Literature DB >> 30744977

Natural Selection and Spatial Cognition in Wild Food-Caching Mountain Chickadees.

Benjamin R Sonnenberg1, Carrie L Branch2, Angela M Pitera1, Eli Bridge3, Vladimir V Pravosudov4.   

Abstract

Understanding how differences in cognition evolve is one of the critical goals in cognitive ecology [1-5]. In food-caching species that rely on memory to recover caches, enhanced spatial cognition has been hypothesized to evolve via natural selection [2, 6-8], but there has been no direct evidence of natural selection acting on spatial memory. Food-caching mountain chickadees living at harsher, higher elevations, with greater reliance on cached food have better spatial learning abilities and larger hippocampi containing more and larger neurons compared to birds from milder, lower elevations [9, 10]. Here, we tested for natural selection on spatial cognition in wild food-caching mountain chickadees at high elevations and documented the following: (1) compared to first-year juveniles, adults showed significantly better performance on two spatial cognitive tasks-spatial learning and memory and a consecutive reversal learning task; (2) cognitive performance in both spatial learning and reversal learning tasks was not significantly different between years in the same chickadees tested in their first year of life and after surviving to their second winter; and (3) cognitive performance in the spatial learning task was significantly better among the first-year juveniles that survived to their second winter compared to the subset of juveniles that did not survive. Taken together, our results provide evidence for natural selection on spatial cognition in a food-caching species living in harsh environments and suggest that natural selection associated with local environmental conditions might be generating intraspecific differences in cognitive abilities. VIDEO ABSTRACT.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RFID; age-class comparison; food caching; harsh environment; mountain chickadee; natural selection; spatial cognition; spatial memory; survival; wild birds

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30744977     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  17 in total

1.  Cognitive flexibility in the wild: Individual differences in reversal learning are explained primarily by proactive interference, not by sampling strategies, in two passerine bird species.

Authors:  Julie Morand-Ferron; Michael S Reichert; John L Quinn
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Social ascent changes cognition, behaviour and physiology in a highly social cichlid fish.

Authors:  Kelly J Wallace; Kavyaa D Choudhary; Layla A Kutty; Don H Le; Matthew T Lee; Karleen Wu; Hans A Hofmann
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Social dominance has limited effects on spatial cognition in a wild food-caching bird.

Authors:  Virginia K Heinen; Lauren M Benedict; Angela M Pitera; Benjamin R Sonnenberg; Eli S Bridge; Vladimir V Pravosudov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Natural variation in developmental condition has limited effect on spatial cognition in a wild food-caching bird.

Authors:  Benjamin R Sonnenberg; Virginia K Heinen; Angela M Pitera; Lauren M Benedict; Carrie L Branch; Eli S Bridge; Jenny Q Ouyang; Vladimir V Pravosudov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 5.530

5.  Memory and the value of social information in foraging bumble bees.

Authors:  Benjamin J Abts; Aimee S Dunlap
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 1.926

6.  Testing the greater male variability phenomenon: male mountain chickadees exhibit larger variation in reversal learning performance compared with females.

Authors:  Carrie L Branch; Benjamin R Sonnenberg; Angela M Pitera; Lauren M Benedict; Dovid Y Kozlovsky; Eli S Bridge; Vladimir V Pravosudov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Specialized spatial cognition is associated with reduced cognitive senescence in a food-caching bird.

Authors:  Virginia K Heinen; Angela M Pitera; Benjamin R Sonnenberg; Lauren M Benedict; Carrie L Branch; Eli S Bridge; Vladimir V Pravosudov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Great tits who remember more accurately have difficulty forgetting, but variation is not driven by environmental harshness.

Authors:  Ethan Hermer; Ben Murphy; Alexis S Chaine; Julie Morand-Ferron
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Food discovery is associated with different reliance on social learning and lower cognitive flexibility across environments in a food-caching bird.

Authors:  Virginia K Heinen; Angela M Pitera; Benjamin R Sonnenberg; Lauren M Benedict; Eli S Bridge; Damien R Farine; Vladimir V Pravosudov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 5.530

Review 10.  Hippocampal volume and navigational ability: The map(ping) is not to scale.

Authors:  Steven M Weisberg; Arne D Ekstrom
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 9.052

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.