| Literature DB >> 30733638 |
Surapong Khuna1,2, Nakarin Suwannarach1,3, Jaturong Kumla1,3, Wipornpan Nuangmek4, Tanongkiat Kiatsiriroat5.
Abstract
A new species of soil fungi, described herein as Apophysomycesthailandensis, was isolated from soil in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand. Morphologically, this species was distinguished from previously described Apophysomyces species by its narrower trapezoidal sporangiospores. A physiological determination showed that A.thailandensis differs from other Apophysomyces species by its assimilation of D-turanose, D-tagatose, D-fucose, L-fucose, and nitrite. A phylogenetic analysis, performed using combined internal transcribed spacers (ITS), the large subunit (LSU) of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) regions, and a part of the histone 3 (H3) gene, lends support to our the finding that A.thailandensis is distinct from other Apophysomyces species. The genetic distance analysis of the ITS sequence supports A.thailandensis as a new fungal species. A full description, illustrations, phylogenetic tree, and taxonomic key to the new species are provided. Its metal minerals solubilization ability is reported.Entities:
Keywords: Apophysomyces ; mineral solubilization; soil fungi; taxonomy
Year: 2019 PMID: 30733638 PMCID: PMC6363719 DOI: 10.3897/mycokeys.45.30813
Source DB: PubMed Journal: MycoKeys ISSN: 1314-4049 Impact factor: 2.984
Sequences used for phylogenetic analysis. Type species of are in bold.
| Taxa | Strain/isolate | GenBank accession number | References | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| D1/D2 domain |
| |||
|
| CBS 476.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
| CBS 477.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
| FMR 12015 |
| – | – |
|
|
| CBS 658.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
| UTHSC 06-4222 |
|
|
|
|
|
| UTHSC 03-3644 |
|
|
|
|
|
| GMCH 480/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
| IMI 338332 |
|
|
|
|
|
| IMI 338333 |
|
|
|
|
|
| GMCH 211/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
| FMR 13881 |
|
| – | Unpublished |
|
| FMR 13217 |
|
| – | Unpublished |
|
| FMR 12016 |
| – | – |
|
|
| GMCH M333/05 |
| – | – |
|
|
| GMCH M52/05 |
| – | – |
|
|
| UTHSC 08-1425 |
|
|
|
|
|
| UTHSC 08-2146 |
|
|
|
|
|
| UTHSC 06-2356 |
|
|
|
|
|
| UTHSC 04-891 |
|
|
|
|
|
| UTHSC R-3841 |
|
|
|
|
|
| UTHSC 04-838 |
|
|
|
|
|
| UTHSC 07-204 |
|
|
|
|
|
| CBS 136361 |
|
|
|
|
|
| SDBR-CMUS24 |
|
|
| This study |
|
| SDBR-CMUS26 |
|
|
| This study |
|
| SDBR-CMUS219 |
|
|
| This study |
|
| ATCC 60625 |
|
| – |
|
|
| UTHSC 08-3606 |
|
| – |
|
Growth rate of on different media and at different temperatures.
| Medium | Temperature (°C) | Isolate/growth rate (mm/day) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SDBR-CMUS24 | SDBR-CMUS26 (Holotype) | SDBR-CMUS219 | ||
|
| 4 | – | – | – |
| 20 | 5.78 ± 0.51 i | 5.78 ± 0.19 jk | 5.67 ± 0.67 i | |
| 25 | 8.58 ± 0.76 g | 8.67 ± 0.76 g | 8.83 ± 0.88 f | |
| 30 | 28.33 ± 0.00 b | 28.33 ± 0.00 b | 28.33 ± 0.00 b | |
| 37 | 40.64 ± 0.00 a | 45.04 ± 0.00 a | 42.64 ± 0.00 a | |
| 42 | 16.73 ± 0.47 d | 17.00 ± 0.00 d | 16.89 ± 0.19 d | |
| 45 | – | – | – | |
| 50 | – | – | – | |
|
| 4 | – | – | – |
| 20 | 3.64 ± 0.62 k | 3.55 ± 0.16 l | 3.69 ± 0.36 k | |
| 25 | 5.89 ± 019 i | 6.11 ± 0.19 ij | 6.00 ± 0.33 hi | |
| 30 | 7.00 ± 0.71 h | 7.57 ± 0.74 h | 6.95 ± 0.70 gh | |
| 37 | 9.80 ± 1.00 f | 9.93 ± 1.10 f | 9.07 ± 0.99 f | |
| 42 | 6.13 ± 0.63 i | 6.38 ± 0.57 i | 6.08 ± 0.62 hi | |
| 45 | – | – | – | |
| 50 | – | – | – | |
|
| 4 | – | – | – |
| 20 | 4.60 ± 0.20 j | 4.93 ± 0.76 k | 4.67 ± 0.99 j | |
| 25 | 7.89 ± 0.35 g | 8.33 ± 0.76 gh | 7.28 ± 0.19 g | |
| 30 | 17.00 ± 0.00 d | 17.00 ± 0.00 d | 17.00 ± 0.00 d | |
| 37 | 21.25 ± 0.00 c | 21.25 ± 0.00 c | 21.25 ± 0.00 c | |
| 42 | 13.79 ± 0.46 e | 14.09 ± 0.13 e | 13.94 ± 0.39 e | |
| 45 | – | – | – | |
| 50 | – | – | – | |
PDA = potato dextrose agar, MEA = malt extract agar and CZA = Czapek agar. “-” = no growth. Value with the different letters with in the same column indicated the significant difference at P <0.05 according to Tukey’s range test
Carbon assimilation profiles for species obtained with API 50 CH strips.
