Literature DB >> 30740147

Potential impact of the joint association of total bilirubin and gamma-glutamyltransferase with metabolic syndrome.

Makoto Shiraishi1, Muhei Tanaka1, Hiroshi Okada2, Yoshitaka Hashimoto1, Shinichi Nakagawa3, Muneaki Kumagai3, Teruyuki Yamamoto3, Hiromi Nishimura3, Yohei Oda1, Michiaki Fukui1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome is characterized by the clustering of different metabolic abnormalities. Total bilirubin and gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) levels have been reported to be associated with this condition. However, the extent to which the interaction between these parameters affects metabolic syndrome is unknown. Therefore, we examined the association of total bilirubin and GGT levels with metabolic syndrome, and investigated the combined effect of the two parameters.
METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 8992 middle-aged Japanese subjects (4586 men, 4406 women; mean age, 44.8 ± 9.3 years) without metabolic syndrome from a cohort of employees undergoing annual health examinations. They were divided into four groups according to median total bilirubin and GGT levels: both-low, GGT-high, total bilirubin-high, and both-high. The incident of metabolic syndrome was evaluated during a follow-up of 2.8 ± 1.2 years.
RESULTS: The incident rate of metabolic syndrome during the follow-up was 4.6% in the both-low group, 12.1% in the GGT-high group, 2.7% in the total bilirubin-high group, and 10.6% in the both-high group. Total bilirubin and GGT have an interaction effect on the risk of incident metabolic syndrome (p = 0.0222). The both-low [hazard ratio (HR), 1.37; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.002-1.89], GGT-high (HR, 1.88; 95% CI 1.42-2.52), and both-high (HR, 2.07; 95% CI 1.56-2.80) groups showed an increased adjusted HR for incident metabolic syndrome after adjusting for covariates compared with the total bilirubin-high group.
CONCLUSIONS: The simultaneous presence of high total bilirubin and low GGT levels may be associated with a lower incidence of metabolic syndrome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bilirubin; Gamma-glutamyltransferase; Metabolic syndrome

Year:  2019        PMID: 30740147      PMCID: PMC6360758          DOI: 10.1186/s13098-019-0408-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr        ISSN: 1758-5996            Impact factor:   3.320


Background

Metabolic syndrome is a clustering of metabolic abnormalities including obesity, hyperglycemia, hypertriglyceridemia, hypertension, and decreased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol [1, 2]. Besides the initially identified features of metabolic syndrome, several additional factors have been implicated in the underlying pathogenesis. These include chronic inflammation [3, 4], oxidative stress [5, 6], insulin resistance [6], hepatic steatosis [7], and adipokine level [8, 9]. Metabolic syndrome has been associated with many diseases such as type 2 diabetes [10], cardiovascular diseases [11], and fatty liver disease [12]. Recent studies have shown that total bilirubin [13-19] and gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) [20, 21] are closely associated with metabolic syndrome. Concerning total bilirubin, although previous cross-sectional studies [15, 17] and retrospective longitudinal studies [18, 19] showed an inverse association between total bilirubin and metabolic syndrome, Oda and Aizawa reported in 2013 that total bilirubin was not a risk factor for metabolic syndrome in Japanese men and women [18]. With regard to GGT, several cross-sectional studies [20, 21] found that a high level of GGT was positively associated with metabolic syndrome. Furthermore, Tao et al. concluded that GGT is a sensitive but moderately specific marker for the early diagnosis of metabolic syndrome in adults in Beijing, China [21]. In their cross-sectional study, Wang et al. reported that high total bilirubin levels had a protective effect against metabolic syndrome, whereas high GGT levels were risk factors for metabolic syndrome [22]. However, the extent to which the interaction between total bilirubin and GGT affects metabolic syndrome is unknown. Therefore, in the present study, we examined the relationship between total bilirubin and GGT and metabolic syndrome in middle-aged Japanese subjects. We also investigated the combined effect of total bilirubin and GGT on metabolic syndrome.

