| Literature DB >> 30732594 |
Damilola D Adingupu1, Sven O Göpel2, Julia Grönros1, Margareta Behrendt1, Matus Sotak1, Tasso Miliotis3, Ulrika Dahlqvist1, Li-Ming Gan4,5,6, Ann-Cathrine Jönsson-Rylander1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) is the first class of anti-diabetes treatment that reduces mortality and risk for hospitalization due to heart failure. In clinical studies it has been shown that SGLT2i's promote a general shift to fasting state metabolism characterized by reduced body weight and blood glucose, increase in glucagon/insulin ratio and modest increase in blood ketone levels. Therefore, we investigated the connection between metabolic changes and cardiovascular function in the ob/ob-/- mice; a rodent model of early diabetes with specific focus on coronary microvascular function. Due to leptin deficiency these mice develop metabolic syndrome/diabetes and hepatic steatosis. They also develop cardiac contractile and microvascular dysfunction and are thus a promising model for translational studies of cardiometabolic diseases. We investigated whether this mouse model responded in a human-like manner to empagliflozin treatment in terms of metabolic parameters and tested the hypothesis that it could exert direct effects on coronary microvascular function and contractile performance.Entities:
Keywords: Coronary; Endothelial; Microvascular; Prediabetes; SGLT2
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30732594 PMCID: PMC6366096 DOI: 10.1186/s12933-019-0820-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 9.951
Fig. 1Study design, 55 mice arrived at 6 weeks of age and acclimatized for 1 week prior to entry into the study
Fig. 3Analysis of a HbA1c b urine glucose levels, c urine creatine and d urine glucose/creatinine during the study. In the treated group (n = 22) HbA1c decreased, increased in ob/ob−/− untreated group (n = 21), and did not change in lean controls (n = 12) compared with baseline levels. Data were analyzed using repeated measure Anova with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test and are presented as mean with 95% confidence interval. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 represents significant difference between lean controls and ob/ob−/− groups. ‡p ≤ 0.05 for ob/ob−/− treated and untreated group
Fig. 2Food intake (a) and body weight gain (b) in lean and ob/ob−/− with and without treatment at baseline and during empagliflozin treatment. Data were analyzed using Anova with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test and are presented as mean with standard deviation. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 for 5 and 10 weeks compared with baseline, and ‡p ≤ 0.05 for ob/ob−/− treated vs. untreated group
Weight, water intake and urine albumin data in lean controls and leptin-deficient (ob/ob−/−) mice
| Weight | Water intake (ml/mouse/day) | Urine albumin (µg/ml) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body (g) | Heart (g) | Kidney (g) | |||
| Lean (n = 12) | |||||
| BL | 28 ± 1 | n.d | n.d | 6.7 ± 0.6 | 9.5 ± 3.0 (n = 2) |
| 5 weeks | 30 ± 1 | n.d | n.d | 5.0 ± 1.2 | 7.1 ± 2.0 (n = 3) |
| 10 weeks | 33 ± 2 | 0.18 ± 0.04 | 0.21 ± 0.01 | 5.4 ± 0.7 | 7.6 ± 1.4 (n = 6) |
| ob/ob−/− untreated (n = 21) | |||||
