| Literature DB >> 30743994 |
Kaitlin S Potts1,2, Afework Mulugeta3, Alessandra N Bazzano4.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Child undernutrition remains a challenge globally and in the geographically diverse country of Ethiopia. Improving dietary diversity and consumption of animal source foods are important for improving child nutrition and corresponding health outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: animal source foods; child nutrition disorders; diet; dietary diversity; food and nutrition; food assistance
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30743994 PMCID: PMC6413062 DOI: 10.3390/nu11020354
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Socio-demographic, economic characteristics, and animal source food consumption of the study participants from the four regions of Ethiopia, 2015 (n = 1009).
| ASF Consumption | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable (Missing) | No | Yes | Total | |
|
| ||||
| Sex of child (6) | 0.6995 b | |||
| Male | 257 (48.7) | 271 (51.3) | 528 (52.6) | |
| Female | 237 (49.9) | 238 (50.1) | 475 (47.4) | |
| Age of child in months (0) | ||||
| Mean (SD) | 18.6 (8.84) | 20.7 (8.45) | 0.0001 c | 19.6 (8.7) |
| Median (Q1, Q3) | 17 (10, 25) | 21 (13, 27) | 20 (12, 26) | |
|
| ||||
| Respondent age in years (39) | ||||
| Mean (SD) | 29.0 (6.3) | 29.6 (6.3) | 0.0979 c | 29.3 (6.3) |
| Median (Q1, Q3) | 28 (25, 32) | 30 (25, 34) | 29 (25, 33) | |
| Total number of children (168) | ||||
| Mean (SD) | 4.0 (1.9) | 3.9 (2.0) | 0.8391 c | 4.0 (1.9) |
| Median (Q1, Q3) | 4 (3, 5) | 4 (2.5, 5) | 0.5721 d | 4 (3, 5) |
| Respondent Education (8) | 0.2367 b | |||
| No education | 322 (47.9) | 351 (52.2) | 673 (67.2) | |
| Any education | 170 (51.8) | 158 (48.2) | 328 (32.8) | |
| Number of household assets (29) | ||||
| Mean (SD) | 1.3 (1.4) | 1.5 (1.6) | 0.0261 c | 1.4 (1.5) |
| Median (Q1, Q3) | 1 (0, 2) | 1 (0, 2) | 0.0395 d | 1 (0, 2) |
| 0 | 186 (51.1) | 178 (48.9) | 0.0336 b | 364 (37.1) |
| 1 | 135 (53.2) | 119 (46.9) | 254 (25.9) | |
| 2–4 | 137 (43.8) | 176 (56.2) | 313 (31.9) | |
| 5–8 | 18 (36.7) | 31 (63.3) | 49 (5.0) | |
| Religion (3) | <0.0001 b | |||
| Muslim | 220 (40.2) | 327 (59.8) | 547 (54.4) | |
| Orthodox | 246 (59.6) | 167 (40.4) | 413 (41.1) | |
| Other e | 28 (60.9) | 18 (39.1) | 46 (4.6) | |
| Livelihood/Occupation (0) | <0.0001 b | |||
| Pastoral | 30 (15.2) | 167 (84.8) | 197 (19.5) | |
| Agro-pastoral | 155 (53.1) | 137 (46.9) | 292 (28.9) | |
| Agricultural/Farmer | 272 (63.9) | 154 (36.2) | 426 (42.2) | |
| Housewife | 16 (45.7) | 19 (54.3) | 35 (3.5) | |
| Other f | 22 (37.3) | 37 (62.7) | 59 (5.8) | |
| Livestock ownership: number of animals owned (23) | ||||
| Mean (SD) | 6.2 (22.4) | 16.2 (27.5) | <0.0001 c | 11.3 (25.7) |
| Median (Q1, Q3) | 1 (1, 6) | 7 (1, 18) | <0.0001 d | 3 (1, 12) |
| 0 | 47 (59.5) | 32 (40.5) | <0.0001 b | 79 (8.0) |
| 1–4 | 279 (60.8) | 180 (39.2) | 459 (46.6) | |
| 5–10 | 70 (48.0) | 76 (52.1) | 146 (14.8) | |
| 10 or more | 83 (27.5) | 219 (72.5) | 302 (30.6) | |
|
| ||||
| Severe food insecurity score (12) | ||||
| Mean (SD) | 0.6 (1.5) | 0.8 (1.6) | 0.0357 c | 0.7 (1.6) |
| Median (Q1, Q3) | 0 (0, 0) | 0 (0, 1) | 0.0055 d | 0 (0, 1) |
| 0 | 385 (51.5) | 362 (48.5) | 0.0008 b | 747 (74.9) |
| 1–3 | 83 (43.7) | 107 (56.3) | 190 (19.1) | |
| 4–6 | 10 (24.4) | 31 (75.6) | 41 (4.1) | |
| 7–9 | 13 (68.4) | 6 (31.6) | 19 (1.9) | |
| No food insecurity | 385 (51.4) | 362 (48.5) | 0.0124 b | |
| Any food insecurity | 106 (42.4) | 144 (57.6) | ||
| Food aid or PSNP participation (0) | <0.0001 b | |||
| No food aid or PSNP participation | 372 (59.4) | 254 (40.6) | 626 (62.0) | |
| Food aid (no PSNP) | 42 (39.3) | 65 (60.8) | 107 (10.6) | |
| PSNP (not direct support) | 68 (34.0) | 132 (66.0) | 200 (19.8) | |
| PSNP direct support | 13 (17.1) | 63 (82.9) | 76 (7.5) | |
|
| ||||
| Minimum dietary diversity (28) | <0.0001 b | |||
| No (<= 3 food groups) | 464 (47.3) | 343 (35.0) | 807 (82.3) | |
| Yes (4–7 food groups) | 19 (1.9) | 155 (15.8) | 174 (17.7) | |
|
|
|
|
| |
a For continuous variables, mean (standard deviation) and median (25th percentile, 75th percentile) are given. b p-value from Pearson’s chi-square test for independence. c p-value from independent samples t-test. d p-value from Wilcoxan rank-sum test. e Protestant, Catholic, No Religion and Other. f Wage worker, daily laborer, trader, other self-employed, retired, physically challenged, and other. ASF, animal source foods; SD, standard deviation; Q1, 25th percentile; Q3, 75th percentile; PSNP, Productive Safety Net Program.
Figure 1Proportion of sample 6–36-month-old children consuming animal source foods and meeting the minimum dietary diversity. ASF, animal source foods; MDD, minimum dietary diversity.
Adjusted odds ratios for consumption of animal source foods by religion, livelihood, and food aid or safety net participation (n = 1006).
| Age-Adjusted OR (95% CI) | Fully Adjusted a OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Age of child—per 3-month increase | 1.09 (1.04, 1.14) | 1.08 (1.03, 1.13) |
| Religion | ||
| Muslim | Referent group | Referent group |
| Orthodox | 0.45 (0.35, 0.59) | 0.70 (0.53, 0.94) |
| Other | 0.44 (0.24, 0.82) | 0.61 (0.31, 1.18) |
| Livelihood/Occupation | ||
| Pastoral | Referent group | Referent group |
| Agro-pastoral | 0.16 (0.10, 0.25) | 0.21 (0.13, 0.35) |
| Agricultural/Farmer | 0.10 (0.07, 0.16) | 0.15 (0.09, 0.23) |
| Housewife and other | 0.26 (0.15, 0.46) | 0.32 (0.18, 0.58) |
| Food aid or PSNP participation | ||
| No food aid or PSNP | Referent group | Referent group |
| Food aid (no PSNP) | 2.26 (1.482, 3.45) | 1.10 (0.68, 1.77) |
| PSNP (not direct support) | 2.82 (2.017, 3.94) | 1.74 (1.21, 2.52) |
| PSNP direct support | 6.89 (3.71, 12.82) | 4.47 (2.33, 8.56) |
a Fully adjusted model included age of child, religion, livelihood/occupation, and food aid or PSNP participation. PSNP, Productive Safety Net Program.