Methods

Subjects and study design

The Nishimura Health Survey is an ongoing cohort investigation of risk factors for chronic diseases including hypertension, metabolic syndrome, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease. The Nishimura Clinic (Kyoto, Japan) provides regular health check-up for employees of various companies. In Japan, annual routine health examination of employees is legally mandated, and the employers usually pay all or most of the health-check costs. We performed a retrospective cohort study to assess the relationship between total bilirubin and GGT levels at baseline and incident metabolic syndrome during a follow-up of 2.8 ± 1.2 years. Among 20,852 subjects who underwent health examinations from April 1, 2013, to March 31, 2018, a total of 12,334 subjects underwent two or more health examinations. We excluded 34 subjects with data not examined on at least one variable. From the remaining 12,300 subjects, we excluded 2046 subjects with alcohol intake of > 20 g/day and 1262 subjects with metabolic syndrome at baseline. Finally, 8992 subjects were selected as eligible for the study (Fig. 1). The subjects were divided into four study groups according to the median values of total bilirubin and GGT: (i) both total bilirubin and GGT low (total bilirubin and GGT less than the median value, both-low group), (ii) total bilirubin low and GGT high (total bilirubin less than the median value and GGT equal to or higher than the median value, GGT-high group), (iii) total bilirubin high and GGT low (total bilirubin equal to or higher than the median value and GGT less than the median value, total bilirubin-high group), and (iv) both total bilirubin and GGT high (total bilirubin and GGT equal to or higher than the median value, both-high group).
Fig. 1

Flowchart of the inclusion and exclusion of subjects

Flowchart of the inclusion and exclusion of subjects In addition, all the subjects were divided into another four study groups according to the reference ranges of total bilirubin and GGT: (i) both total bilirubin and GGT levels within the reference range (total bilirubin and GGT levels equal to or lower than the upper reference range, both-reference group), (ii) total bilirubin level within the reference range and GGT level higher than the reference range (total bilirubin level equal to or lower than the upper reference range and GGT level higher than the upper reference range, GGT-higher than reference group), (iii) total bilirubin level above the reference range and GGT level within the reference range (total bilirubin level higher than the upper reference range and GGT level equal to or lower than the upper reference range, total bilirubin-higher than reference group), and (iv) both total bilirubin and GGT levels above the reference range (total bilirubin and GGT levels higher than the upper reference range, both-higher than reference group. All procedures of the present study were approved by the local research ethics committee and were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Data collection and measurements

All subjects provided details of their demographics. Smoking was defined as current tobacco use. Alcohol drinking habits were evaluated by asking the subjects about the amount and frequency of intake of alcoholic beverages per week during the past month, and then estimating the mean ethanol intake per week. When subjects performed any kind of sports at least 30 min/day regularly, they were categorized as regular exercisers. Body mass index was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. After an overnight fast, venous blood was collected for the measurement of the levels of various factors, including fasting plasma glucose, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, total bilirubin, and GGT. We calculated Bil/GGT as the ratio of the total bilirubin value divided by the gamma-glutamyltransferas value. The reference ranges for total bilirubin and GGT were 1.7–20.5 μmol/L and 0.01–0.83 μkat/L, respectively.

Prevalence of fatty liver disease

Abdominal ultrasonography, which was performed by trained technicians, was used for diagnosing fatty liver. Liver brightness and liver contrast were used for diagnosing fatty liver.

Definition of metabolic syndrome

The diagnosis of metabolic syndrome was determined according to the joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; the American Heart Association; the World Heart Federation; the International Atherosclerosis Society; and the International Association for the Study of Obesity, using the criteria for Asians [23]. Metabolic syndrome was diagnosed in the subjects when three or more of the following criteria were present: elevated blood pressure (systolic blood pressure ≥ 130 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 85 mmHg and/or medication for hypertension, in both sexes), hyperglycemia (fasting plasma glucose ≥ 5.6 mmol/L and/or medication for diabetes, in both sexes), hypertriglyceridemia (serum triglycerides ≥ 1.70 mmol/L, in both sexes), low HDL cholesterol levels (serum HDL cholesterol < 1.03 mmol/L and/or medication for dyslipidemia in men and < 1.29 mmol/L and/or medication for dyslipidemia in women), and abdominal obesity (waist circumference ≥ 90 cm in men and ≥ 80 cm in women).

