Literature DB >> 30731377

A survey on exposure-response relationships for road, rail, and aircraft noise annoyance: Differences between continuous and intermittent noise.

Mark Brink1, Beat Schäffer2, Danielle Vienneau3, Maria Foraster3, Reto Pieren2, Ikenna C Eze3, Christian Cajochen4, Nicole Probst-Hensch3, Martin Röösli3, Jean-Marc Wunderli2.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to establish exposure-response relationships reflecting the percentage highly annoyed (%HA) as functions of road traffic, railway, and aircraft noise exposure, measured as day-evening-night level (Lden), as well as to elucidate the degree to which the acoustic indicator Intermittency Ratio (IR), which reflects the "eventfulness" of a noise situation, predicts noise annoyance. We conducted a mixed-mode representative population survey in a stratified random sample of 5592 residents exposed to transportation noise all over Switzerland. Source-specific noise exposure was calculated for each floor and each façade based on comprehensive traffic data. Noise annoyance was measured using the ICBEN 11-point scale. The survey was carried out in 4 waves at different times of the year. We hypothesized that in addition to Lden, the effects of noise on annoyance can be better explained when also considering the intensity of short-term variations of noise level over time. We therefore incorporated the acoustic indicator IR in the statistical models. For all noise sources, results revealed significant associations between Lden and %HA after controlling for confounders and independent predictors such as IR (measured over 24 h), exposure to other transportation noise sources, sex and age, language, home ownership, education level, living duration, temperature, and access to a quiet side of the dwelling. Aircraft noise annoyance scored markedly higher than annoyance to railway and road traffic noise at the same Lden level. Railway noise elicited higher percentages of highly annoyed persons than road traffic noise. Results furthermore suggest that for road traffic noise, IR has an additional effect on %HA and can explain shifts of the exposure-response curve of up to about 6 dB between low IR and high IR exposure situations, possibly due to the effect of different durations of noise-free intervals between events. For railway and aircraft noise annoyance, the predictive value of IR was limited.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Annoyance; Exposure-response relationship; Noise metric; Transportation noise

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30731377     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.01.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  25 in total

1.  Exposure to road traffic noise and cognitive development in schoolchildren in Barcelona, Spain: A population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Maria Foraster; Mikel Esnaola; Mónica López-Vicente; Ioar Rivas; Mar Álvarez-Pedrerol; Cecilia Persavento; Nuria Sebastian-Galles; Jesus Pujol; Payam Dadvand; Jordi Sunyer
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 11.613

2.  Association of road traffic noise exposure and prevalence of coronary artery disease: A cross-sectional study in North India.

Authors:  Towseef Ahmed Gilani; Mohammad Shafi Mir
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Short-Term Annoyance Due to Night-Time Road, Railway, and Air Traffic Noise: Role of the Noise Source, the Acoustical Metric, and Non-Acoustical Factors.

Authors:  Sarah Weidenfeld; Sandra Sanok; Rolf Fimmers; Marie-Therese Puth; Daniel Aeschbach; Eva-Maria Elmenhorst
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Comment on Gjestland, T. A Systematic Review of the Basis for WHO's New Recommendation for Limiting Aircraft Noise Annoyance. Int. J. Env. Res. Pub. Health 2018, 15, 2717.

Authors:  Rainer Guski; Dirk Schreckenberg; Rudolf Schuemer; Mark Brink; Stephen A Stansfeld
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Associations of Various Nighttime Noise Exposure Indicators with Objective Sleep Efficiency and Self-Reported Sleep Quality: A Field Study.

Authors:  Martin Röösli; Mark Brink; Franziska Rudzik; Christian Cajochen; Martina S Ragettli; Benjamin Flückiger; Reto Pieren; Danielle Vienneau; Jean-Marc Wunderli
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  Drone Noise Emission Characteristics and Noise Effects on Humans-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Beat Schäffer; Reto Pieren; Kurt Heutschi; Jean Marc Wunderli; Stefan Becker
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  The influence of a signal's time structure on the perceived noise annoyance of road traffic noise.

Authors:  Jan Felcyn
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2021-04-13

8.  The Association between Noise Exposure and Metabolic Syndrome: A Longitudinal Cohort Study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Tao Huang; Ta-Chien Chan; Ying-Jhen Huang; Wen-Chi Pan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-14       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  A Taxonomy Proposal for the Assessment of the Changes in Soundscape Resulting from the COVID-19 Lockdown.

Authors:  César Asensio; Pierre Aumond; Arnaud Can; Luis Gascó; Peter Lercher; Jean-Marc Wunderli; Catherine Lavandier; Guillermo de Arcas; Carlos Ribeiro; Patricio Muñoz; Gaetano Licitra
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Combined Effects of Aircraft, Rail, and Road Traffic Noise on Total Noise Annoyance-A Cross-Sectional Study in Innsbruck.

Authors:  Christoph Lechner; David Schnaiter; Stephan Bose-O'Reilly
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.