Literature DB >> 30738327

Mechanical behavior of metastatic femurs through patient-specific computational models accounting for bone-metastasis interaction.

Cristina Falcinelli1, Alberto Di Martino2, Alessio Gizzi3, Giuseppe Vairo4, Vincenzo Denaro5.   

Abstract

This paper proposes a computational model based on a finite-element formulation for describing the mechanical behavior of femurs affected by metastatic lesions. A novel geometric/constitutive description is introduced by modelling healthy bone and metastases via a linearly poroelastic constitutive approach. A Gaussian-shaped graded transition of material properties between healthy and metastatic tissues is prescribed, in order to account for the bone-metastasis interaction. Loading-induced failure processes are simulated by implementing a progressive damage procedure, formulated via a quasi-static displacement-driven incremental approach, and considering both a stress- and a strain-based failure criterion. By addressing a real clinical case, left and right patient-specific femur models are geometrically reconstructed via an ad-hoc imaging procedure and embedding multiple distributions of metastatic lesions along femurs. Significant differences in fracture loads, fracture mechanisms, and damage patterns, are highlighted by comparing the proposed constitutive description with a purely elastic formulation, where the metastasis is treated as a pseudo-healthy tissue or as a void region. Proposed constitutive description allows to capture stress/strain localization mechanisms within the metastatic tissue, revealing the model capability in describing possible strain-induced mechano-biological stimuli driving onset and evolution of the lesion. The proposed approach opens towards the definition of effective computational strategies for supporting clinical decision and treatments regarding metastatic femurs, contributing also to overcome some limitations of actual standards and procedures.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone constitutive modelling; Femur mechanics; Finite–element analysis; Metastatic femurs; Patient–specific modelling

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30738327     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.01.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  5 in total

Review 1.  Fracture risk assessment and clinical decision making for patients with metastatic bone disease.

Authors:  Timothy A Damron; Kenneth A Mann
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 2.  Patient-Specific Bone Multiscale Modelling, Fracture Simulation and Risk Analysis-A Survey.

Authors:  Amadeus C S de Alcântara; Israel Assis; Daniel Prada; Konrad Mehle; Stefan Schwan; Lucia Costa-Paiva; Munir S Skaf; Luiz C Wrobel; Paulo Sollero
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Osteolytic vs. Osteoblastic Metastatic Lesion: Computational Modeling of the Mechanical Behavior in the Human Vertebra after Screws Fixation Procedure.

Authors:  Daniele Bianchi; Cristina Falcinelli; Leonardo Molinari; Alessio Gizzi; Alberto Di Martino
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Implementing a micromechanical model into a finite element code to simulate the mechanical and microstructural response of arteries.

Authors:  Daniele Bianchi; Claire Morin; Pierre Badel
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2020-06-30

5.  Clinical Outcome and Fracture Risk Prediction of Benign Bone Tumors on the Acetabular Dome: 7-Year Clinical Experience and a Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Hongsheng Yang; Nishant Banskota; Xiang Fang; Yan Xiong; Wenli Zhang; Hong Duan
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 2.629

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.