Skye P Barbic1,2,3,4, Adelena Leon1,2, Ian Manion5,6, Sarah Irving7, Rebecca Zivanovic1,3,8, Emily Jenkins1,8,9, Shelly Ben-David1,8, Pouya Azar1,3,10, Amy Salmon1,4,8, Carolyn Helps11, Stephanie Gillingham8, Tara Beaulieu1,12, Rachal Pattison1, Corinne Talon4,8, Oluseyi Oyedele8, Karen Tee8, Steve Mathias1,3,4,8,6,10. 1. 1Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada. 2. 2Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia UBC, Vancouver Campus, TF297-2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 2A1 Canada. 3. 3Department of Psychiatry, UBC, Vancouver, BC Canada. 4. 4Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, BC Canada. 5. 6University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. 6. FRAYME, Ottawa, Canada. 7. 8Canadian Mental Health Association, Vancouver, BC Canada. 8. Foundry Research and Innovation, Vancouver, BC Canada. 9. 9School of Nursing, UBC, Vancouver, BC Canada. 10. 10Department of Psychiatry, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, BC Canada. 11. 11University of Victoria, Victoria, BC Canada. 12. British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While considerable progress is being made to understand the health and self-management needs of youth with mental health disorders, little attention has focused on the mental health and recovery needs that the youth themselves identify-this despite a national priority to incorporate patient-oriented research into the development and assessment of mental health services. To address this gap, estimates of the extent to which existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)-originally developed for use amongst adult populations-are clinically meaningful and psychometrically fit for use among youth are needed. In tandem, a recovery profile for youth can be constructed incorporating the youth perspective of the services provided within a community mental health setting. METHODS/ DESIGN: This study will utilize a mixed methods design incorporating qualitative focus group interviews and cross-sectional survey. Our process will begin with the hiring of a youth peer research partner who will provide lived experience expertise through all phases of the study. We will advertise, recruit, and conduct four focus groups with youth who receive services from the Foundry Vancouver Granville located in British Columbia, Canada. In the first two focus groups, we will recruit youth aged 15-18 years (n = 10). In the second two focus groups, we will recruit young adults aged 19-24 years (n = 10). In parallel, we will conduct a cross-sectional survey of the recovery and mental health needs of youth, informed by ten widely used and validated PROM. Thematic analysis techniques will guide the identification of predominant thematic trends in the qualitative focus group data. We will use Classical and Rasch measurement methods to test and analyze the reliability and validity of selected PROM measures for youth populations. DISCUSSION: The proposed study has the potential to produce a preliminary conceptual and measurement model for understanding the mental health and recovery needs of youth with mental health disorders. This evidence will inform how youth mental health services can grow, support, and sustain the capacity for a collaborative, interdisciplinary and innovative patient-oriented research environment. Findings will also contribute much needed evidence to improve the standard of care for youth who experience mental health disorders in Canada and beyond.
BACKGROUND: While considerable progress is being made to understand the health and self-management needs of youth with mental health disorders, little attention has focused on the mental health and recovery needs that the youth themselves identify-this despite a national priority to incorporate patient-oriented research into the development and assessment of mental health services. To address this gap, estimates of the extent to which existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)-originally developed for use amongst adult populations-are clinically meaningful and psychometrically fit for use among youth are needed. In tandem, a recovery profile for youth can be constructed incorporating the youth perspective of the services provided within a community mental health setting. METHODS/ DESIGN: This study will utilize a mixed methods design incorporating qualitative focus group interviews and cross-sectional survey. Our process will begin with the hiring of a youth peer research partner who will provide lived experience expertise through all phases of the study. We will advertise, recruit, and conduct four focus groups with youth who receive services from the Foundry Vancouver Granville located in British Columbia, Canada. In the first two focus groups, we will recruit youth aged 15-18 years (n = 10). In the second two focus groups, we will recruit young adults aged 19-24 years (n = 10). In parallel, we will conduct a cross-sectional survey of the recovery and mental health needs of youth, informed by ten widely used and validated PROM. Thematic analysis techniques will guide the identification of predominant thematic trends in the qualitative focus group data. We will use Classical and Rasch measurement methods to test and analyze the reliability and validity of selected PROM measures for youth populations. DISCUSSION: The proposed study has the potential to produce a preliminary conceptual and measurement model for understanding the mental health and recovery needs of youth with mental health disorders. This evidence will inform how youth mental health services can grow, support, and sustain the capacity for a collaborative, interdisciplinary and innovative patient-oriented research environment. Findings will also contribute much needed evidence to improve the standard of care for youth who experience mental health disorders in Canada and beyond.
Entities:
Keywords:
Measurement; Mental health; Patient engagement; Young adult
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Patricia Berglund; Olga Demler; Robert Jin; Kathleen R Merikangas; Ellen E Walters Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2005-06
Authors: R C Kessler; G Andrews; L J Colpe; E Hiripi; D K Mroczek; S L T Normand; E E Walters; A M Zaslavsky Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Alexander I F Simpson; Irene Boldt; Stephanie Penney; Roland Jones; Sean Kidd; Arash Nakhost; Treena Wilkie Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2020-05-13 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Cara A Settipani; Lisa D Hawke; Kristin Cleverley; Gloria Chaim; Amy Cheung; Kamna Mehra; Maureen Rice; Peter Szatmari; Joanna Henderson Journal: Int J Ment Health Syst Date: 2019-07-23
Authors: Sara S McMillan; Victoria Stewart; Amanda J Wheeler; Fiona Kelly; Helen Stapleton Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2020-07-30 Impact factor: 3.295