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables are presented as mean ± 1 standard deviation and categorical variables as number (percentage). Differences in categorical and continuous variables across the four study groups were assessed using a Chi-square analysis and one-way analysis of variance, respectively. The hazard ratios (HRs) of the four study groups or Bil/GGT ratio for incident metabolic syndrome were calculated using univariate and multiple Cox regression analyses. The following variables were analyzed as potential covariates: age, body mass index, exercise and smoking status, and number of metabolic syndrome factors. We also tested for a potential interaction effect of the subgroups of total bilirubin and GGT levels on incident metabolic syndrome. To evaluate the predictive performance of the Bil/GGT ratio, we employed the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for censored survival data and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) as criteria. ROC analysis is a standard technique for assessing the performance of a continuous variable for binary classification. As the event occurrence is time-dependent, time-dependent ROC curves are more appropriate than conventional ones in our study. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The level of significance for the interaction term was p < 0.1. Statistical analyses were performed using the JMP version 11.0 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). We also used R software version 3.4.1 and the “survival ROC” package to do the time-dependent ROC curve analysis.

Results

Overall, the mean age of the subjects was 44.8 years (standard deviation, 9.3 years; range, 21–84 years), and 49.0% were women. The median total bilirubin levels in both men and women, men, and women were 13.7 μmol/L (interquartile range, 10.3–17.1 μmol/L), 15.4 μmol/L (12.0–18.8 μmol/L), and 12.0 μmol/L (10.3–15.4 μmol/L), respectively. The median GGT levels in both men and women, men, and women were 0.33 μkat/L (interquartile range, 0.23–0.52 μkat/L), 0.44 μkat/L (0.32–0.68 μkat/L), and 0.26 μkat/L (0.20–0.35 μkat/L), respectively. The characteristics of the subjects in each group (both-low, GGT-high, total bilirubin-high, and both-high) are shown in Table 1. In men, the incident rate of metabolic syndrome during the follow-up was 6.1% (79 of 1303) in the both-low group, 15.0% (199 of 1331) in the GGT-high group, 4.2% (42 of 1007) in the total bilirubin-high group, and 14.8% (140 of 945) in the both-high group. In women, the incident rate of metabolic syndrome during the follow-up was 3.0% (36 of 1186) in the both-low group, 8.5% (87 of 1026) in the GGT-high group, 1.4% (16 of 1125) in the total bilirubin-high group, and 6.8% (73 of 1069) in the both-high group. The prevalence of fatty liver disease in men was 19.3% (252 of 1303) in the both-low group, 42.8% (569 of 1331) in the GGT-high group, 16.2% (163 of 1007) in the total bilirubin-high group, and 42.1% (398 of 945) in the both-high group. In women, the prevalence of fatty liver disease was 5.6% (66 of 1186) in the both-low group, 17.5% (180 of 1026) in the GGT-high group, 4.2% (47 of 1125) in the total bilirubin-high group, and 10.4% (111 of 1069) in the both-high group. In all subjects, the main effect of high total bilirubin (p = 0.0001), the main effect of high GGT (p < 0.0001), and the interaction between total bilirubin and GGT (p = 0.0222) were all significant (Table 2). Cox regression analyses were performed to investigate the association between the four study groups and incident metabolic syndrome (Table 3). In all subjects, the both-low group [HR, 1.74; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.28–2.40], GGT-high group (HR, 4.55; 95% CI 3.46–6.09), and both-high group (HR, 3.97; 95% CI 2.99–5.35) showed an increased unadjusted HR for incident metabolic syndrome compared with the total bilirubin-high group. In all subjects or in women, the both-low, GGT-high, and both-high groups showed an increased adjusted HR for incident metabolic syndrome after adjusting for covariates compared with the total bilirubin-high group. On the other hand, in male subjects, the GGT-high and both-high groups showed an increased adjusted HR for incident metabolic syndrome after adjusting for covariates compared with the total bilirubin-high group; however, the risk in the both-low group did not differ from that of the total bilirubin-high group.
Table 1

Clinical characteristics of the study participants according to total bilirubin and gamma-glutamyltransferase classifications

(A) MenTotal bilirubin (μmol/L)p-value
< 15.4≥ 15.4
Gamma-glutamyltransferase (μkat/L)Gamma-glutamyltransferase (μkat/L)
< 0.44≥ 0.44< 0.44≥ 0.44
n 130313311007945
Age (years)44.3 ± 10.045.7 ± 9.443.0 ± 9.645.3 ± 9.2< 0.0001
Follow-up interval (years)2.8 ± 1.22.8 ± 1.22.8 ± 1.22.8 ± 1.20.5846
Body mass index (kg/m2)22.5 ± 2.523.9 ± 3.022.1 ± 2.423.7 ± 3.0< 0.0001
Current smoking352 (27.0)385 (28.9)150 (14.9)146 (15.5)< 0.0001
Exercise habit315 (24.2)293 (22.0)242 (24.0)218 (23.1)0.5476
Waist circumference (cm)81.0 ± 7.184.8 ± 7.679.7 ± 6.984.3 ± 8.0< 0.0001
Waist circumference ≥ 90 cm139 (10.7)276 (20.7)80 (7.9)188 (19.9)< 0.0001
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)117.9 ± 16.1121.3 ± 14.8117.8 ± 14.0121.2 ± 14.6< 0.0001
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)72.2 ± 11.875.0 ± 11.472.0 ± 10.675.4 ± 11.2< 0.0001
Systolic blood pressure ≥ 130 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 85 mmHg and/or medication for hypertension294 (22.6)395 (29.7)227 (22.5)281 (29.7)< 0.0001
Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L)5.3 ± 0.65.5 ± 0.75.3 ± 0.55.5 ± 0.8< 0.0001
Fasting plasma glucose ≥ 5.6 mmol/L and/or medication for diabetes63 (4.8)106 (8.0)37 (3.7)64 (6.8)< 0.0001
HDL cholesterol (mmol/L)1.6 ± 0.41.6 ± 0.41.7 ± 0.41.6 ± 0.4< 0.0001
HDL cholesterol < 1.03 mmol/L and/or medication for dyslipidemia74 (5.7)102 (7.7)41 (4.1)67 (7.1)0.0021
Triglycerides (mmol/L)a1.1 ± 0.61.4 ± 0.91.0 ± 0.51.3 ± 0.7< 0.0001
Triglycerides ≥ 1.7 mmol/L124 (9.5)341 (25.6)68 (6.8)199 (21.1)< 0.0001
Number of metabolic syndrome factors0.5 ± 0.70.9 ± 0.80.4 ± 0.70.8 ± 0.8< 0.0001
Prevalence of fatty liver disease252 (19.3)569 (42.8)163 (16.2)398 (42.1)< 0.0001
Total bilirubin (μmol/L)12.0 ± 2.612.1 ± 2.622.4 ± 6.722.4 ± 7.1< 0.0001
Gamma-glutamyltransferase (μkat/L)0.3 ± 0.10.9 ± 0.60.3 ± 0.10.9 ± 0.8< 0.0001
Bil/GGT ratio39.5 ± 13.117.1 ± 7.474.6 ± 28.731.8 ± 16.8< 0.0001
Incident metabolic syndrome during follow-up79 (6.1)199 (15.0)42 (4.2)140 (14.8)< 0.0001

Continuous variables are presented as mean ± 1 standard deviation and categorical variables are presented as number (percentage). Differences in categorical and continuous variables across the four study groups were assessed using Chi-square analysis and one-way analysis of variance, respectively

HDL high-density lipoprotein, Bil/GGT ratio total bilirubin to gamma-glutamyltransferase ratio

aValues were analyzed after log transformation

Table 2

Cox regression analysis of significant main effects and interactions of total bilirubin and gamma-glutamyltransferase on incident metabolic syndrome

Predictor variablesMen and womenMenWomen
Hazard ratio (95% CI)p-valueHazard ratio (95% CI)p-valueHazard ratio (95% CI)p-value
Main effects
 Total bilirubin (low total bilirubin)
  High total bilirubin0.70 (0.59–0.85)0.00010.82 (0.66–1.01)0.06770.60 (0.43–0.84)0.0022
 Gamma-glutamyltransferase (low gamma-glutamyltransferase)
  High gamma-glutamyltransferase3.21 (2.69–3.87)< 0.00012.99 (2.42–3.73)< 0.00013.67 (2.66–5.20)< 0.0001
Interaction effects
 Total bilirubin × gamma-glutamyltransferase0.02220.07640.0857

The overall total bilirubin range was divided into two subranges: low total bilirubin (< 15.4 μmol/L in men and < 12.0 μmol/L in women) and high total bilirubin (≥ 15.4 μmol/L in men and ≥ 12.0 μmol/L in women). The overall gamma-glutamyltransferase range was also divided into two subranges: low gamma-glutamyltransferase (< 0.44 μkat/L in men and < 0.26 μkat/L in women) and high gamma-glutamyltransferase (≥ 0.44 μkat/L in men and ≥ 0.26 μkat/L in women). The level of significance for the interaction term was p < 0.1