| Carbon source |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SDBR-CMUS24 | SDBR-CMUS26T | SDBR-CMUS219 | CBS 476.78 T | CBS 136361 T | UTHSC 04-838 T | UTHSC 08-1425 T | CBS 658.93 T | |
| GLY (glycerol) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| ERY (erythritol) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| DARA (D-arabinose) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| LARA (L-arabinose) | + | + | + | + | – | + | + | + |
| RIB (D-ribose) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| DXYL (D-xylose) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| LXYL (L-xylose) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| ADO (D-adonitol) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| MDX ( | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| GAL (D-galactose) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| GLU (D-glucose) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| FRU (D-fructose) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| MNE (D-mannose) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| SBE (L-sorbose) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| RHA (L-rhamnose) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| DUL (dulcitol) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| INO (inositol) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| MAN (D-mannitol) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| SOR (D-sorbitol) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| MDM ( | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| MDG ( | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| NAG ( | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| AMY (amygdalin) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| ARB (arbutin) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| ESC (esculin) | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | – |
| SAL (salicin) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| CEL (D-cellobiose) | – | – | – | + | – | + | + | + |
| MAL (D-maltose) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| LAC (D-lactose) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| MEL (D-melibiose) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| SAC (D-saccharose) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| TRE (D-trehalose) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| INU (inulin) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| MLZ (D-melezitose) | + | + | + | + | – | + | + | + |
| RAF (D-raffinose) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| AMD (amidon) | + | + | + | + | – | + | + | + |
| GLYG (glycogen) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| XLT (xylitol) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| GEN (gentiobiose) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| TUR (D-turanose) | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | – |
| LYX (D-lyxose) | + | + | + | – | + | + | – | – |
| TAG (D-tagatose) | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | – |
| DFUC (D-fucose) | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | – |
| LFUC (L-fucose) | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | – |
| DARL (D-arabitol) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| LARL (L-arabitol) | – | – | – | + | + | + | + | + |
| GNT (potassium gluconate) | – | – | – | – | + | – | – | – |
| 2KG (potassium 2-keto- gluconate) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 5KG (potassium 5-keto- gluconate) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
aThis study, bAlvarez et al. (2010) and cBonifaz et al. (2014)
Nitrogen assimilation and tolerance to chemical compounds for species.
| Nitrogen source and other tests |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SDBR-CMUS24 | SDBR-CMUS26 T | SDBR-CMUS219 | CBS 476.78 T | CBS 136361 T | UTHSC 04-838 T | UTHSC 08-1425 T | CBS 658.93 T | |
| Creatine | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| L-lysine | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Nitrate | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Nitrite | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | – |
| L-tryptophan | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| L-proline | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| L-leucine | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| L-ornithine | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| L-cysteine | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Arginine | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| 2% NaCl | – | – | – | + | + | + | + | + |
| 5% NaCl | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 7% NaCl | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 10% NaCl | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 2% MgCl2 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Cycloheximide 0.1% | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
aThis study, bAlvarez et al. (2010) and cBonifaz et al. (2014)
Figure 1.Phylogenetic tree derived from maximum likelihood analysis of a combined ITS, LSU, and H3 genes of 28 sequences. and were used as outgroup. Numbers above branches are the bootstrap statistics percentages (left) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (right). Branches with bootstrap values ≥ 50% are shown at each branch and the bar represents 0.1 substitutions per nucleotide position. The fungal isolates from this study are in bold. Superscript T = type species.
