Muhammad Abdul-Ghani1, Stefano Del Prato2, Robert Chilton3, Ralph A DeFronzo4. 1. Division of Diabetes, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX Diabetes and Obesity Clinical Research Center, Department of Medicine, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar abdulghani@uthscsa.edu. 2. Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa School of Medicine, Pisa, Italy. 3. Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio and South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX. 4. Division of Diabetes, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX albarado@uthscsa.edu.
Abstract
Although cardiovascular (CV) mortality is the principal cause of death in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), reduction of plasma glucose concentration has little effect on CV disease (CVD) risk. Thus, novel strategies to reduce CVD risk in T2DM patients are needed. The recently published BI 10773 (Empagliflozin) Cardiovascular Outcome Event Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients (EMPA-REG OUTCOME) study demonstrated that in T2DM patients with high CVD riskempagliflozin reduced the primary major adverse cardiac event end point (CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke) by 14%. This beneficial effect was driven by a 38% reduction in CV mortality with no significant decrease in nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke. Empagliflozin also caused a 35% reduction in hospitalization for heart failure without affecting hospitalization for unstable angina. Although sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors exert multiple metabolic benefits (decreases in HbA1c, body weight, and blood pressure and an increase in HDL cholesterol), all of which could reduce CVD risk, it is unlikely that the reduction in CV mortality can be explained by empagliflozin's metabolic effects. More likely, hemodynamic effects, specifically reduced blood pressure and decreased extracellular volume, are responsible for the reduction in CV mortality and heart failure hospitalization. In this Perspective, we will discuss possible mechanisms for these beneficial effects of empagliflozin and their implications for the care of T2DM patients.
RCT Entities:
Although cardiovascular (CV) mortality is the principal cause of death in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), reduction of plasma glucose concentration has little effect on CV disease (CVD) risk. Thus, novel strategies to reduce CVD risk in T2DM patients are needed. The recently published BI 10773 (Empagliflozin) Cardiovascular Outcome Event Trial in Type 2 Diabetes MellitusPatients (EMPA-REG OUTCOME) study demonstrated that in T2DM patients with high CVD risk empagliflozin reduced the primary major adverse cardiac event end point (CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke) by 14%. This beneficial effect was driven by a 38% reduction in CV mortality with no significant decrease in nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke. Empagliflozin also caused a 35% reduction in hospitalization for heart failure without affecting hospitalization for unstable angina. Although sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors exert multiple metabolic benefits (decreases in HbA1c, body weight, and blood pressure and an increase in HDL cholesterol), all of which could reduce CVD risk, it is unlikely that the reduction in CV mortality can be explained by empagliflozin's metabolic effects. More likely, hemodynamic effects, specifically reduced blood pressure and decreased extracellular volume, are responsible for the reduction in CV mortality and heart failure hospitalization. In this Perspective, we will discuss possible mechanisms for these beneficial effects of empagliflozin and their implications for the care of T2DM patients.
Authors: Benjamin M Scirica; Deepak L Bhatt; Eugene Braunwald; P Gabriel Steg; Jaime Davidson; Boaz Hirshberg; Peter Ohman; Robert Frederich; Stephen D Wiviott; Elaine B Hoffman; Matthew A Cavender; Jacob A Udell; Nihar R Desai; Ofri Mosenzon; Darren K McGuire; Kausik K Ray; Lawrence A Leiter; Itamar Raz Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-09-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Stephen Kaptoge; David Wormser; Peter Willeit; Adam S Butterworth; Narinder Bansal; Linda M O'Keeffe; Pei Gao; Angela M Wood; Stephen Burgess; Daniel F Freitag; Lisa Pennells; Sanne A Peters; Carole L Hart; Lise Lund Håheim; Richard F Gillum; Børge G Nordestgaard; Bruce M Psaty; Bu B Yeap; Matthew W Knuiman; Paul J Nietert; Jussi Kauhanen; Jukka T Salonen; Lewis H Kuller; Leon A Simons; Yvonne T van der Schouw; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Randi Selmer; Carlos J Crespo; Beatriz Rodriguez; W M Monique Verschuren; Veikko Salomaa; Kurt Svärdsudd; Pim van der Harst; Cecilia Björkelund; Lars Wilhelmsen; Robert B Wallace; Hermann Brenner; Philippe Amouyel; Elizabeth L M Barr; Hiroyasu Iso; Altan Onat; Maurizio Trevisan; Ralph B D'Agostino; Cyrus Cooper; Maryam Kavousi; Lennart Welin; Ronan Roussel; Frank B Hu; Shinichi Sato; Karina W Davidson; Barbara V Howard; Maarten J G Leening; Maarten Leening; Annika Rosengren; Marcus Dörr; Dorly J H Deeg; Stefan Kiechl; Coen D A Stehouwer; Aulikki Nissinen; Simona Giampaoli; Chiara Donfrancesco; Daan Kromhout; Jackie F Price; Annette Peters; Tom W Meade; Edoardo Casiglia; Debbie A Lawlor; John Gallacher; Dorothea Nagel; Oscar H Franco; Gerd Assmann; Gilles R Dagenais; J Wouter Jukema; Johan Sundström; Mark Woodward; Eric J Brunner; Kay-Tee Khaw; Nicholas J Wareham; Eric A Whitsel; Inger Njølstad; Bo Hedblad; Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller; Gunnar Engström; Wayne D Rosamond; Elizabeth Selvin; Naveed Sattar; Simon G Thompson; John Danesh Journal: JAMA Date: 2015-07-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Erland Erdmann; John A Dormandy; Bernard Charbonnel; Massimo Massi-Benedetti; Ian K Moules; Allan M Skene Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2007-04-16 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Bruce Neal; Vlado Perkovic; Dick de Zeeuw; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Greg Fulcher; Peter Stein; Mehul Desai; Wayne Shaw; Joel Jiang; Frank Vercruysse; Gary Meininger; David Matthews Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2013-06-24 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Matthew J O'Brien; Susan L Karam; Amisha Wallia; Raymond H Kang; Andrew J Cooper; Nicola Lancki; Margaret R Moran; David T Liss; Theodore A Prospect; Ronald T Ackermann Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2018-12-07
Authors: Debapriya Basu; Lesley-Ann Huggins; Diego Scerbo; Joseph Obunike; Adam E Mullick; Paul L Rothenberg; Nicholas A Di Prospero; Robert H Eckel; Ira J Goldberg Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Giuseppe Daniele; Juan Xiong; Carolina Solis-Herrera; Aurora Merovci; Roy Eldor; Devjit Tripathy; Ralph A DeFronzo; Luke Norton; Muhammad Abdul-Ghani Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2016-08-25 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Jonathan D Newman; Anish K Vani; Jose O Aleman; Howard S Weintraub; Jeffrey S Berger; Arthur Z Schwartzbard Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2018-10-09 Impact factor: 24.094