CI confidence interval

Table 3

Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for incident metabolic syndrome according to classifications of total bilirubin and gamma-glutamyltransferase

UnadjustedModel 1Model 2
(A) Men and women
 Total bilirubin high and GGT low1.001.001.00
 Both total bilirubin and GGT low1.74 (1.28–2.40)1.38 (1.01–1.91)1.37 (1.002–1.89)
 Total bilirubin low and GGT high4.55 (3.46–6.09)2.45 (1.86–3.30)1.88 (1.42–2.52)
 Both total bilirubin and GGT high3.97 (2.99–5.35)2.49 (1.87–3.37)2.07 (1.56–2.80)
(B) Men
 Total bilirubin high and GGT low1.001.001.00
 Both total bilirubin and GGT low1.48 (1.03–2.17)1.22 (0.85–1.80)1.21 (0.83–1.77)
 Total bilirubin low and GGT high3.65 (2.64–5.16)2.17 (1.56–3.08)1.69 (1.22–2.39)
 Both total bilirubin and GGT high3.63 (2.60–5.19)2.25 (1.60–3.23)1.86 (1.32–2.67)
(C) Women
 Total bilirubin high and GGT low1.001.001.00
 Both total bilirubin and GGT low2.21 (1.25–4.09)1.86 (1.05–3.44)1.78 (1.005–3.30)
 Total bilirubin low and GGT high6.09 (3.68–10.76)3.14 (1.88–5.59)2.36 (1.41–4.19)
 Both total bilirubin and GGT high4.89 (2.93–8.71)3.01 (1.79–5.38)2.56 (1.52–4.56)

Model 1: adjusted for age, body mass index, exercise, and smoking status. Model 2: adjusted for model 1 and the number of metabolic syndrome factors. The overall total bilirubin range was divided into two subranges: low total bilirubin (< 15.4 μmol/L in men and < 12.0 μmol/L in women) and high total bilirubin (≥ 15.4 μmol/L in men and ≥ 12.0 μmol/L in women). The overall gamma-glutamyltransferase range was also divided into two subranges: low gamma-glutamyltransferase (< 0.44 μkat/L in men and < 0.26 μkat/L in women) and high gamma-glutamyltransferase (≥ 0.44 μkat/L in men and ≥ 0.26 μkat/L in women)

Clinical characteristics of the study participants according to total bilirubin and gamma-glutamyltransferase classifications Continuous variables are presented as mean ± 1 standard deviation and categorical variables are presented as number (percentage). Differences in categorical and continuous variables across the four study groups were assessed using Chi-square analysis and one-way analysis of variance, respectively HDL high-density lipoprotein, Bil/GGT ratio total bilirubin to gamma-glutamyltransferase ratio aValues were analyzed after log transformation Cox regression analysis of significant main effects and interactions of total bilirubin and gamma-glutamyltransferase on incident metabolic syndrome The overall total bilirubin range was divided into two subranges: low total bilirubin (< 15.4 μmol/L in men and < 12.0 μmol/L in women) and high total bilirubin (≥ 15.4 μmol/L in men and ≥ 12.0 μmol/L in women). The overall gamma-glutamyltransferase range was also divided into two subranges: low gamma-glutamyltransferase (< 0.44 μkat/L in men and < 0.26 μkat/L in women) and high gamma-glutamyltransferase (≥ 0.44 μkat/L in men and ≥ 0.26 μkat/L in women). The level of significance for the interaction term was p < 0.1 CI confidence interval Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for incident metabolic syndrome according to classifications of total bilirubin and gamma-glutamyltransferase Model 1: adjusted for age, body mass index, exercise, and smoking status. Model 2: adjusted for model 1 and the number of metabolic syndrome factors. The overall total bilirubin range was divided into two subranges: low total bilirubin (< 15.4 μmol/L in men and < 12.0 μmol/L in women) and high total bilirubin (≥ 15.4 μmol/L in men and ≥ 12.0 μmol/L in women). The overall gamma-glutamyltransferase range was also divided into two subranges: low gamma-glutamyltransferase (< 0.44 μkat/L in men and < 0.26 μkat/L in women) and high gamma-glutamyltransferase (≥ 0.44 μkat/L in men and ≥ 0.26 μkat/L in women) Three thousand five hundred eleven (76.6%) men and 3895 (88.4%) women had the reference range of bilirubin level, and 3785 (82.5%) men and 4251 (96.5%) women had the reference range of GGT level. There were 2896 men and 3772 women in both-reference group, 615 and 123 in GGT-higher than reference group, 889 and 479 in total bilirubin-higher than reference group, and 186 and 32 in both-higher than reference group. In all subjects, the GGT-higher than reference group (HR, 3.86; 95% CI 2.93–5.14), and both-higher than reference group (HR, 3.58; 95% CI 2.40–5.25) showed an increased unadjusted HR for incident metabolic syndrome compared with the total bilirubin-higher than reference group. In all subjects or in men or women, the Bil/GGT ratio showed a decreased adjusted HR for incident metabolic syndrome after adjusting for covariates (Table 4). To evaluate the performance of the Bil/GGT ratio for predicting metabolic syndrome, time-dependent ROC curve analysis was performed. This analysis provided the AUC for each follow-up time. The AUC and optimized cut-off value for the Bil/GGT ratio to differentiate incident metabolic syndrome at 3 years were 0.708 and 41.0 in all subjects, 0.671 and 28.0 in men, and 0.713 and 41.9 in women. The AUC and optimized cut-off value at 5 years were 0.693 and 41.0 in all subjects, 0.662 and 34.8 in men, and 0.688 and 41.9 in women.
Table 4

Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals of total bilirubin to gamma-glutamyltransferase ratio for incident metabolic syndrome

UnadjustedModel 1Model 2
(A) Men and women
 Total bilirubin to gamma-glutamyltransferase ratio, per 10.0 increment0.73 (0.70–0.76)0.84 (0.80–0.87)0.89 (0.85–0.92)
(B) Men
 Total bilirubin to gamma-glutamyltransferase ratio, per 10.0 increment0.76 (0.72–0.80)0.83 (0.79–0.88)0.89 (0.84–0.94)
(C) Women
 Total bilirubin to gamma-glutamyltransferase ratio, per 10.0 increment0.74 (0.69–0.79)0.85 (0.79–0.90)0.90 (0.84–0.96)

Model 1: adjusted for age, body mass index, exercise, and smoking status. Model 2: adjusted for model 1 and the number of metabolic syndrome factors

Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals of total bilirubin to gamma-glutamyltransferase ratio for incident metabolic syndrome Model 1: adjusted for age, body mass index, exercise, and smoking status. Model 2: adjusted for model 1 and the number of metabolic syndrome factors

Discussion

Our study has four main findings. First, both total bilirubin and GGT were identified as important predictors of metabolic syndrome in middle-aged Japanese subjects without a daily alcohol intake of > 20 g/day. Second, these findings persisted even after adjustment for several factors in all subjects or in women. Third, we observed an interaction effect between total bilirubin and GGT on the risk of incident metabolic syndrome. Finally, we demonstrated that the Bil/GGT ratio was an important predictor of metabolic syndrome. Besides, we were able to provisionally suggest optimal cut-off values for the Bil/GGT ratio to predict metabolic syndrome. Taken together, these findings suggest that total bilirubin and GGT are independently associated with incident metabolic syndrome. In other words, the simultaneous presence of high total bilirubin and low GGT level in a subject was associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome. Recent studies have revealed that total bilirubin is closely related to metabolic syndrome [13-20]. Some of the studies had a cross-sectional design [15, 17] and others were retrospective longitudinal studies [18, 19]. Most of them showed an inverse association between total bilirubin and metabolic syndrome. On the other hand, Oda and Aizawa reported in 2013 that total bilirubin was not a risk factor for metabolic syndrome in Japanese men and women [18]. Oxidative stress has also been associated with metabolic syndrome [5, 6]. The rate-limiting step in heme degradation is catalyzed by heme oxygenase, which results in the release of equimolar quantities of ferrous ion, carbon monoxide, and biliverdin. This biliverdin is converted to bilirubin, the major physiological antioxidant, by biliverdin reductase [24]. Bilirubin is a potent antioxidant that can protect cells from a 10,000-fold excess of hydrogen peroxide [25]. The redox cycle of bilirubin mediated by biliverdin reductase contributes to the potent physiologic antioxidant actions of bilirubin [26]. Our study also found a negative relationship between total bilirubin and metabolic syndrome. Thus, elevated total bilirubin can be a protective factor against metabolic syndrome. With regard to GGT, several reports suggested a highly significant relationship between GGT and metabolic syndrome [20, 21, 27–30]. Xu et al. reported a 4.37-fold increased risk of metabolic syndrome in the highest GGT quartiles after adjusting for age, sex, smoking, alcohol use, and body mass index in a longitudinal study with 5404 subjects [27]. Lee et al. reported a similar finding with an odds ratio of 2.97 in the highest GGT quartile after adjustment for age and drinking status in a cross-sectional study of 3508 subjects [28]. In a cross-sectional study of 7390 adults in Taiwan, Hwang et al. reported an odds ratio of 45.2 in the highest GGT quartile after adjusting for age, body mass index, history of alcoholic fatty liver disease, and medication use [29]. Oh et al. demonstrated an elevated GGT as a sensitive marker of metabolic syndrome in a 4-year cohort study of 3698 Korean male workers [30]. Furthermore, Tao et al. reported that GGT is a sensitive but moderately specific marker for the early diagnosis of metabolic syndrome in adults in Beijing, China [21]. Whitfield [31] and Stark [32] suggested that increases in serum GGT may initiate extracellular glutathione transport into the cells of organ systems, resulting in cellular oxidative stress. Nakanishi et al. supported the idea that a moderate increase of GGT may be a mediator of low-grade systemic inflammation, and explained the strong association of serum GGT with many cardiometabolic risk factors and diseases [33]. In the study by Lee et al. serum GGT level was a predictive factor of the future levels of inflammation and oxidative stress markers, such as fibrinogen, uric acid, C-reactive protein, and F2-isoprostanes [34]. In the present study, GGT was also found to be positively associated with metabolic syndrome. Therefore, GGT may be one of the predictive factors of metabolic syndrome. A previous cross-sectional study demonstrated that GGT activity was weakly positively correlated with bilirubin levels, whereas bilirubin levels decreased progressively with the number of metabolic syndrome components as the mean GGT activity increased [35]. Our present findings are in line with the results of the previous study. In our study, GGT levels were positively associated with bilirubin levels in all subjects (r = 0.076, p < 0.0001) and in women (r = 0.044, p = 0.0035); however, no association was found between GGT and bilirubin levels in men (r = 0.005, p = 0.7216). Nonetheless, the simultaneous presence of high total bilirubin and low GGT level in a subject was associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome. As the convergence of the pro-oxidant potential of the association of higher GGT activity and lower bilirubin levels could contribute significantly to the increased systemic oxidative stress, this apparent contradiction may reflect its implication for the effect of the interaction between GGT and bilirubin levels. Recently, fatty liver disease is considered as a strong determinant for the development of metabolic syndrome [21, 36, 37]. Interestingly, in our study, four study groups according to the median values of total bilirubin and GGT were significantly associated with prevalence of fatty liver disease. Therefore, these results support the concept that both total bilirubin and GGT were identified as important predictors of metabolic syndrome. The present study has four limitations. First, we could not exclude subjects who reported a history of known liver disease, including viral, genetic, autoimmune, and drug-induced liver disease. Since the high levels of bilirubin and GGT may be clinically related to very serious liver diseases, we also tested for the HRs of another four study groups according to the reference ranges of total bilirubin and GGT for incident metabolic syndrome. The GGT-higher than reference group and both-higher than reference group showed an increased unadjusted HR for incident metabolic syndrome compared with the total bilirubin-higher than reference group. The result for study groups according to the reference ranges were almost in line with the result for study groups according to the median values. Second, we analyzed the data of subjects who visited the health promotion center as part of the mandatory annual health check-up for employees of various companies, and this group might not be representative of the general population. Third, because of funds shortage, we did not measure the parameters of oxidative stress, mediators of inflammation, and sex hormones in our study subjects. Fourth, male subjects in the GGT-high group and both-high group showed an increased adjusted HR for incident metabolic syndrome after adjusting for covariates compared with the total bilirubin-high group; however, the risk in the both-low group did not differ from that of the total bilirubin-high group. We cannot explain this sex difference, although the sex difference in the correlation coefficient between GGT and bilirubin levels may have resulted in the discrepancy.

