Literature DB >> 30735238

Assessment of a Personalized Approach to Predicting Postprandial Glycemic Responses to Food Among Individuals Without Diabetes.

Helena Mendes-Soares1,2, Tali Raveh-Sadka3, Shahar Azulay3, Kim Edens1, Yatir Ben-Shlomo3, Yossi Cohen3, Tal Ofek3, Davidi Bachrach3, Josh Stevens3, Dorin Colibaseanu2, Lihi Segal3, Purna Kashyap1,4, Heidi Nelson1,2.   

Abstract

Importance: Emerging evidence suggests that postprandial glycemic responses (PPGRs) to food may be influenced by and predicted according to characteristics unique to each individual, including anthropometric and microbiome variables. Interindividual diversity in PPGRs to food requires a personalized approach for the maintenance of healthy glycemic levels.
Objectives: To describe and predict the glycemic responses of individuals to a diverse array of foods using a model that considers the physiology and microbiome of the individual in addition to the characteristics of the foods consumed. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study using a personalized predictive model enrolled 327 individuals without diabetes from October 11, 2016, to December 13, 2017, in Minnesota and Florida to be part of a study lasting 6 days. The study measured anthropometric variables, described the gut microbial composition, and assessed blood glucose levels every 5 minutes using a continuous glucose monitor. Participants logged their food and activity information for the duration of the study. A predictive model of individualized PPGRs to a diverse array of foods was trained and applied. Main Outcomes and Measures: Glycemic responses to food consumed over 6 days for each participant. The predictive model of personalized PPGRs considered individual features, including the microbiome, in addition to the features of the foods consumed.
Results: Postprandial response to the same foods varied across 327 individuals (mean [SD] age, 45 [12] years; 78.0% female). A model predicting each individual's responses to food that considers several individual factors in addition to food features had better overall performance (R = 0.62) than current standard-of-care approaches using nutritional content alone (R = 0.34 for calories and R = 0.40 for carbohydrates) to control postprandial glycemic levels. Conclusions and Relevance: Across the cohort of adults without diabetes who were examined, a personalized predictive model that considers unique features of the individual, such as clinical characteristics, physiological variables, and the microbiome, in addition to nutrient content was more predictive than current dietary approaches that focus only on the calorie or carbohydrate content of foods. Providing individuals with tools to manage their glycemic responses to food based on personalized predictions of their PPGRs may allow them to maintain their blood glucose levels within limits associated with good health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30735238      PMCID: PMC6484621          DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.8102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Netw Open        ISSN: 2574-3805


  37 in total

Review 1.  Glycemic response and health--a systematic review and meta-analysis: relations between dietary glycemic properties and health outcomes.

Authors:  Geoffrey Livesey; Richard Taylor; Toine Hulshof; John Howlett
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 2.  Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults.

Authors: 
Journal:  WMJ       Date:  1998-10

3.  Mean amplitude of glycemic excursions, a measure of diabetic instability.

Authors:  F J Service; G D Molnar; J W Rosevear; E Ackerman; L C Gatewood; W F Taylor
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 9.461

Review 4.  Postprandial glucose regulation and diabetic complications.

Authors:  Antonio Ceriello; Markolf Hanefeld; Lawrence Leiter; Louis Monnier; Alan Moses; David Owens; Naoko Tajima; Jaakko Tuomilehto
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-10-25

5.  Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance.

Authors:  J Tuomilehto; J Lindström; J G Eriksson; T T Valle; H Hämäläinen; P Ilanne-Parikka; S Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi; M Laakso; A Louheranta; M Rastas; V Salminen; M Uusitupa
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-05-03       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Nutrition labels on pre-packaged foods: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah Campos; Juliana Doxey; David Hammond
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 4.022

7.  The vitamin D receptor gene variant and physical activity predicts fasting glucose levels in healthy young men.

Authors:  J R Ortlepp; J Metrikat; M Albrecht; A von Korff; P Hanrath; R Hoffmann
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.359

8.  Quantitative aspects of glucose production and metabolism in healthy elderly subjects.

Authors:  J J Robert; J C Cummins; R R Wolfe; M Durkot; D E Matthews; X H Zhao; D M Bier; V R Young
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 9.461

9.  An increase in dietary protein improves the blood glucose response in persons with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Mary C Gannon; Frank Q Nuttall; Asad Saeed; Kelly Jordan; Heidi Hoover
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 7.045

10.  Impact of demographics on human gut microbial diversity in a US Midwest population.

Authors:  Jun Chen; Euijung Ryu; Matthew Hathcock; Karla Ballman; Nicholas Chia; Janet E Olson; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.984

View more
  44 in total

Review 1.  The Role of the Gut Microbiome in Predicting Response to Diet and the Development of Precision Nutrition Models-Part I: Overview of Current Methods.

Authors:  Riley L Hughes; Maria L Marco; James P Hughes; Nancy L Keim; Mary E Kable
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 2.  The Role of the Gut Microbiome in Predicting Response to Diet and the Development of Precision Nutrition Models. Part II: Results.

Authors:  Riley L Hughes; Mary E Kable; Maria Marco; Nancy L Keim
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 3.  Therapeutic Opportunities in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Mechanistic Dissection of Host-Microbiome Relationships.

Authors:  Damian R Plichta; Daniel B Graham; Sathish Subramanian; Ramnik J Xavier
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  The Evolution of Personalized Nutrition-From Addis, Pauling, and RJ Williams to the Future.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Bland
Journal:  Integr Med (Encinitas)       Date:  2019-12

Review 5.  The promise of the gut microbiome as part of individualized treatment strategies.

Authors:  Daniel A Schupack; Ruben A T Mars; Dayne H Voelker; Jithma P Abeykoon; Purna C Kashyap
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 6.  Personalized nutrition approach in pediatrics: a narrative review.

Authors:  Gregorio P Milani; Marco Silano; Alessandra Mazzocchi; Silvia Bettocchi; Valentina De Cosmi; Carlo Agostoni
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.756

7.  An Overview of Current Knowledge of the Gut Microbiota and Low-Calorie Sweeteners.

Authors:  Riley L Hughes; Cindy D Davis; Alexandra Lobach; Hannah D Holscher
Journal:  Nutr Today       Date:  2021 May-Jun

Review 8.  Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension.

Authors:  Xiaoxuan Liu; Samantha Cruz Rivera; David Moher; Melanie J Calvert; Alastair K Denniston
Journal:  Lancet Digit Health       Date:  2020-09-09

Review 9.  Diet-microbiota interactions and personalized nutrition.

Authors:  Aleksandra A Kolodziejczyk; Danping Zheng; Eran Elinav
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 60.633

10.  The PERSonalized Glucose Optimization Through Nutritional Intervention (PERSON) Study: Rationale, Design and Preliminary Screening Results.

Authors:  Anouk Gijbels; Inez Trouwborst; Kelly M Jardon; Gabby B Hul; Els Siebelink; Suzanne M Bowser; Dilemin Yildiz; Lisa Wanders; Balázs Erdos; Dick H J Thijssen; Edith J M Feskens; Gijs H Goossens; Lydia A Afman; Ellen E Blaak
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2021-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.