Simone C Frank1, Jennifer Cohn2, Lorna Dunning3, Emma Sacks4, Rochelle P Walensky5, Sushant Mukherjee4, Caitlin M Dugdale5, Esther Turunga6, Kenneth A Freedberg7, Andrea L Ciaranello8. 1. Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 2. Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, Geneva, Switzerland; Division of Infectious Disease, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 3. Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health & Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. 4. Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, Washington, DC, USA. 5. Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 6. Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, Geneva, Switzerland. 7. Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 8. Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: aciaranello@partners.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: New point-of-care (POC) assays for early infant HIV diagnosis are costlier than conventional total nucleic acid assays, but could increase access to testing, shorten time to results, and expedite initiation of antiretroviral therapy. We aimed to assess the clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness of incorporating these POC assays into early infant diagnosis programmes in Zimbabwe. METHODS: We used the Cost Effectiveness of Preventing AIDS Complications (CEPAC)-Pediatric model to examine the clinical benefits, costs, and cost-effectiveness of replacing conventional assays for early infant HIV diagnosis with POC assays at age 6 weeks in Zimbabwe. We simulated two strategies for early infant HIV diagnosis: conventional and POC. Modelled assays differed in sensitivity; specificity; time to, and probability of, return of results; and cost. Model outcomes included survival, life expectancy, and mean lifetime per-person treatment cost, which were reported separately for all HIV-exposed infants and all infants with HIV. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios with discounted (3% per year) costs and life expectancy from a health-care system perspective for all HIV-exposed infants. We judged incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $1010 (Zimbabwe's annual gross domestic product per person) or less per year of life saved to be cost-effective. FINDINGS: When conventional assays were used for early infant diagnosis, projected undiscounted life expectancy was 22·7 years for infants with HIV and 62·5 years for all HIV-exposed infants, at a cost of $610 per HIV-exposed infant. Use of POC assays for early infant HIV diagnosis improved projected undiscounted life expectancy to 25·5 years among infants with HIV and 62·6 years among HIV-exposed infants at a cost of $690 per HIV-exposed infant. At age 12 weeks, survival among all infants with HIV was 76·1% with the conventional testing strategy and 83·5% with the POC testing strategy. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of POC assays versus conventional assays for early infant diagnosis was $680 per year of life saved. When conventional assay characteristics remained constant, this ratio remained under the cost-effectiveness threshold as long as the specificity and sensitivity of the POC assay were greater than 92% and 65%, respectively. Our results were robust to plausible variations in POC assay cost, the probability of ART initiation, and probability of return of the results of POC testing. INTERPRETATION: Compared with conventional assays, POC assays for early infant HIV diagnosis in Zimbabwe will improve survival, extend life expectancy, and be cost-effective for HIV-exposed infants. FUNDING: Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and Unitaid.
BACKGROUND: New point-of-care (POC) assays for early infant HIV diagnosis are costlier than conventional total nucleic acid assays, but could increase access to testing, shorten time to results, and expedite initiation of antiretroviral therapy. We aimed to assess the clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness of incorporating these POC assays into early infant diagnosis programmes in Zimbabwe. METHODS: We used the Cost Effectiveness of Preventing AIDS Complications (CEPAC)-Pediatric model to examine the clinical benefits, costs, and cost-effectiveness of replacing conventional assays for early infant HIV diagnosis with POC assays at age 6 weeks in Zimbabwe. We simulated two strategies for early infant HIV diagnosis: conventional and POC. Modelled assays differed in sensitivity; specificity; time to, and probability of, return of results; and cost. Model outcomes included survival, life expectancy, and mean lifetime per-person treatment cost, which were reported separately for all HIV-exposed infants and all infants with HIV. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios with discounted (3% per year) costs and life expectancy from a health-care system perspective for all HIV-exposed infants. We judged incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $1010 (Zimbabwe's annual gross domestic product per person) or less per year of life saved to be cost-effective. FINDINGS: When conventional assays were used for early infant diagnosis, projected undiscounted life expectancy was 22·7 years for infants with HIV and 62·5 years for all HIV-exposed infants, at a cost of $610 per HIV-exposed infant. Use of POC assays for early infant HIV diagnosis improved projected undiscounted life expectancy to 25·5 years among infants with HIV and 62·6 years among HIV-exposed infants at a cost of $690 per HIV-exposed infant. At age 12 weeks, survival among all infants with HIV was 76·1% with the conventional testing strategy and 83·5% with the POC testing strategy. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of POC assays versus conventional assays for early infant diagnosis was $680 per year of life saved. When conventional assay characteristics remained constant, this ratio remained under the cost-effectiveness threshold as long as the specificity and sensitivity of the POC assay were greater than 92% and 65%, respectively. Our results were robust to plausible variations in POC assay cost, the probability of ART initiation, and probability of return of the results of POC testing. INTERPRETATION: Compared with conventional assays, POC assays for early infant HIV diagnosis in Zimbabwe will improve survival, extend life expectancy, and be cost-effective for HIV-exposed infants. FUNDING: Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and Unitaid.
Authors: Janne Estill; Matthias Egger; Nello Blaser; Luisa Salazar Vizcaya; Daniela Garone; Robin Wood; Jennifer Campbell; Timothy B Hallett; Olivia Keiser Journal: AIDS Date: 2013-06-01 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Andrea L Ciaranello; Ji-Eun Park; Lynn Ramirez-Avila; Kenneth A Freedberg; Rochelle P Walensky; Valeriane Leroy Journal: BMC Med Date: 2011-05-20 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Andrea L Ciaranello; Bethany L Morris; Rochelle P Walensky; Milton C Weinstein; Samuel Ayaya; Kathleen Doherty; Valeriane Leroy; Taige Hou; Sophie Desmonde; Zhigang Lu; Farzad Noubary; Kunjal Patel; Lynn Ramirez-Avila; Elena Losina; George R Seage; Kenneth A Freedberg Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-12-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Emily P Hyle; Ilesh V Jani; Jonathan Lehe; Amanda E Su; Robin Wood; Jorge Quevedo; Elena Losina; Ingrid V Bassett; Pamela P Pei; A David Paltiel; Stephen Resch; Kenneth A Freedberg; Trevor Peter; Rochelle P Walensky Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2014-09-16 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Sarah J Girdwood; Brooke E Nichols; Crispin Moyo; Thomas Crompton; Dorman Chimhamhiwa; Sydney Rosen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-08-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Giovanni Villa; Adam Abdullahi; Dorcas Owusu; Colette Smith; Marilyn Azumah; Laila Sayeed; Harrison Austin; Dominic Awuah; Apostolos Beloukas; David Chadwick; Richard Phillips; Anna Maria Geretti Journal: EClinicalMedicine Date: 2020-01-05
Authors: Phillip P Salvatore; Gatien de Broucker; Lara Vojnov; William J Moss; David W Dowdy; Catherine G Sutcliffe Journal: AIDS Date: 2021-02-02 Impact factor: 4.632
Authors: Nicole C McCann; Jennifer Cohn; Clare Flanagan; Emma Sacks; Sushant Mukherjee; Rochelle P Walensky; Oluwarantimi Adetunji; Kenneth K Maeka; Christopher Panella; Addmore Chadambuka; Haurovi Mafaune; Collins Odhiambo; Kenneth A Freedberg; Andrea L Ciaranello Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 3.771