Conclusion

We observed an interaction effect between total bilirubin and GGT on the risk of incident metabolic syndrome. The simultaneous presence of high total bilirubin and low GGT levels may be favorable to the development of incident metabolic syndrome.
  37 in total

1.  Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with the metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  B Isomaa; P Almgren; T Tuomi; B Forsén; K Lahti; M Nissén; M R Taskinen; L Groop
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Bilirubin, formed by activation of heme oxygenase-2, protects neurons against oxidative stress injury.

Authors:  S Doré; M Takahashi; C D Ferris; R Zakhary; L D Hester; D Guastella; S H Snyder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Elevated C-reactive protein: another component of the atherothrombotic profile of abdominal obesity.

Authors:  I Lemieux; A Pascot; D Prud'homme; N Alméras; P Bogaty; A Nadeau; J Bergeron; J P Després
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 8.311

4.  Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase and the metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  A O Rantala; M Lilja; H Kauma; M J Savolainen; A Reunanen; Y A Kesäniemi
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 5.  Gamma glutamyl transferase.

Authors:  J B Whitfield
Journal:  Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.250

6.  Biliverdin reductase: a major physiologic cytoprotectant.

Authors:  David E Baranano; Mahil Rao; Christopher D Ferris; Solomon H Snyder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-11-27       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Chronic subclinical inflammation as part of the insulin resistance syndrome: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study (IRAS).

Authors:  A Festa; R D'Agostino; G Howard; L Mykkänen; R P Tracy; S M Haffner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-07-04       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Gamma-glutamyltransferase is a predictor of incident diabetes and hypertension: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study.

Authors:  Duk-Hee Lee; David R Jacobs; Myron Gross; Catarina I Kiefe; Jeffrey Roseman; Cora E Lewis; Michael Steffes
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  Metabolic syndrome and development of diabetes mellitus: application and validation of recently suggested definitions of the metabolic syndrome in a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  David E Laaksonen; Hanna-Maaria Lakka; Leo K Niskanen; George A Kaplan; Jukka T Salonen; Timo A Lakka
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Serum gamma-glutamyltransferase and risk of metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes in middle-aged Japanese men.

Authors:  Noriyuki Nakanishi; Kenji Suzuki; Kozo Tatara
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  THE EFFECTS OF REALSIL (SILYBIN-PHOSPHOLIPID-VITAMIN E COMPLEX) ON LIVER ENZYMES IN PATIENTS WITH NON-ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE (NAFLD) OR NON-ALCOHOLIC STEATO-HEPATITIS (NASH): A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RCTS.

Authors:  S M Derakhshandeh-Rishehri; M Heidari-Beni; M H Eftekhari
Journal:  Acta Endocrinol (Buchar)       Date:  2020 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 0.877

2.  Serum GGT and serum ferritin as early markers for metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Eli Mohapatra; Ritu Priya; Rachita Nanda; Suprava Patel
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-07-30

3.  Cross-sectional association between gamma-glutamyl transferase and hyperuricaemia: the China Multi-Ethinic Cohort (CMEC) study.

Authors:  Yanjiao Wang; Fang Xu; Xuehui Zhang; Fei Mi; Ying Qian; Rudan Hong; Wei Zou; Hua Bai; Likun He; Songmei Wang; Jianzhong Yin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  Gut microbiome is associated with metabolic syndrome accompanied by elevated gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase in men.

Authors:  Shifeng Sheng; Su Yan; Jingfeng Chen; Yuheng Zhang; Youxiang Wang; Qian Qin; Weikang Li; Tiantian Li; Meng Huang; Suying Ding; Lin Tang
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 6.073

5.  Association of total bilirubin and indirect bilirubin content with metabolic syndrome among Kazakhs in Xinjiang.

Authors:  Hao Hao; Heng Guo; Ru-Lin Ma; Yi-Zhong Yan; Yun-Hua Hu; Jiao-Long Ma; Xiang-Hui Zhang; Xin-Ping Wang; Kui Wang; La-Ti Mu; Yan-Peng Song; Jing-Yu Zhang; Jia He; Shu-Xia Guo
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.763

6.  Non-uniformity of Changes in Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes and Transporters in Liver Cirrhosis: Implications for Drug Dosage Adjustment.

Authors:  Eman El-Khateeb; Brahim Achour; Zubida M Al-Majdoub; Jill Barber; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 4.939

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.