Mean percentage nucleotide p-distances of ITS (ITS1+5.8S+ITS2) sequences compared between species.
| Number | Within species | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.0 ± 0.00 | ||||||
| 2 | 1.15±0.31 | 4.53±0.43 | |||||
| 3 | 0.10±0.00 | 5.25±0.07 | 4.70±0.28 | ||||
| 4 | 0.55±0.26 | 4.96±0.05 | 5.85±0.24 | 5.95±0.13 | |||
| 5 | – | 15.60±0.00 | 16.30±0.00 | 15.30±0.00 | 16.10±0.00 | ||
| 6 | 0.10±0.00 | 4.56±0.26 | 6.18±0.17 | 5.75±0.21 | 3.00±0.10 | 16.75±0.38 |
Figure 2.Solubilization of non-soluble minerals in agar media by SDBR-CMUS26 (holotype). A Ca3(PO4)2B CuCO3•Cu(OH)2C CuO D ZnCO3E FePO4F MnO G Feldspar H Kaolin. Scale bars: 10 mm. Fungal colonies in E and F were cut for the solubilization area (halo zone) observation.
Figure 3.Solubilization index of the ability to solve non-soluble mineral by . Data are means of three replicates. Error bar at each point indicates ± SD. Different letters above each graph indicate that the means are significantly different by Tukey’s test (P < 0.05)
Figure 4.SDBR-CMUS26 (holotype). A colony on potato dextrose agar B Colony on malt extract agar C Colony on Czapek agar D Branched, aseptate hyphae E Funnel-shaped apophysis F Slightly trapezoidal sporangiospores. Scale bars: 10 mm (A–C), 10 µm (D–E), 20 µm (F).
Origin, isolation source and microscopic observation of species.
| Origin | Isolation source | Microscopic observation | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyphae width (µm) | Sporangiophores (µm) | Sporangia (µm) | Apophyses shape / size (µm) | Sporangiospore shape / size (µm) | |||
|
| India | Soil | 3.4–8 | 400–540 × 3.4–7.5 | 20–60 | Funnel to bell / 10–46 × 11–46 | Ovoid, broadly ellipsoidal to barrel-shaped / 5.4–12 × 3–8 |
|
| Mexico | Human necrotic lesion | 3–5.5 | 100–700 × 3.5–7.0 | 25–30 | Cub-funnel / 12–20 × 8–15 | Slightly trapezoidal / 5–10 × 3–4 |
|
| USA | Cellulitis of human leg wound | 3–5.5 | 100–400 × 2–3.5 | 15–50 | Funnel / 15–20 × 15–20 | Bone-like / 6–8 × 3–5.5 |
|
| USA | Abdominal abscess of human | 3–5.5 | 400 × 2–3.5 | 15–50 | Funnel / 15–20 × 15–20 | Trapezoid / 5–8.5 × 3–5 |
|
| Thailand | Soil | 5–15 | 60–890 × 3.75–7.5 | 25–58 | Funnel to bell / 21–52 × 19–46 | Slightly trapezoidal / 5–9 × 2–3 |
|
| Netherlands | Osteomyelitis of human | 3–5.5 | 100–400 × 2–3.5 | 15–50 | Funnel / 15–20 × 15–20 | Trapezoid, ellipsoid, subtriangular or claviform / 5–14 × 3–6 |
aAlvarez et al. 2010, bMisra et al. (1979), cBonifaz et al. (2014) and dThis study.
| 1 | Sporangiospores trapezoid, ellipsoid, subtriangular or claviform in shape |
|
| – | Sporangiospores less variable in shape |
|
| 2 | Sporangiospores slightly trapezoidal to trapezoidal in shape |
|
| – | Sporangiospores other shapes |
|
| 3 | Sporangiospores 2–3 µm wide |
|
| – | Sporangiospores 3–5 µm wide |
|
| 4 | Apophyses cup-funnel shape, 8–15 µm long |
|
| – | Apophyses funnel-shaped, 15–20 µm long |
|
| 5 | Sporangiospores bone-like in shape |
|
| – | Sporangiospores ovoid, broadly ellipsoidal to barrel-shaped |
|