Literature DB >> 33941152

Primary hemiarthroplasty after unstable trochanteric fracture in elderly patients: mortality, readmission and reoperation.

Tzu-Chieh Lin1,2, Pin-Wen Wang1, Chun-Teng Lin3, Yu-Jun Chang4, Ying-Ju Lin5,6, Wen-Miin Liang7, Jeff Chien-Fu Lin8,9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most unstable trochanteric fractures are treated with internal fixation and often with high complication rates. Hemiarthroplasty might be an alternative method in difficult condition, especially in unstable comminuted fracture in fragile bone. However, few have investigated the long-term outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for unstable trochanteric fracture. We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of trochanteric fracture after primary hemiarthroplasty using competing risk analysis on their long-term outcomes, including mortality, readmission and reoperation.
METHODS: We studied a total of 2798 patients over 60 years old, with a mean age of 79 years, of which 68% are females and 67.23% have at least one comorbidity. They underwent a hemiarthroplasty for unstable trochanteric fracture during the period between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2010 and were follow-up until the end of 2012, or death. Survival analysis and Cox model were used to characterize mortality. Competing risk analysis and Fine and Gray model were used to estimate the cumulative incidences of the first readmission and the first reoperation.
RESULTS: The follow-up mortality rate for 1-year was 17.94%; 2-year, 29.76%; 5-year, 56.8%; and 10-year, 83.38%. The cumulative incidence of the first readmission was 16.4% for 1-year and 22.44% for 3-year. The cumulative incidence of the first reoperation was 13.87% for 1-year, 18.11% for 2-year, 25.79% for 5-year, and 38.24% for 10-year. Male gender, older age, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and lower insured amount were all risk factors for the overall mortality. Older age and higher CCI were risk factors for the first readmission. Older age was a protective factor for reoperation, which is likely due to the competing death.
CONCLUSIONS: The mortality and revision rates after hemiarthroplasty for unstable trochanteric fracture are acceptable as a salvage procedure for this fragile sub-population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hemiarthroplasty; Mortality; Readmission; Reoperation; Unstable trochanteric fracture

Year:  2021        PMID: 33941152     DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04277-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord        ISSN: 1471-2474            Impact factor:   2.362


  37 in total

1.  Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus hemiarthroplasty: a study for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Peifu Tang; Fangke Hu; Jing Shen; Licheng Zhang; Lihai Zhang
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  Cemented calcar replacement versus cementless hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  Deniz Cankaya; Bülent Ozkurt; Abdullah Yalçın Tabak
Journal:  Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2013-11

3.  Comparison of femur intertrochanteric fracture fixation with hemiarthroplasty and proximal femoral nail systems.

Authors:  Gökay Görmeli; Mehmet Fatih Korkmaz; Cemile Ayşe Görmeli; Cihan Adanaş; Turgay Karataş; Sezai Aykın Şimşek
Journal:  Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2015-12

4.  Cementless calcar-replacement hemiarthroplasty compared with intramedullary fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. A prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Shin-Yoon Kim; Yong-Goo Kim; Jun-Kyung Hwang
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Evaluation of proximal femoral nail-antirotation and cemented, bipolar hemiarthroplasty with calcar replacement in treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fractures in terms of mortality and morbidity ratios.

Authors:  Erdinç Esen; Hakan Dur; M Baybars Ataoğlu; Tacettin Ayanoğlu; Sacit Turanlı
Journal:  Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi       Date:  2017-04

Review 6.  Treatment of Hip Fractures in the Elderly.

Authors:  Robert H Quinn; Pekka A Mooar; Jayson N Murray; Ryan Pezold; Kaitlyn S Sevarino
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 7.  Excess mortality following hip fracture: a systematic epidemiological review.

Authors:  B Abrahamsen; T van Staa; R Ariely; M Olson; C Cooper
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Surgical management of hip fractures: an evidence-based review of the literature. II: intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Kevin Kaplan; Ryan Miyamoto; Brett R Levine; Kenneth A Egol; Joseph D Zuckerman
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  Excess mortality after hip fracture among the elderly in Taiwan: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Chang-Bi Wang; Chien-Fu Jeff Lin; Wen-Miin Liang; Chi-Fung Cheng; Yu-Jun Chang; Hsi-Chin Wu; Trong-Neng Wu; Tsai-Hsueh Leu
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Primary bipolar hemiprosthesis for unstable intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Osman Rodop; Ahmet Kiral; Haluk Kaplan; Ibrahim Akmaz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2002-05-09       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  1 in total

1.  Bipolar hemiarthroplasty in unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. The predictive value of the Charlson Comorbidity Index in 1-year mortality.

Authors:  Germán Garabano; Cesar Angel Pesciallo; Leonel Perez Alamino; Glenda Ernst; Hernan Del Sel
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-12-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.