| BL | 47 ± 4** | n.d | n.d | 8.2 ± 2.2* | 22.7 ± 5.1 (n = 16) |
| 5 weeks | 53 ± 6** | n.d | n.d | 9.0 ± 4.0* | 15.1 ± 3.1 (n = 19) |
| 10 weeks | 60 ± 6** | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 0.22 ± 0.03 | 8.9 ± 3.8** | 10.95 ± 1.8 (n = 12) |
| ob/ob−/− treated (n = 22) | |||||
| BL | 48 ± 3** | n.d | n.d | 8.1 ± 1.0* | 33.0 ± 4.1 (n = 16) |
| 5 weeks | 54 ± 3** | n.d | n.d | 13.5 ± 1.5*‡ | 7.2 ± 1.1 (n = 9) |
| 10 weeks | 58 ± 3** | 0.20 ± 0.03 | 0.24 ± 0.04*‡ | 14.4 ± 2.8**‡ | 5.2 ± 0.3 (n = 5) |
To monitor the progression of obesity, body weight was studied over time, and as a measure of animal health, water intake was recorded. Wet heart and kidney weight were also recorded at the end of the treatment period. Statistical significance within each time point by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc. Values are presented as mean ± SD for parametric data and mean ± SEM for non-parametric data, where *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 and ‡p ≤ 0.05 for ob/ob−/− treated and untreated group
Echocardiographic data in lean controls and leptin-deficient (ob/ob) treated and untreated mice
| Heart rate (bpm) | Systolic area (mm2) | Diastolic area (mm2) | FAC (%) | LVEDV (mm3) | LVESV (mm3) | SV (µl) | CO (µl/min) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lean (n = 12) | ||||||||
| BL | 348 ± 46 | 5.7 ± 2.4 | 12.1 ± 2.5 | 55 ± 12 | 65.5 ± 17 | 25.8 ± 14.5 | 39.7 ± 6.0 | 13.8 ± 2.1 |
| 5 weeks | 333 ± 58 | 8.7 ± 1.9 | 14.2 ± 1.8 | 41 ± 8 | 78.4 ± 14.4 | 43.6 ± 13.0 | 34.8 ± 7.3 | 11.5 ± 2.7 |
| 10 weeks | 385 ± 45 | 7.5 ± 2.3 | 13.7 ± 2.7 | 46 ± 8 | 76.8 ± 16.4 | 35.8 ± 14.0 | 41.0 ± 6.1 | 15.7 ± 2.9 |
| ob/ob−/− untreated (n = 21) | ||||||||
| BL | 381 ± 44 | 6.7 ± 1.5 | 12.7 ± 1.3 | 48 ± 8 | 71.2 ± 8.5 | 33.1 ± 8.6 | 38.1 ± 5.5 | 14.8 ± 2.8 |
| 5 weeks | 358 ± 37 | 7.7 ± 1.6 | 14.4 ± 1.7 | 47 ± 7 | 82.5 ± 11.8 | 39.1 ± 9.6 | 43.4 ± 8.2* | 15.0 ± 4.7* |
| 10 weeks | 388 ± 43 | 7.9 ± 1.6 | 15.4 ± 1.8 | 49 ± 7 | 88.8 ± 12.5* | 40.1 ± 9.7 | 48.7 ± 6.8* | 19.0 ± 3.1 |
| ob/ob−/− treated (n = 22) | ||||||||
| BL | 402 ± 56* | 6.5 ± 1.3 | 12.6 ± 1.5 | 49 ± 6 | 70.4 ± 10.2 | 31.5 ± 7.6 | 39.0 ± 5.3 | 15.6 ± 2.5 |
| 5 weeks | 389 ± 41* | 6.6 ± 1.7* | 13.1 ± 1.7 | 50 ± 8* | 73.5 ± 11.7 | 32.5 ± 10.2* | 41.0 ± 4.7* | 15.9 ± 2.3* |
| 10 weeks | 421 ± 39*‡ | 6.3 ± 1.4*‡ | 14.6 ± 1.5 | 57 ± 8*‡ | 83.3 ± 10.4 | 30.6 ± 8.3‡ | 52.7 ± 9.6* | 22.3 ± 5.0*‡ |
Cardiac function was studied in lean and leptin-deficient (ob/ob−/−) treated and untreated mice over time by non-invasive transthoracic ultrasound. Heart rate, short axis systolic and diastolic area, and fractional area change (FAC) was recorded. Statistical significance between groups was tested using Anova, and where there were differences Turkey’s multiple comparison test was carried out. Values are presented as mean ± SD, where *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 for significant difference between lean controls and ob/ob−/− groups, ‡p ≤ 0.05 for ob/ob−/− treated and untreated group. BL = baseline, mice at 9 weeks of age, 5 weeks = 5 weeks after intervention start, mice at 16 weeks of age, 10 weeks = 10 weeks after intervention start, mice at 21 weeks of age, LVEDV = left ventricular end-diastolic volume, LVESV = left ventricular end-systolic volume, SV = stroke volume, CO = cardiac output
