Literature DB >> 20477543

Focal therapy in prostate cancer-report from a consensus panel.

J de la Rosette1, H Ahmed, J Barentsz, T Bjerklund Johansen, M Brausi, M Emberton, F Frauscher, D Greene, M Harisinghani, K Haustermans, A Heidenreich, G Kovacs, M Mason, R Montironi, V Mouraviev, T de Reijke, S Taneja, S Thuroff, B Tombal, J Trachtenberg, H Wijkstra, T Polascik.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To establish a consensus in relation to case selection, conduct of therapy, and outcomes that are associated with focal therapy for men with localized prostate cancer.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Urologic surgeons, radiation oncologists, radiologists, and histopathologists from North America and Europe participated in a consensus workshop on focal therapy for prostate cancer. The consensus process was face to face within a structured meeting, in which pertinent clinical issues were raised, discussed, and agreement sought. Where no agreement was possible, this was acknowledged, and the nature of the disagreement noted.
RESULTS: Candidates for focal treatment should have unilateral low- to intermediate-risk disease with clinical stage <or=cT(2a). Prostate size and both tumor volume and tumor topography are important case selection criteria that depend on the ablative technology used. Currently, the best method to ascertain the key characteristics for men who are considering focal therapy is exposure to transperineal template mapping biopsies. MRI of the prostate using novel techniques such as dynamic contrast enhancement and diffusion weighed imaging are increasingly being used to diagnose and stage primary prostate cancer with excellent results. For general use, however, these new techniques require validation in prospective clinical trials. Until such are performed, MRI will, in most centers, continue to be an investigative tool in assessing eligibility of patients for focal therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Consensus was derived for most of the key aspects of case selection, conduct of treatment, and outcome measures for men who are undergoing focal therapy for localized prostate cancer. The level of agreement achieved will pave the way for future collaborative trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20477543     DOI: 10.1089/end.2009.0596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  45 in total

1.  A review of focal therapy techniques in prostate cancer: clinical results for high-intensity focused ultrasound and focal cryoablation.

Authors:  Colin T Iberti; Nihal Mohamed; Michael A Palese
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2011

2.  Prostate cancer: ideal candidates for focal therapy.

Authors:  Matvey Tsivian; Thomas J Polascik
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Focal therapy of prostate cancer: evidence-based analysis for modern selection criteria.

Authors:  Michael R Abern; Matvey Tsivian; Thomas J Polascik
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  [Focal therapy for prostate cancer].

Authors:  M Schostak
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Role of active surveillance and focal therapy in low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancers.

Authors:  Henk van der Poel; Laurence Klotz; Gerald Andriole; Abdel-Rahmène Azzouzi; Anders Bjartell; Olivier Cussenot; Freddy Hamdy; Markus Graefen; Paolo Palma; Arturo Rodriguez Rivera; Christian G Stief
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Combination of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies is not enough for identifying patients eligible for hemiablative focal therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Young Hyo Choi; Ji Woong Yu; Min Yong Kang; Hyun Hwan Sung; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Il Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Hyun Moo Lee; Hwang Gyun Jeon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in focal therapy for prostate cancer: recommendations from a consensus panel.

Authors:  Berrend G Muller; Jurgen J Fütterer; Rajan T Gupta; Aaron Katz; Alexander Kirkham; John Kurhanewicz; Judd W Moul; Peter A Pinto; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Cary Robertson; Jean de la Rosette; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; J Stephen Jones; Osamu Ukimura; Sadhna Verma; Hessel Wijkstra; Michael Marberger
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  [High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) : Importance in the treatment of prostate cancer].

Authors:  R Ganzer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 9.  Considerations for patient selection for focal therapy.

Authors:  John F Ward; Louis L Pisters
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2013-12

10.  A prospective clinical trial of HIFU hemiablation for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  R van Velthoven; F Aoun; Q Marcelis; S Albisinni; M Zanaty; M Lemort; A Peltier; K Limani
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 5.554

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.