Literature DB >> 12598693

Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence.

Michael E Alfaro1, Stefan Zoller, François Lutzoni.   

Abstract

Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling has become increasingly popular in phylogenetics as a method for both estimating the maximum likelihood topology and for assessing nodal confidence. Despite the growing use of posterior probabilities, the relationship between the Bayesian measure of confidence and the most commonly used confidence measure in phylogenetics, the nonparametric bootstrap proportion, is poorly understood. We used computer simulation to investigate the behavior of three phylogenetic confidence methods: Bayesian posterior probabilities calculated via Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling (BMCMC-PP), maximum likelihood bootstrap proportion (ML-BP), and maximum parsimony bootstrap proportion (MP-BP). We simulated the evolution of DNA sequence on 17-taxon topologies under 18 evolutionary scenarios and examined the performance of these methods in assigning confidence to correct monophyletic and incorrect monophyletic groups, and we examined the effects of increasing character number on support value. BMCMC-PP and ML-BP were often strongly correlated with one another but could provide substantially different estimates of support on short internodes. In contrast, BMCMC-PP correlated poorly with MP-BP across most of the simulation conditions that we examined. For a given threshold value, more correct monophyletic groups were supported by BMCMC-PP than by either ML-BP or MP-BP. When threshold values were chosen that fixed the rate of accepting incorrect monophyletic relationship as true at 5%, all three methods recovered most of the correct relationships on the simulated topologies, although BMCMC-PP and ML-BP performed better than MP-BP. BMCMC-PP was usually a less biased predictor of phylogenetic accuracy than either bootstrapping method. BMCMC-PP provided high support values for correct topological bipartitions with fewer characters than was needed for nonparametric bootstrap.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12598693     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msg028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  132 in total

1.  Relaxed molecular clocks, the bias-variance trade-off, and the quality of phylogenetic inference.

Authors:  Joel O Wertheim; Michael J Sanderson; Michael Worobey; Adam Bjork
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 15.683

2.  Site-specific evolutionary rate inference: taking phylogenetic uncertainty into account.

Authors:  Itay Mayrose; Amir Mitchell; Tal Pupko
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Fungi evolution revisited: application of the penalized likelihood method to a Bayesian fungal phylogeny provides a new perspective on phylogenetic relationships and divergence dates of Ascomycota groups.

Authors:  Ana Carolina B Padovan; Gerdine F O Sanson; Adriana Brunstein; Marcelo R S Briones
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-05-16       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Testing for differentiation of microbial communities using phylogenetic methods: accounting for uncertainty of phylogenetic inference and character state mapping.

Authors:  Ryan T Jones; Andrew P Martin
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 5.  New methods for inferring population dynamics from microbial sequences.

Authors:  Marcos Pérez-Losada; Megan L Porter; Loubna Tazi; Keith A Crandall
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 3.342

6.  Patterns of group I intron presence in nuclear SSU rDNA of the Lichen family Parmeliaceae.

Authors:  Gabriel Gutiérrez; Oscar Blanco; Pradeep K Divakar; H Thorsten Lumbsch; Ana Crespo
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2007-01-02       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Comparing likelihood and Bayesian coalescent estimation of population parameters.

Authors:  Mary K Kuhner; Lucian P Smith
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Phylogenetic relationships of Steinernema Travassos, 1927 (Nematoda: Cephalobina: Steinernematidae) based on nuclear, mitochondrial and morphological data.

Authors:  Steven A Nadler; Eugene Bolotin; S Patricia Stock
Journal:  Syst Parasitol       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 1.431

9.  Primate phylogenetic relationships and divergence dates inferred from complete mitochondrial genomes.

Authors:  Luca Pozzi; Jason A Hodgson; Andrew S Burrell; Kirstin N Sterner; Ryan L Raaum; Todd R Disotell
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 4.286

10.  Correlated evolution of fig size and color supports the dispersal syndromes hypothesis.

Authors:  Silvia B Lomáscolo; Pablo Speranza; Rebecca T Kimball
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.