Literature DB >> 30738664

Predicting the effect of reference population on the accuracy of within, across, and multibreed genomic prediction.

I van den Berg1, T H E Meuwissen2, I M MacLeod3, M E Goddard4.   

Abstract

Genomic prediction is widely used to select candidates for breeding. Size and composition of the reference population are important factors influencing prediction accuracy. In Holstein dairy cattle, large reference populations are used, but this is difficult to achieve in numerically small breeds and for traits that are not routinely recorded. The prediction accuracy is usually estimated using cross-validation, requiring the full data set. It would be useful to have a method to predict the benefit of multibreed reference populations that does not require the availability of the full data set. Our objective was to study the effect of the size and breed composition of the reference population on the accuracy of genomic prediction using genomic BLUP and Bayes R. We also examined the effect of trait heritability and validation breed on prediction accuracy. Using these empirical results, we investigated the use of a formula to predict the effect of the size and composition of the reference population on the accuracy of genomic prediction. Phenotypes were simulated in a data set containing real genotypes of imputed sequence variants for 22,752 dairy bulls and cows, including Holstein, Jersey, Red Holstein, and Australian Red cattle. Different reference populations were constructed, varying in size and composition, to study within-breed, multibreed, and across-breed prediction. Phenotypes were simulated varying in heritability, number of chromosomes, and number of quantitative trait loci. Genomic prediction was carried out using genomic BLUP and Bayes R. We used either the genomic relationship matrix (GRM) to estimate the number of independent chromosomal segments and subsequently to predict accuracy, or the accuracies obtained from single-breed reference populations to predict the accuracies of larger or multibreed reference populations. Using the GRM overestimated the accuracy; this overestimation was likely due to close relationships among some of the reference animals. Consequently, the GRM could not be used to predict the accuracy of genomic prediction reliably. However, a method using the prediction accuracies obtained by cross-validation using a small, single-breed reference population predicted the accuracy using a multibreed reference population well and slightly overestimated the accuracy for a larger reference population of the same breed, but gave a reasonably close estimate of the accuracy for a multibreed reference population. This method could be useful for making decisions regarding the size and composition of the reference population.
Copyright © 2019 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  across-breed prediction; genomic prediction; multibreed prediction; prediction accuracy; reference population

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30738664     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2018-15231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  10 in total

1.  Genomic prediction using a reference population of multiple pure breeds and admixed individuals.

Authors:  Emre Karaman; Guosheng Su; Iola Croue; Mogens S Lund
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 4.297

2.  The utility of genomic prediction models in evolutionary genetics.

Authors:  Suzanne E McGaugh; Aaron J Lorenz; Lex E Flagel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 5.530

3.  A deterministic equation to predict the accuracy of multi-population genomic prediction with multiple genomic relationship matrices.

Authors:  Biaty Raymond; Yvonne C J Wientjes; Aniek C Bouwman; Chris Schrooten; Roel F Veerkamp
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 4.297

4.  Theoretical Evaluation of Multi-Breed Genomic Prediction in Chinese Indigenous Cattle.

Authors:  Lei Xu; Zezhao Wang; Bo Zhu; Ying Liu; Hongwei Li; Farhad Bordbar; Yan Chen; Lupei Zhang; Xue Gao; Huijiang Gao; Shengli Zhang; Lingyang Xu; Junya Li
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 5.  An Overview of Key Factors Affecting Genomic Selection for Wheat Quality Traits.

Authors:  Ivana Plavšin; Jerko Gunjača; Zlatko Šatović; Hrvoje Šarčević; Marko Ivić; Krešimir Dvojković; Dario Novoselović
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-11

6.  On the use of whole-genome sequence data for across-breed genomic prediction and fine-scale mapping of QTL.

Authors:  Theo Meuwissen; Irene van den Berg; Mike Goddard
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Predictions of the accuracy of genomic prediction: connecting R2, selection index theory, and Fisher information.

Authors:  Piter Bijma; Jack C M Dekkers
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 4.297

8.  Genetic and genomic characterization followed by single-step genomic evaluation of withers height in German Warmblood horses.

Authors:  Sarah Vosgerau; Nina Krattenmacher; Clemens Falker-Gieske; Anita Seidel; Jens Tetens; Kathrin F Stock; Wietje Nolte; Mirell Wobbe; Iulia Blaj; Reinhard Reents; Christa Kühn; Mario von Depka Prondzinski; Ernst Kalm; Georg Thaller
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Predicting the accuracy of genomic predictions.

Authors:  Jack C M Dekkers; Hailin Su; Jian Cheng
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Optimizing genomic reference populations to improve crossbred performance.

Authors:  Yvonne C J Wientjes; Piter Bijma; Mario P L Calus
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 4.297

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.