Literature DB >> 3074560

IUD appendicitis during pregnancy.

D I McLaughlin, W Bevins, B K Karas, L Sonnenberg.   

Abstract

This case shows that abdominal and pelvic x-ray examinations may not adequately show a misplaced IUD in a gravid woman, and further workup is necessary after delivery if the IUD is not clearly visible on the initial x-ray films. It also shows that chronic inflammation may develop in the area of a misplaced IUD, producing chronic abdominal pain and complications, even after several years have transpired. Finally, patients may still be at risk for complications after an IUD has been removed because of the dense adhesions that develop due to the chronic inflammatory response elicited by the IUD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biology; Contraception; Contraception Termination; Contraceptive Methods--complications; Diseases; Examinations And Diagnoses; Family Planning; Gastrointestinal Effects; Iud--complications; Pain; Perforations; Physiology; Pregnancy; Reproduction; Retention; Signs And Symptoms

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3074560      PMCID: PMC1026552     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Med        ISSN: 0093-0415


  7 in total

1.  Appendicitis caused by an intrauterine contraceptive device.

Authors:  I Serra
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Management of the missing intrauterine contraceptive device: report of a case.

Authors:  J C Gorsline; N G Osborne
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-09-15       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  IUD appendicitis.

Authors:  M L Rubinoff
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1975-01-06       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Uterine perforation by a Copper 7 intrauterine contraceptive device with subsequent penetration of the appendix. Case report.

Authors:  N A McWhinney; R Jarrett
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1983-08

5.  IUD appendicitis.

Authors:  J A Goldman; D Peleg; D Feldberg; D Dicker; N Samuel
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.435

Review 6.  Complete and partial uterine perforation and embedding following insertion of intrauterine devices. I. Classification, complications, mechanism, incidence, and missing string.

Authors:  D Zakin; W Z Stern; R Rosenblatt
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.347

7.  Appendiceal perforation by Copper-7 intrauterine contraceptive device.

Authors:  S A Carson; A Gatlin; M Mazur
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1981-11-01       Impact factor: 8.661

  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  Intrauterine contraceptive device appendicitis: a case report.

Authors:  Hao-Ming Chang; Teng-Wei Chen; Chung-Bao Hsieh; Chung-Jueng Chen; Jyh-Cherng Yu; Yao-Chi Liu; Kuo-Liang Shen; De-Chuan Chan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Ectopic Intrauterine Device Revealed by Ureteral Colic in a 37-Week Pregnant Woman: Case Report.

Authors:  Alexandra Matei; Mihai Cornel Traian Dimitriu; Irina Pacu; Crîngu Ionescu
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-08

3.  Transmigration of copper IUCD leading to abdominal abscess: A case report.

Authors:  Ramesh Lamichhane; Swati Kumari; Anuska Khadka
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2022-06-24

4.  Migration of intrauterine device caused asymptomatic acute appendicitis: A case report.

Authors:  Mehrangiz Zamani Bonab; Roghayeh Anvari Aliabad; Shohreh Alimohammadi
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2021-05-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.