| Literature DB >> 30736339 |
Julian Q Quiroz1, Angélica C Torres2, Luisa M Ramirez3, Mariluz S Garcia4, Gelmy C Gomez5, John Rojas6.
Abstract
This study deals with the extraction, optimization, and evaluation of the antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of bioactive compounds obtained from the seeds of annatto using microwave-assisted extraction as compared to leaching. Annatto seeds were subjected to a microwave treatment of 2450 MHz and power of 700 watts using a response surface design involving four factors: pH (4⁻11), solvent concentration (ethanol) (50⁻96 %), solvent-to-seed ratio (2⁻10), and microwave exposure time (0⁻5 min). The contents of polyphenol compounds and bixin were taken as response variables. Subsequently, the antioxidant and antimicrobial activities were assessed at the optimal processing conditions predicted by the experimental design. Microwaves, solvent concentration, and the solvent-to-seed ratio showed a statistically significant effect for the extraction of polyphenol compounds and bixin. Thus, microwaves accelerated the extraction of those compounds and the slight increase in temperature caused some degradation of the polyphenol compounds. The microwave-assisted extraction increased the contents of polyphenols and bixin along with their antioxidant activity as compared to leaching extraction. However, this technique does not significantly improve the antimicrobial activity against Bacillus cereus and Staphylococcus aureus.Entities:
Keywords: antimicrobial activity; antioxidant activity; bixin; polyphenol compounds
Year: 2019 PMID: 30736339 PMCID: PMC6406707 DOI: 10.3390/antiox8020037
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Factor levels of the independent variables according to the Box–Behnken experimental design (BBD).
| Independent Variables | Symbol | Coded Levels | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | 0 | +1 | ||
| Treatment time (min) | X1 | 0 | 2.5 | 5 |
| pH | X2 | 4 | 7.5 | 11 |
| Solvent concentration (ethanol) (%) | X3 | 50 | 73 | 96 |
| Solvent-to-seed ratio (X4:1) | X4 | 2 | 6 | 10 |
Figure 1Schematics for microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) from annatto seeds.
Experimental matrix and results obtained from the MAE.
| Treatment Number | MAE | pH | Solvent Concentration (Ethanol) (%) | Solvent-to-Seed Ratio (X4:1) | MAE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polyphenols | Bixin (%) | |||||
| 1 | 2.5 | 7.5 | 73.0 | 10.0 | 2.83 ± 0.04 | 0.13 ± 0.00 |
| 2 | 2.5 | 4.0 | 50.0 | 6.0 | 1.53 ± 0.22 | 0.03 ± 0.00 |
| 3 | 2.5 | 7.5 | 50.0 | 10.0 | 2.85 ± 0.19 | 0.05 ± 0.00 |
| 4 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 96.0 | 6.0 | 1.96 ± 0.06 | 0.33 ± 0.04 |
| 5 | 2.5 | 7.5 | 73.0 | 6.0 | 1.96 ± 0.15 | 0.05 ± 0.01 |
| 6 | 5.0 | 11.0 | 73.0 | 6.0 | 2.01 ± 0.08 | 0.13 ± 0.02 |
| 7 | 5.0 | 11.0 | 73.0 | 6.0 | 1.35 ± 0.05 | 0.32 ± 0.01 |
| 8 | 2.5 | 11.0 | 96.0 | 6.0 | 3.94 ± 0.00 | 0.51 ± 0.01 |
| 9 | 5.0 | 7.5 | 50.0 | 6.0 | 3.79± 0.07 | 0.04 ± 0.01 |
| 10 | 2.5 | 7.5 | 50.0 | 2.0 | 0.53 ± 0.08 | 0.27 ± 0.03 |
| 11 | 2.5 | 4.0 | 73.0 | 6.0 | 4.16 ± 0.24 | 0.19 ± 0.00 |
| 12 | 2.5 | 4.0 | 73.0 | 2.0 | 0.83 ± 0.06 | 0.12 ± 0.01 |
| 13 | 2.5 | 7.5 | 73.0 | 6.0 | 1.89 ± 0.14 | 0.05 ± 0.01 |
| 14 | 2.5 | 7.5 | 96.0 | 6.0 | 1.72 ± 0.15 | 0.19 ± 0.00 |
| 15 | 2.5 | 11.0 | 73.0 | 10.0 | 3.25 ± 0.57 | 0.04 ± 0.01 |
| 16 | 2.5 | 11.0 | 50.0 | 6.0 | 4.36 ± 0.04 | 0.03 ± 0.00 |
