Literature DB >> 30743946

Screening and quantitation of residual antibiotics in two different swine wastewater treatment systems during warm and cold seasons.

Rui Wang1, Feng Feng2, Yufeng Chai3, Xiaoshan Meng3, Qianwen Sui4, Meixue Chen4, Yuansong Wei5, Kemin Qi6.   

Abstract

Due to many occurrences of the illegal addition, misuse and abuse of antibiotics in the swine industry in China, high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) was used to screen and identify these materials in two swine wastewater treatment systems (Swine farm 1: anaerobic digestion - lagoon treatment; Swine farm 2: anaerobic digestion - anoxic treatment - aerobic biological treatment). The results showed that 11 out of 115 antibiotics, including tetracyclines (tetracycline, oxytetracycline, chlortetracycline), sulfonamides (sulfadimidine (SDMD)), macrolides (clarithromycin, tilmicosin (TILM)), fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, enrofloxacin), β‑lactam (penicillin G), and lincosamides (lincomycin), were identified in the swine farms by screening and confirmation methods through HRMS. The quantification method was carried out using triple-quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry, and the recoveries of 11 analytes in the swine wastewater were above 50%. The investigation results showed that the amount of antibiotic residues during the cold season was much higher than that during the warm season. Among the antibiotics, tetracyclines (average of 58%) were the main antibiotic residues in the two swine farms, with TILM second (33%). Sulfonamides (SDMD) existed only in SF1 and accounted for 10% of the total antibiotic concentration. The average proportion of total antibiotics in the solid and liquid phases were 98.5% and 1.5%, respectively, indicating that antibiotics were mainly adsorbed onto solids, though only SDMD remained relatively high in the liquid phase (5.29%). The degradation data of most of the antibiotics detected in the liquid phase during the wastewater treatments well fitted the simple first-order kinetic model in both SF1 and SF2, and the half-lives of the analytes in SF2 were much shorter than those in SF1. After the wastewater treatment process, approximately 80% of the antibiotics could be removed, but sulfonamides remained at a relatively higher percentage and were the main antibiotics in the effluent (approximately 60%).
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Screening antibiotics; Swine wastewater treatment systems; Warm and cold seasons

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30743946     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

1.  Occurrence, Distribution, and Risk Assessment of Antibiotics in the Aquatic Environment of the Karst Plateau Wetland of Yangtze River Basin, Southwestern China.

Authors:  Feng Guo; Yanan Wang; Jie Peng; Hetian Huang; Xiangting Tu; Hu Zhao; Nan Zhan; Zhu Rao; Gaofeng Zhao; Hongbo Yang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-12       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Simple, fast and environmentally friendly method to determine ciprofloxacin in wastewater samples based on an impedimetric immunosensor.

Authors:  Rafaela Silva Lamarca; Ricardo Adriano Dorledo de Faria; Maria Valnice Boldrin Zanoni; Marcelo Nalin; Paulo Clairmont Feitosa de Lima Gomes; Younès Messaddeq
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 4.036

Review 3.  A Review of Methods for Removal of Ceftriaxone from Wastewater.

Authors:  Petro Karungamye; Anita Rugaika; Kelvin Mtei; Revocatus Machunda
Journal:  J Xenobiot       Date:  2022-08-02

Review 4.  A Review of Processes for Removing Antibiotics from Breeding Wastewater.

Authors:  Airu Huang; Muting Yan; Jingjun Lin; Lijie Xu; He Gong; Han Gong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  [Simultaneous determination of 30 antibiotics in soil by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry].

Authors:  Yu Hu; Qingqing Zhu; Ligang Hu; Chunyang Liao
Journal:  Se Pu       Date:  2021-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.