardial and pulmonary ischemia-reperfusion injury and attenuating inflammation. We hypothesized that the prophylactic inhalation of iloprost would reduce postoperative ventilation times after cardiac surgery. METHODS: In this phase III, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned 253 cardiac surgical patients at high risk of perioperative RV failure to the prophylactic inhalation of 20 µg iloprost or placebo before and during weaning from extracorporeal circulation. The primary endpoint was the duration of postoperative ventilation. Secondary endpoints included perioperative hemodynamics, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, and 90-day mortality. Safety was assessed by the incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: Iloprost had no significant effect on the median [interquartile range] duration of postoperative ventilation compared with placebo (720 [470-1170] min vs 778 [541-1219] min, respectively; median decrease, 65 min; 95% confidence interval [CI], - 77 to 210; P = 0.37). While the nebulization of iloprost decreased RV afterload and improved cardiac index, major secondary endpoints were not significantly affected. Ninety-day mortality occurred in 14% of the iloprost patients compared with 14% of the placebo patients (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.89; P = 0.93). The incidence of adverse events was comparable in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The prophylactic inhalation of iloprost did not meaningfully improve the outcome in high-risk cardiac surgical patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00927654); registered 25 June, 2009.
Authors: James K Kirklin; David C Naftel; Francis D Pagani; Robert L Kormos; Lynne W Stevenson; Elizabeth D Blume; Marissa A Miller; J T Baldwin; J Timothy Baldwin; James B Young Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2014-04-21 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Marc Humbert; Edmund M T Lau; David Montani; Xavier Jaïs; Oliver Sitbon; Gérald Simonneau Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-12-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: B H Dorman; B R Bond; M J Clair; C A Walker; M L Pinosky; S T Reeves; J M Kratz; J L Zellner; A J Crumbley; M M Multani; F G Spinale Journal: J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 2.628
Authors: André Y Denault; Ronald G Pearl; Robert E Michler; Vivek Rao; Steven S L Tsui; Rainald Seitelberger; Matt Cromie; Elisabet Lindberg; Andrea M D'Armini Journal: J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth Date: 2013-03-21 Impact factor: 2.628
Authors: Veli-Pekka Harjola; Alexandre Mebazaa; Jelena Čelutkienė; Dominique Bettex; Hector Bueno; Ovidiu Chioncel; Maria G Crespo-Leiro; Volkmar Falk; Gerasimos Filippatos; Simon Gibbs; Adelino Leite-Moreira; Johan Lassus; Josep Masip; Christian Mueller; Wilfried Mullens; Robert Naeije; Anton Vonk Nordegraaf; John Parissis; Jillian P Riley; Arsen Ristic; Giuseppe Rosano; Alain Rudiger; Frank Ruschitzka; Petar Seferovic; Benjamin Sztrymf; Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Mehmet Birhan Yilmaz; Stavros Konstantinides Journal: Eur J Heart Fail Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 15.534
Authors: S Rex; G Schaelte; S Metzelder; S Flier; E E C de Waal; R Autschbach; R Rossaint; W Buhre Journal: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Date: 2007-11-01 Impact factor: 2.105
Authors: André Y Denault; Jean S Bussières; Ramiro Arellano; Barry Finegan; Paul Gavra; François Haddad; Anne Q N Nguyen; France Varin; Annik Fortier; Sylvie Levesque; Yanfen Shi; Mahsa Elmi-Sarabi; Jean-Claude Tardif; Louis P Perrault; Jean Lambert Journal: Can J Anaesth Date: 2016-07-28 Impact factor: 6.713
Authors: Jonathan E Millar; Jonathon P Fanning; Charles I McDonald; Daniel F McAuley; John F Fraser Journal: Crit Care Date: 2016-11-28 Impact factor: 9.097