| 17 | 2.5 | 7.5 | 96.0 | 6.0 | 2.43 ± 0.01 | 0.58 ± 0.00 |
| 18 | 2.5 | 7.5 | 96.0 | 2.0 | 0.66 ± 0.01 | 0.38 ± 0.03 |
| 19 | 0.0 | 7.5 | 73.0 | 6.0 | 1.96 ± 0.08 | 0.06 ± 0.01 |
| 20 | 5.0 | 7.5 | 96.0 | 10.0 | 2.10 ± 0.01 | 0.13 ± 0.00 |
| 21 | 2.5 | 7.5 | 73.0 | 2.0 | 0.70 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.02 |
| 22 | 0.0 | 7.5 | 73.0 | 6.0 | 1.90 ± 0.23 | 0.04 ± 0.00 |
| 23 | 2.5 | 11.0 | 73.0 | 2.0 | 0.68 ± 0.03 | 0.17 ± 0.01 |
| 24 | 0.0 | 7.5 | 73.0 | 10.0 | 2.15 ± 0.16 | 0.10 ± 0.01 |
| 25 | 2.5 | 4.0 | 73.0 | 6.0 | 2.28 ± 0.01 | 0.12 ± 0.03 |
| 26 | 0.0 | 7.5 | 73.0 | 6.0 | 2.02 ± 0.03 | 0.08 ± 0.00 |
| 27 | 0.0 | 7.5 | 50.0 | 6.0 | 3.90 ± 0.30 | 0.08 ± 0.00 |
| 28 | 2.5 | 7.5 | 73.0 | 2.0 | 1.57 ± 0.30 | 0.25 ± 0.01 |
| 29 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 73.0 | 10.0 | 1.96 ± 0.15 | 0.33 ± 0.01 |
| 30 | 5.0 | 7.5 | 73.0 | 6.0 | 1.91 ± 0.18 | 0.06 ± 0.02 |
Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). MAE: microwave-assisted extraction, GA: gallic acid.
ANOVA for the response variables in the MAE.
| Variable | Polyphenols | Bixin (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Model | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| X1, treatment time (min) | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| X2, pH | 0.532 | 0.112 |
| X3, solvent concentration (%) | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| X4, solvent-to-seed ratio (X4:1) | <0.0001 | 0.677 |
| X2X3 | 0.001 | ˃0.050 |
| X2X4 | 0.044 | 0.001 |
| X3X4 | ˃0.050 | 0.004 |
| X2X2 | ˃0.050 | <0.0001 |
| X4X4 | <0.0001 | ˃0.050 |
| X1X1 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Lack of fit | 0.0405 | 0.137 |
| r2 | 0.931 | 0.914 |
| r2-adj | 0.901 | 0.875 |
Figure 2Response surface plots of solvent concentration (ethanol) and treatment conditions for: (a) polyphenol compounds and (b) bixin.
Predicted local maximum for the optimization of the MAE applying a Box–Behnken experimental design.
| pH | Solvent (Ethanol) (%) | Solvent-to-Seed Ratio (X4:1) | Treatment Time (min) | Polyphenol | Bixin (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.00 | 96 | 5.95 | 5.00 | 2.69 | 0.58 |
| Experimental result | 3.08 ± 0.01 | 0.58 ± 0.02 | |||
| Relative error | −0.39 | 0.00 | |||
| Absolute error (%) | 14.41 | 0.55 | |||
Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).
Comparison of the antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of annatto extracts obtained by MAE and leaching.
| Extract | MAE | Leaching | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bixin | (%) | 0.576 b ± 0.015 | 0.165 a ± 0.002 |
| Polyphenols | (mg GA/g seed) | 3.078 b ± 0.012 | 0.343 a ± 0.003 |
| ABTS | (µM Trolox/L extract) | 577 b ± 5 | 174 a ± 8 |
| FRAP | (µM Trolox/L extract) | 316 b ± 10 | 127 a ± 2 |
| DPPH | (µM Trolox/L extract) | 1043 b ± 50 | 811 a ± 5 |
|
| pH 11 (mg/L) | 16 a | 128 b |
| pH 7 (mg/L) | 16 a | 128 b | |
| pH 4 (mg/L) | 16 a | 128 b | |
|
| pH 11 (mg/L) | 8 a | 32 b |
| pH 7 (mg/L) | 8 a | 32 b | |
| pH 4 (mg/L) | 8 a | 32 b | |
Different superscript letters within row indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) according to LSD-Fisher; values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). ABTS: 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid), FRAP: Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power, and DPPH: 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl