Peter Cram1, Lisa M Lix2, Eric Bohm2, Lin Yan2, Leslie Roos2, John Matelski2, Rajiv Gandhi2, Bruce Landon2, William D Leslie2. 1. North American Observatory on Health Systems and Policies (Cram), Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto; Departments of Medicine (Cram) and Surgery (Gandhi), University of Toronto; Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics (Cram), Sinai Health System and University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Community Health Sciences (Lix, Bohm, Yan, Roos), Surgery (Bohm) and Medicine (Leslie), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Biostatistics Research Unit (Matelski) and Arthritis Program (Gandhi), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Health Care Policy (Landon), Harvard Medical School; Division of General Medicine and Primary Care (Landon), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass. peter.cram@uhn.ca. 2. North American Observatory on Health Systems and Policies (Cram), Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto; Departments of Medicine (Cram) and Surgery (Gandhi), University of Toronto; Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics (Cram), Sinai Health System and University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Community Health Sciences (Lix, Bohm, Yan, Roos), Surgery (Bohm) and Medicine (Leslie), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Biostatistics Research Unit (Matelski) and Arthritis Program (Gandhi), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Health Care Policy (Landon), Harvard Medical School; Division of General Medicine and Primary Care (Landon), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nearly 30 years ago, a series of studies showed increased hip fracture mortality in Manitoba compared to the United States, but these data have not been updated. Our objective was to compare the organization of hip fracture care and short-term outcomes in Manitoba and New York State using contemporary data. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of administrative data for all adults aged 50 years or more admitted to hospital with hip fracture between Jan. 1, 2011, and Oct. 31, 2013 in Manitoba and New York State. We compared the 2 jurisdictions with respect to: 1) the proportion of hospitals treating hip fracture and annual hip fracture volume, 2) hospital length of stay, 3) death and 4) hospital readmission. We used descriptive statistics, univariate methods and regression models to compare differences in care between jurisdictions. RESULTS: We identified 2845 patients (mean age 82.2 yr, 2061 women [72.4%]) with hip fracture in Manitoba and 31 524 patients (mean age 81.9 yr, 22 973 women [72.9%]) with hip fracture in New York. A smaller proportion of hospitals in Manitoba than in New York treated hip fracture (7/30 [23%] v. 180/239 [75.3%]) (p < 0.001); the mean annual hospital hip fracture volume was higher in Manitoba (140.0) than in New York (68.9), but the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.2). For patients with femoral neck fractures, the median hospital length of stay was longer in Manitoba than in New York (13 d v. 7 d). The rate of death within 7 days of admission was similar in Manitoba and New York (1.3% v. 2.0%, p = 0.07), although the rate of in-hospital death was higher in Manitoba (5.7% v. 3.5%, p < 0.001). Readmission within 30 days of discharge was less frequent in Manitoba than in New York (9.8% v. 12.0%, p = 0.02). Results were similar for patients with intertrochanteric fractures. INTERPRETATION: Poor short-term outcomes for patients with hip fracture in Manitoba that were documented in the 1980s seem to have been eliminated. Our results should provide optimism that reengineering of clinical care can produce substantive improvements in quality. Copyright 2019, Joule Inc. or its licensors.
BACKGROUND: Nearly 30 years ago, a series of studies showed increased hip fracture mortality in Manitoba compared to the United States, but these data have not been updated. Our objective was to compare the organization of hip fracture care and short-term outcomes in Manitoba and New York State using contemporary data. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of administrative data for all adults aged 50 years or more admitted to hospital with hip fracture between Jan. 1, 2011, and Oct. 31, 2013 in Manitoba and New York State. We compared the 2 jurisdictions with respect to: 1) the proportion of hospitals treating hip fracture and annual hip fracture volume, 2) hospital length of stay, 3) death and 4) hospital readmission. We used descriptive statistics, univariate methods and regression models to compare differences in care between jurisdictions. RESULTS: We identified 2845 patients (mean age 82.2 yr, 2061 women [72.4%]) with hip fracture in Manitoba and 31 524 patients (mean age 81.9 yr, 22 973 women [72.9%]) with hip fracture in New York. A smaller proportion of hospitals in Manitoba than in New York treated hip fracture (7/30 [23%] v. 180/239 [75.3%]) (p < 0.001); the mean annual hospital hip fracture volume was higher in Manitoba (140.0) than in New York (68.9), but the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.2). For patients with femoral neck fractures, the median hospital length of stay was longer in Manitoba than in New York (13 d v. 7 d). The rate of death within 7 days of admission was similar in Manitoba and New York (1.3% v. 2.0%, p = 0.07), although the rate of in-hospital death was higher in Manitoba (5.7% v. 3.5%, p < 0.001). Readmission within 30 days of discharge was less frequent in Manitoba than in New York (9.8% v. 12.0%, p = 0.02). Results were similar for patients with intertrochanteric fractures. INTERPRETATION: Poor short-term outcomes for patients with hip fracture in Manitoba that were documented in the 1980s seem to have been eliminated. Our results should provide optimism that reengineering of clinical care can produce substantive improvements in quality. Copyright 2019, Joule Inc. or its licensors.
Authors: Peter Cram; Saket Girotra; John Matelski; Maria Koh; Bruce E Landon; Lu Han; Douglas S Lee; Dennis T Ko Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2020-01-20
Authors: Peter Cram; Mark E Cohen; Clifford Ko; Bruce E Landon; Bruce Hall; Timothy D Jackson Journal: World J Surg Date: 2022-01-31 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Peter Cram; Bruce E Landon; John Matelski; Vicki Ling; Anthony V Perruccio; J Michael Paterson; Y Raja Rampersaud Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 3.241
Authors: Emil Schemitsch; Jonathan D Adachi; Jacques P Brown; Jean-Eric Tarride; Natasha Burke; Thiago Oliveira; Lubomira Slatkovska Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2021-08-11 Impact factor: 4.507