Fig. 4Coronary flow was studied over time in lean, ob/ob−/− treated and untreated mice using non-invasive transthoracic ultrasound. Coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) a was calculated as the ratio of b coronary hyperemic and c basal flow velocities. Statistical significance between groups was tested using Anova, and where there were differences Turkey’s multiple comparison test was carried out. Values are presented as mean with standard deviation, where *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 for significant difference between lean controls and ob/ob−/− groups. ‡p ≤ 0.05 for ob/ob−/− treated and untreated group
Plasma biomarkers at termination after 4 h fast in lean controls, ob/ob−/− treated and untreated mice
| Lean | ob/ob−/− untreated | ob/ob−/− treated | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cholesterol (mM) | 2.6 ± 0.3 | 5.0 ± 0.9** | 3.8 ± 0.3**‡ |
| Triglycerides (mM) | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.3 | 0.5 ± 0.2 |
| ALAT (µkat/l) | 0.47 ± 0.13 | 8.81 ± 2.85** | 2.63 ± 0.77**‡ |
| Glucagon (pmol/l) | 12.5 ± 9.5 | 16.4 ± 14.1 | 17.2 ± 5.4** |
| Insulin (ng/ml) | 0.3 ± 0.2 | 7.3 ± 2.6** | 6.5 ± 3.2** |
| Glucagon/insulin ratio | 48.7 ± 50.1 | 1.7 ± 0.5** | 3.0 ± 1.5**‡ |
| Beta hydroxybutyrate (µM) | 313 ± 97 | 133 ± 44 | 489 ± 56*‡ |
| NT-proBNP (pg/ml) | – | 8957 ± 1923 | 8216 ± 1462 |
| 69 ± 13 | 26 ± 21** | 41 ± 28**‡ | |
| ADMA (μM) | 0.69 ± 0.07 | 0.79 ± 0.13* | 0.80 ± 0.13* |
| 101 ± 16 | 33 ± 30** | 51 ± 34**‡ | |
| SDMA (μM) | 0.20 ± 0.02 | 0.16 ± 0.03** | 0.16 ± 0.02** |
Functional endothelial data, measures of diabetes, kidney and liver status were studied. Statistical differences between groups was tested using Anova for parametric parameters (SDMA, insulin, and insulin/glucagon ratio) and Kruskal–Wallis test for non-parametric parameters (l-arginine, ADMA, l-arginine/ADMA ratio, glucagon, ALAT, cholesterol, triglycerides and beta hydroxybutyrate). Values are presented as mean ± SD for parametric data and mean ± SEM for non-parametric data, where *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 for between group analysis, and ‡p ≤ 0.05 for ob/ob−/− treated and untreated group
Fig. 5Triglyceride levels and steatotic count. Triglycerides levels in liver tissue in treated (n = 18) compared to untreated (n = 19) ob/ob−/− group (a). Steatosis score in treated (n = 12) compared to untreated (n = 10) ob/ob−/− group (b). Data were analyzed using two-tailed Mann–Whitney test for liver triglycerides and t-test for steatosis score and are presented as mean with standard deviation. ‡p ≤ 0.05 represents significant difference between ob/ob−/− treated and untreated group
Fig. 6Representative images of liver sections stained with hematoxylin–eosin showing patches of vacuolated hepatocytes. Liver section from an untreated ob/ob−/− mouse with highly vacuolated hepatocytes and a high steatosis score (a). Liver section from a treated ob/ob−/− mouse with reduced steatosis score (b). The scale bar equals 200 µm in each figure
Fig. 7Heart vessel area fraction was not significantly different between treated and untreated ob/ob−/− mice (n = 11 per group). Data analyzed using two-tailed Mann–Whitney test, and are presented as mean with standard deviation